Letter | Published:

A candidate redshift z ≈ 10 galaxy and rapid changes in that population at an age of 500 Myr

Nature volume 469, pages 504507 (27 January 2011) | Download Citation

Abstract

Searches for very-high-redshift galaxies over the past decade have yielded a large sample of more than 6,000 galaxies existing just 900–2,000 million years (Myr) after the Big Bang (redshifts 6 > z > 3; ref. 1). The Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF09) data2,3 have yielded the first reliable detections of z ≈ 8 galaxies3,4,5,6,7,8,9 that, together with reports of a γ-ray burst at z ≈ 8.2 (refs 10, 11), constitute the earliest objects reliably reported to date. Observations of z ≈ 7–8 galaxies suggest substantial star formation at z > 9–10 (refs 12, 13). Here we use the full two-year HUDF09 data to conduct an ultra-deep search for z ≈ 10 galaxies in the heart of the reionization epoch, only 500 Myr after the Big Bang. Not only do we find one possible z ≈ 10 galaxy candidate, but we show that, regardless of source detections, the star formation rate density is much smaller (10%) at this time than it is just 200 Myr later at z ≈ 8. This demonstrates how rapid galaxy build-up was at z ≈ 10, as galaxies increased in both luminosity density and volume density from z ≈ 10 to z ≈ 8. The 100–200 Myr before z ≈ 10 is clearly a crucial phase in the assembly of the earliest galaxies.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & UV luminosity functions at z4, 5, and 6 from the Hubble Ultra Deep Field and other deep Hubble Space Telescope ACS fields: evolution and star formation history. Astrophys. J. 670, 928–958 (2007)

  2. 2.

    et al. z7 Galaxies in the HUDF: first epoch WFC3/IR results. Astrophys. J. 709, L16–L20 (2010)

  3. 3.

    et al. Discovery of z8 galaxies in the HUDF from ultra-deep WFC3/IR observations. Astrophys. J. 709, L133–L137 (2010)

  4. 4.

    et al. Galaxies at z6–9 from the WFC3/IR imaging of the HUDF. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 403, 960–983 (2010)

  5. 5.

    et al. The contribution of high redshift galaxies to cosmic reionization: new results from deep WFC3 Imaging of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 409, 855–866 (2010)

  6. 6.

    et al. Galaxy formation in the reionization epoch as hinted by Wide Field Camera 3 observations of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 867–904 (2010)

  7. 7.

    et al. On the stellar populations and evolution of star-forming galaxies at 6.3<z8.6. Astrophys. J. 719, 1250–1273 (2010)

  8. 8.

    , , , & Early star-forming galaxies and the reionization of the Universe. Nature 468, 49–55 (2010)

  9. 9.

    et al. UV luminosity functions from 113 z7 and z8 Lyman-break galaxies in the ultra-deep HUDF09 and wide-area ERS WFC3/IR observations, 2010. Astrophys. J. (submitted); preprint at 〈〉 (2010)

  10. 10.

    et al. A γ-ray burst at a redshift of z ≈ 8. Nature 461, 1254–1257 (2009)

  11. 11.

    et al. GRB090423 at a redshift of z ≈ 8.1. Nature 461, 1258–1260 (2009)

  12. 12.

    et al. Ultradeep IRAC observations of sub-L* z7 and z8 galaxies in the HUDF: the contribution of low-luminosity galaxies to the stellar mass density and reionization. Astrophys. J. 708, L26–L31 (2010)

  13. 13.

    et al. Stellar mass density and specific star formation rates of the Universe at z7. Astrophys. J. 713, 115–130 (2010)

  14. 14.

    et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of a galaxy at z = 8.6. Nature 467, 940–942 (2010)

  15. 15.

    , , , & Spectroscopic confirmation of a population of normal star-forming galaxies at redshifts z > 3. Astrophys. J. 462, L17–L21 (1996)

  16. 16.

    et al. Spectroscopic observations of Lyman break galaxies at redshifts 4, 5, and 6 in the Goods-South Field. Astrophys. J. 695, 1163–1182 (2009)

  17. 17.

    et al. The great observatories origins deep survey. VLT/VIMOS spectroscopy in the GOODS-south field. Astron. Astrophys. 494, 443–460 (2009)

  18. 18.

    et al. Lyman break galaxies at redshift z 3: survey description and full data set. Astrophys. J. 592, 728–754 (2003)

  19. 19.

    et al. A spectroscopic survey of redshift 1.4<z<3.0 galaxies in the GOODS-North Field: survey description, catalogs, and properties. Astrophys. J. 653, 1004–1026 (2006)

  20. 20.

    & Cosmic variance and its effect on the luminosity function determinations in deep high-z surveys. Astrophys. J. 676, 767–780 (2008)

  21. 21.

    , & Cloning Hubble Deep Fields. I. A model-independent measurement of galaxy evolution. Astrophys. J. 506, 557–578 (1998)

  22. 22.

    , , & z 7–10 galaxies in the HUDF and GOODS Fields: UV luminosity functions. Astrophys. J. 686, 230–250 (2008)

  23. 23.

    et al. Evolution of the ionizing background and the epoch of reionization from the spectra of z6 quasars. Astron. J. 123, 1247–1257 (2002)

  24. 24.

    et al. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe observations: cosmological interpretation. Astrophys. J. (in the press); preprint at 〈〉 (2010)

  25. 25.

    et al. UV-continuum slope and dust obscuration from z6 to z2: the star formation rate density at high redshift. Astrophys. J. 705, 936–961 (2009)

  26. 26.

    et al. The Hubble Ultra Deep Field. Astrophys. J. 132, 1729–1755 (2006)

  27. 27.

    & A steep faint-end slope of the UV luminosity function at z 2–3: implications for the global stellar mass density and star formation in low-mass halos. Astrophys. J. 692, 778–803 (2009)

  28. 28.

    et al. Luminosity functions of Lyman break galaxies at z4 and z5 in the Subaru Deep Field. Astrophys. J. 653, 988–1003 (2006)

  29. 29.

    , , , & The luminosity function, halo masses, and stellar masses of luminous Lyman-break galaxies at 5<z6. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 395, 2196–2209 (2009)

  30. 30.

    et al. The GALEX-VVDS measurement of the evolution of the far-ultraviolet luminosity density and the cosmic star formation rate. Astrophys. J. 619, L47–L50 (2005)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all those at NASA, STScI and throughout the community who have worked to make the Hubble Space Telescope the observatory that it is today, and we acknowledge the importance of the servicing missions and those who organised them. We acknowledge our program coordinator W. Januszewski for his care in helping to set up our program and observing configuration. We acknowledge support from NASA and the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Astronomy, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA

    • R. J. Bouwens
    • , G. D. Illingworth
    • , V. González
    •  & D. Magee
  2. Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Leiden NL-2333, The Netherlands

    • R. J. Bouwens
    •  & M. Franx
  3. Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena, California 91101, USA

    • I. Labbe
  4. Institute for Astronomy, ETH Zurich, Zurich CH-8093, Switzerland

    • P. A. Oesch
    •  & C. M. Carollo
  5. University of Colorado, Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA

    • M. Trenti
  6. Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

    • P. G. van Dokkum
  7. Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA

    • M. Stiavelli
    •  & L. Bradley

Authors

  1. Search for R. J. Bouwens in:

  2. Search for G. D. Illingworth in:

  3. Search for I. Labbe in:

  4. Search for P. A. Oesch in:

  5. Search for M. Trenti in:

  6. Search for C. M. Carollo in:

  7. Search for P. G. van Dokkum in:

  8. Search for M. Franx in:

  9. Search for M. Stiavelli in:

  10. Search for V. González in:

  11. Search for D. Magee in:

  12. Search for L. Bradley in:

Contributions

R.J.B. carried out the most of the data analysis and calculations for this paper, and wrote most of the Supplementary Information; G.D.I. wrote most of the text in the Letter and iterated on the initial science results and content with R.J.B.; I.L., P.A.O., M.T., C.M.C., P.G.v.D., M.F., M.S. and L.B. provided significant feedback on the science content and on the drafts; I.L. and V.G. were involved with processing the Spitzer IRAC data; P.A.O. contributed to the data analysis; M.T. made the cosmic variance estimates; and D.M. was involved in data processing and pipeline generation for the WFC3/IR data.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Bouwens.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    The file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures 1-10 with legends, Supplementary Tables 1-2 and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09717

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.