Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

In defence of inclusive fitness theory

Nature volume 471, pages E8–E9 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)10.1038/nature09205; Nowak et al. reply

Arguably the defining characteristic of the scientific process is its capacity for self-criticism and correction1. Nowak et al.2 challenge proposed connections between relatedness and the evolution of eusociality3, suggest instead that defensible nests and “spring-loaded” traits are key, and present alternative modelling approaches. They then dismiss the utility of Hamilton’s insight that relatedness has a profound evolutionary effect3, formalized in his widely accepted inclusive fitness theory as Hamilton’s rule (“Rise and fall of inclusive fitness theory”). However, we believe that Nowak et al.2 fail to make their case for logical, theoretical and empirical reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mayr, E. The Growth of Biological Thought (Harvard Univ. Press, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Wilson, E. O. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, W. D. Narrow Roads of Gene Land. Vol. I. Evolution of Social Behaviour (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes, W. O. H., Oldroyd, B. P., Beekman, M. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320, 1213–1216 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cornwallis, C. K., West, S. A., Davis, K. E. & Griffin, A. S. Promiscuity and the evolution to complex societies. Nature 466, 969–972 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boomsma, J. J. Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 3191–3207 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Costa, J. T. The Other Insect Societies (Harvard Univ. Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michener, C. D. The Social Behavior of the Bees (Harvard Univ. Press, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michener, C. D. From solitary to eusocial: Need there be a series of intervening species? Fortschr. Zool. 31, 293–306 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jeanson, R., Kukuk, P. F. & Fewell, J. H. Emergence of division of labour in halictine bees: Contributions of social interactions and behavioural variance. Anim. Behav. 70, 1183–1193 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wcislo, W. T. Social interactions and behavioral context in a largely solitary bee, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). Insectes Soc. 44, 199–208 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cronin, A. L. A molecular phylogeny and social behaviour of Japenese Ceratina (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Xylocopinae). Insect Syst. Evol. 35, 137–146 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner, A., West, S. A. & Barton, N. H. The relation between multilocus population genetics and social evolution theory. Am. Nat. 169, 207–226 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ratnieks, F. L. W. & Vissher, P. K. Worker policing in honeybees. Nature 342, 796–797 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mueller, U. G. Haplodiploidy and the evolution of facultative sex ratios in a primitively eusocial bee. Science 254, 442–444 (1991)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama,

    Edward Allen Herre & William T. Wcislo

  2. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, MRC 0580-06, unit 9100 Box 0948, DPO AA, 34002-9998, USA

    Edward Allen Herre & William T. Wcislo

Authors
  1. Edward Allen Herre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William T. Wcislo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed extensively to all aspects of this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Allen Herre.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Competing financial interests: declared none.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herre, E., Wcislo, W. In defence of inclusive fitness theory. Nature 471, E8–E9 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09835

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09835

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing