Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

In defence of inclusive fitness theory

Abstract

Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)10.1038/nature09205; Nowak et al. reply

Arguably the defining characteristic of the scientific process is its capacity for self-criticism and correction1. Nowak et al.2 challenge proposed connections between relatedness and the evolution of eusociality3, suggest instead that defensible nests and “spring-loaded” traits are key, and present alternative modelling approaches. They then dismiss the utility of Hamilton’s insight that relatedness has a profound evolutionary effect3, formalized in his widely accepted inclusive fitness theory as Hamilton’s rule (“Rise and fall of inclusive fitness theory”). However, we believe that Nowak et al.2 fail to make their case for logical, theoretical and empirical reasons.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Mayr, E. The Growth of Biological Thought (Harvard Univ. Press, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Wilson, E. O. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Hamilton, W. D. Narrow Roads of Gene Land. Vol. I. Evolution of Social Behaviour (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Hughes, W. O. H., Oldroyd, B. P., Beekman, M. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320, 1213–1216 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Cornwallis, C. K., West, S. A., Davis, K. E. & Griffin, A. S. Promiscuity and the evolution to complex societies. Nature 466, 969–972 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Boomsma, J. J. Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 3191–3207 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Costa, J. T. The Other Insect Societies (Harvard Univ. Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Michener, C. D. The Social Behavior of the Bees (Harvard Univ. Press, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Michener, C. D. From solitary to eusocial: Need there be a series of intervening species? Fortschr. Zool. 31, 293–306 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Jeanson, R., Kukuk, P. F. & Fewell, J. H. Emergence of division of labour in halictine bees: Contributions of social interactions and behavioural variance. Anim. Behav. 70, 1183–1193 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Wcislo, W. T. Social interactions and behavioral context in a largely solitary bee, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). Insectes Soc. 44, 199–208 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Cronin, A. L. A molecular phylogeny and social behaviour of Japenese Ceratina (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Xylocopinae). Insect Syst. Evol. 35, 137–146 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Gardner, A., West, S. A. & Barton, N. H. The relation between multilocus population genetics and social evolution theory. Am. Nat. 169, 207–226 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Ratnieks, F. L. W. & Vissher, P. K. Worker policing in honeybees. Nature 342, 796–797 (1989)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Mueller, U. G. Haplodiploidy and the evolution of facultative sex ratios in a primitively eusocial bee. Science 254, 442–444 (1991)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed extensively to all aspects of this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Allen Herre.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Competing financial interests: declared none.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herre, E., Wcislo, W. In defence of inclusive fitness theory. Nature 471, E8–E9 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09835

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing