Abstract
Arising from J. H. Lee et al. Nature 465, 788–792 (2010)10.1038/nature09108; Lee et al. reply
In a recent Letter to Nature, Lee and colleagues1 combined optogenetic stimulation with functional magnetic resonance imaging (ofMRI) to examine the relationship between pyramidal-cell spiking and the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal. To do so, they injected an adeno-associated viral vector into the primary motor cortex (M1) of adult rats to drive the expression of channelrhodopsin (ChR2) in cortical projection neurons, thus making them sensitive to light1. The authors then used combined light stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the effects of selective activation of the light-sensitive pyramidal cells on the BOLD signal, as well as to probe the value of this methodology for mapping brain connectivity. They found that excitation of these neurons induced positive BOLD signals both in the injected M1 region and in remote target thalamic nuclei receiving direct projections from that region, and concluded that ofMRI reliably links positive BOLD signals with increased local neuronal excitation. However, their analysis neglects the almost immediate activation of other circuits that could lead to the generation of BOLD signals through local perisynaptic rather than spiking activity. Their experiments therefore do not pin down the identity of the specific neuronal signals that give rise to the BOLD signal.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee, J. H. et al. Global and local fMRI signals driven by neurons defined optogenetically by type and wiring. Nature 465, 788–792 (2010)
Douglas, R. J. & Martin, K. A. C. Recurrent neuronal circuits in the neocortex. Curr. Biol. 17, R496–R500 (2007)
Markram, H. et al. Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5, 793–807 (2004)
Somogyi, P., Tamas, G., Lujan, R. & Buhl, E. H. Salient features of synaptic organisation in the cerebral cortex. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 26, 113–135 (1998)
Douglas, R. J., Martin, K. A. & Whitteridge, D. An intracellular analysis of the visual responses of neurones in cat visual cortex. J. Physiol. 440, 659–696 (1991)
Keller, A. Intrinsic synaptic organization of the motor cortex. Cereb. Cortex 3, 430–441 (1993)
Sohal, V. S., Zhang, F., Yizhar, O. & Deisseroth, K. Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance. Nature 459, 698–702 (2009)
Cardin, J. A. et al. Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature 459, 663–667 (2009)
Han, X. et al. Millisecond-timescale optical control of neural dynamics in the nonhuman primate brain. Neuron 62, 191–198 (2009)
Jueptner, M. & Weiller, C. Review: does measurement of regional cerebral blood flow reflect synaptic activity? Implications for PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 2, 148–156 (1995)
Phillips, C. G. Actions of antidromic pyramidal volleys on single Betz cells in the cat. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. Cogn. Med. Sci. 44, 1–25 (1959)
Ferster, D. & Lindstrom, S. Synaptic excitation of neurones in area 17 of the cat by intracortical axon collaterals of cortico-geniculate cells. J. Physiol. 367, 233–252 (1985)
Okun, M. & Lampl, I. Instantaneous correlation of excitation and inhibition during ongoing and sensory-evoked activities. Nature Neurosci. 11, 535–537 (2008)
Logothetis, N. K. & Wandell, B. A. Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 66, 735–769 (2004)
Logothetis, N. K. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453, 869–878 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Competing financial interests: declared none.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Logothetis, N. Bold claims for optogenetics. Nature 468, E3–E4 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09532
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09532
This article is cited by
-
Different forms of effective connectivity in primate frontotemporal pathways
Nature Communications (2015)
-
Neural and Hemodynamic Responses to Optogenetic and Sensory Stimulation in the Rat Somatosensory Cortex
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2015)
-
Patterned Optogenetic Modulation of Neurovascular and Metabolic Signals
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2015)
-
Laminar activity in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex related to novelty and episodic encoding
Nature Communications (2014)
-
Optogenetics in psychiatric animal models
Cell and Tissue Research (2013)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.