Replying to: P. Abbot et al. Nature 471, 10.1038/nature09831 (2011); J. J. Boomsma et al. Nature 471, 10.1038/nature09832 (2011); J. E. Strassmann et al. Nature 471, 10.1038/nature09833 (2011); R. Ferriere & R. E. Michod Nature 471, 10.1038/nature09834 (2011); E. A. Herre & W. T. Wcislo Nature 471, 10.1038/nature09835 (2011)
Our paper challenges the dominant role of inclusive fitness theory in the study of social evolution1. We show that inclusive fitness theory is not a constructive theory that allows a useful mathematical analysis of evolutionary processes. For studying the evolution of cooperation or eusociality we must instead rely on evolutionary game theory or population genetics. The authors of the five comments2,3,4,5,6 offer the usual defence of inclusive fitness theory, but do not take into account our new results.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Wilson, E. O. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)
Abbot, P. et al. Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature 471 10.1038/nature09831 (2011)
Boomsma, J. J. et al. Only full-sibling families evolved eusociality. Nature 471 10.1038/nature09832 (2011)
Strassmann, J. E., Page, R. E., Jr, Robinson, G. E. & Seeley, T. D. Kin selection and eusociality. Nature 471 10.1038/nature09833 (2011)
Ferriere, R. & Michod, R. E. Inclusive fitness in evolution. Nature 471 10.1038/nature09834 (2011)
Herre, E. A. & Wcislo, W. T. In defence of inclusive fitness theory. Nature 471 10.1038/nature09835 (2011)
Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I, II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–52 (1964)
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. Darwinian selection and “altruism”. Theor. Popul. Biol. 14, 268–280 (1978)
Karlin, S. & Matessi, C. Kin selection and altruism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 219, 327–353 (1983)
Queller, D. C. A general model for kin selection. Evolution 46, 376–380 (1992)
Chuang, J. S., Rivoire, O. & Leibler, S. Cooperation and Hamilton’s rule in a simple synthetic microbial system. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 398 (2010)
Traulsen, A. Mathematics of kin- and group-selection: Formally equivalent? Evolution 64, 316–323 (2010)
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Antal, T. Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 19–30 (2010)
Nowak, M. A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006)
Diggle, S. P., Griffin, A. S., Campell, G. S. & West, S. A. Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature 450, 411–414 (2007)
Smith, J., van Dyken, J. D. & Zee, P. C. A generalization of Hamilton’s rule for the evolution of microbial cooperation. Science 328, 1700–1703 (2010)
Michener, C. D. The Social Behavior of the Bees (Harvard Univ. Press, 1974)
Wcislo, W. T. Social interactions and behavioral context in a largely solitary bee, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). Insectes Soc. 44, 199–208 (1997)
Jeanson, R., Kukuk, P. F. & Fewell, J. H. Emergence of division of labour in halictine bees: Contributions of social interactions and behavioural variance. Anim. Behav. 70, 1183–1193 (2005)
Sakagami, S. F. & Maeta, Y. Sociality, induced and/or natural, in the basically solitary small carpenter bees (Ceratina). In Animal Societies: Theories and Facts (eds Itô, Y., Brown, J. L. & Kikkawa, J. ) 1–16 (Japan Scientific Societies Press, 1987)
Competing financial interests: declared none.