Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Acid sensing by the Drosophila olfactory system

Nature volume 468, pages 691–695 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The odour of acids has a distinct quality that is perceived as sharp, pungent and often irritating1. How acidity is sensed and translated into an appropriate behavioural response is poorly understood. Here we describe a functionally segregated population of olfactory sensory neurons in the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster, that are highly selective for acidity. These olfactory sensory neurons express IR64a, a member of the recently identified ionotropic receptor (IR) family of putative olfactory receptors2. In vivo calcium imaging showed that IR64a+ neurons projecting to the DC4 glomerulus in the antennal lobe are specifically activated by acids. Flies in which the function of IR64a+ neurons or the IR64a gene is disrupted had defects in acid-evoked physiological and behavioural responses, but their responses to non-acidic odorants remained unaffected. Furthermore, artificial stimulation of IR64a+ neurons elicited avoidance responses. Taken together, these results identify cellular and molecular substrates for acid detection in the Drosophila olfactory system and support a labelled-line mode of acidity coding at the periphery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Identification of a glomerulus, DC4, activated by the CO 2 metabolite carbonic acid.
Figure 2: DC4 is innervated by coeloconic sensillar neurons expressing IR64a.
Figure 3: Activation of DC4 by acidity requires IR64a.
Figure 4: IR64a+ neurons and IR64a are necessary and sufficient for avoidance behaviour.
Figure 5: Fruit flies are attracted to components other than acetic acid in vinegar.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dravnieks, A. Odor quality: semantically generated multidimensional profiles are stable. Science 218, 799–801 (1982)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benton, R., Vannice, K. S., Gomez-Diaz, C. & Vosshall, L. B. Variant ionotropic glutamate receptors as chemosensory receptors in Drosophila . Cell 136, 149–162 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ng, M. et al. Transmission of olfactory information between three populations of neurons in the antennal lobe of the fly. Neuron 36, 463–474 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, J. W., Wong, A. M., Flores, J., Vosshall, L. B. & Axel, R. Two-photon calcium imaging reveals an odor-evoked map of activity in the fly brain. Cell 112, 271–282 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellogg, F. E. Water vapour and carbon dioxide receptors in Aedes aegypti . J. Insect Physiol. 16, 99–108 (1970)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thom, C., Guerenstein, P. G., Mechaber, W. L. & Hildebrand, J. G. Floral CO2 reveals flower profitability to moths. J. Chem. Ecol. 30, 1285–1288 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Suh, G. S. et al. A single population of olfactory sensory neurons mediates an innate avoidance behaviour in Drosophila . Nature 431, 854–859 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, W. D., Cayirlioglu, P., Kadow, I. G. & Vosshall, L. B. Two chemosensory receptors together mediate carbon dioxide detection in Drosophila . Nature 445, 86–90 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon, J. Y., Dahanukar, A., Weiss, L. A. & Carlson, J. R. The molecular basis of CO2 reception in Drosophila . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3574–3578 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Faucher, C., Forstreuter, M., Hilker, M. & de Bruyne, M. Behavioral responses of Drosophila to biogenic levels of carbon dioxide depend on life-stage, sex and olfactory context. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 2739–2748 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitamoto, T. Conditional modification of behavior in Drosophila by targeted expression of a temperature-sensitive shibire allele in defined neurons. J. Neurobiol. 47, 81–92 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yorozu, S. et al. Distinct sensory representations of wind and near-field sound in the Drosophila brain. Nature 458, 201–205 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakai, J., Ohkura, M. & Imoto, K. A high signal-to-noise Ca2+ probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein. Nature Biotechnol. 19, 137–141 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Couto, A., Alenius, M. & Dickson, B. J. Molecular, anatomical, and functional organization of the Drosophila olfactory system. Curr. Biol. 15, 1535–1547 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shanbhag, S. R., Singh, K. & Singh, R. N. Fine structure and primary sensory projections of sensilla located in the sacculus of the antenna of Drosophila melanogaster . Cell Tissue Res. 282, 237–249 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Franz, G., Loukeris, T. G., Dialektaki, G., Thompson, C. R. & Savakis, C. Mobile Minos elements from Drosophila hydei encode a two-exon transposase with similarity to the paired DNA-binding domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 4746–4750 (1994)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sweeney, S. T., Broadie, K., Keane, J., Niemann, H. & O’Kane, C. J. Targeted expression of tetanus toxin light chain in Drosophila specifically eliminates synaptic transmission and causes behavioral defects. Neuron 14, 341–351 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sambongi, Y. et al. Caenorhabditis elegans senses protons through amphid chemosensory neurons: proton signals elicit avoidance behavior. Neuroreport 11, 2229–2232 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Joseph, R. M., Devineni, A. V., King, I. F. & Heberlein, U. Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11352–11357 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziemann, A. E. et al. The amygdala is a chemosensor that detects carbon dioxide and acidosis to elicit fear behavior. Cell 139, 1012–1021 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, A. L. et al. The cells and logic for mammalian sour taste detection. Nature 442, 934–938 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vosshall, L. B., Wong, A. M. & Axel, R. An olfactory sensory map in the fly brain. Cell 102, 147–159 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Larsson, M. C. et al. Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction. Neuron 43, 703–714 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Metaxakis, A., Oehler, S., Klinakis, A. & Savakis, C. Minos as a genetic and genomic tool in Drosophila melanogaster . Genetics 171, 571–581 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Asahina, K., Louis, M., Piccinotti, S. & Vosshall, L. B. A circuit supporting concentration-invariant odor perception in Drosophila . J. Biol. 8, 9 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Dus for helpful discussions and technical support for making anti-IR64a antibody; M. Kim for technical assistance; J. Treisman, N. Ringstad, C. Desplan, M. Warman, G. Fishell, M. Chesler, A. Wong, L. Vosshall and D. Anderson for discussions and comments on the manuscript; and R. Lehmann for sharing her two-photon microscope. This work was initiated in D. Anderson’s laboratory at California Institute of Technology. G.S.B.S. thanks H.-R. Song for support. Financial support was provided by a National Research Service Award fellowship (M.A.), the Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation (R. Bell), the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Y.G.), a European Research Council Starting Independent Researcher Grant (R. Benton), the Swiss National Science Foundation (R. Benton), the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (G.S.), the Whitehall Foundation (G.S.), a Whitehead President Award (G.S.) and NIH grant 1RO1GM089746 (G.S).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yael Grosjean & Charlotte Leblanc

    Present address: Present addresses: Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l’Alimentation, UMR-6265 CNRS, UMR-1324 INRA, Université de Bourgogne, 6 Boulevard Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France (Y.G.); Université Paris Diderot – Paris 7, 16 rue Marguerite Duras, 75013 Paris, France (C.L.).,

  2. Minrong Ai and Soohong Min: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell Biology, Molecular Neurobiology Program, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, 10016, New York, USA

    Minrong Ai, Soohong Min, Charlotte Leblanc & Greg S. B. Suh

  2. Center for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland

    Yael Grosjean, Rati Bell & Richard Benton

Authors
  1. Minrong Ai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soohong Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yael Grosjean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Charlotte Leblanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rati Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Richard Benton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Greg S. B. Suh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.S.B.S. identified the GC16-GAL4 line from a screen and performed initial imaging experiments. M.A. generated most of the transgenic flies, performed calcium imaging and some behavioural experiments, and conducted immunohistochemistry. S.M. performed most of the behavioural testing and immunohistochemistry. C.L. assisted in characterizing IR64a mutant alleles. Y.G., R. Bell and R. Benton generated IR64a-GAL4 and UAS-IR64a transgenic flies and showed that IR64a+ neurons innervate the DC4 and DP1m glomeruli. M.A. and G.S.B.S. analysed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript with inputs from all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg S. B. Suh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Figures 1-6 with legends and Supplementary Tables 1-2. (PDF 3927 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ai, M., Min, S., Grosjean, Y. et al. Acid sensing by the Drosophila olfactory system. Nature 468, 691–695 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09537

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09537

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing