Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Inclusive fitness in evolution

Nature volume 471, pages E6–E8 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

A Brief Communications Arising to this article was published on 23 March 2011

Abstract

Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)10.1038/nature09205; Nowak et al. reply

For over fifty years, the evolution of social behaviour has been guided by the concept of inclusive fitness as a measure of evolutionary success. Nowak et al.1 argue that inclusive fitness should be abandoned. In so doing, however, they misrepresent the role that inclusive fitness has played in the theory of social evolution by which understanding social behaviour in a variety of disciplines has developed and flourished. By discarding inclusive fitness on the basis of its limitations, they create a conceptual tension which, we argue, is unnecessary, and potentially dangerous for evolutionary biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Fitness landscape and Hamilton’s rule.
Figure 2: Co-evolution of altruism and relatedness.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Wilson, E. O. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Michod, R. E. The theory of kin selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13, 23–55 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Michod, R. E. & Abugov, R. Adaptive topography in family structured models of kin selection. Science 210, 667–669 (1980)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Michod, R. E. Darwinian Dynamics (Princeton Univ. Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Metz, J. A. J. in Encyclopedia of Ecology (eds Jorgensen, S. E. & Fath, B. D. ) (Elsevier, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roff, D. A. Modeling Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. van Baalen, M. & Rand, D. A. The unit of selection in viscous populations and the evolution of altruism. J. Theor. Biol. 193, 631–648 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferriere, R. & Le Galliard, J.-F. in Dispersal (eds Clobert, J., Danchin, E., Dhondt, A. A. & Nichols, J. D. ) 57–79 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cadet, C., Ferriere, R., Metz, J. A. J. & van Baalen, M. The evolution of dispersal under demographic stochasticity. Am. Nat. 162, 427–441 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Galliard, J.-F., Ferriere, R. & Dieckmann, U. The adaptive dynamics of altruism in spatially heterogeneous populations. Evolution 57, 1–17 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lion, S. & van Baalen, M. From infanticide to parental care: why spatial structure can help adults be good parents. Am. Nat. 170, E26–E46 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Metz, J. A. J., Mylius, S. D. & Diekmann, O. When does evolution optimize? Evol. Ecol. Res. 10, 629–654 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michod, R. E. & Sanderson, M. in Evolution—Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith Ch. 7 (eds Greenwood, P. J. & Slatkin, M. ) 95–104 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Day, T. & Taylor, P. D. Unifying genetics and game theoretic models of kin selection for continuous traits. J. Theor. Biol. 194, 391–407 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rousset, F. Separation of time scales, fixation probabilities and convergence to evolutionarily stable states under isolation by distance. Theor. Popul. Biol. 69, 165–179 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Ecologie & Evolution, CNRS UMR 7625, Ecole Normale Superieure, 46 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France

    Regis Ferriere

  2. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85721, Arizona, USA

    Regis Ferriere & Richard E. Michod

Authors
  1. Regis Ferriere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard E. Michod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.F. and R.E.M. conceived the study. R.F. analysed the model and prepared the figures. R.F. and R.E.M. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regis Ferriere.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Competing financial interests: declared none.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferriere, R., Michod, R. Inclusive fitness in evolution. Nature 471, E6–E8 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09834

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09834

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene