The giant bite of a new raptorial sperm whale from the Miocene epoch of Peru

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 26 August 2010


The modern giant sperm whale Physeter macrocephalus, one of the largest known predators, preys upon cephalopods at great depths1,2. Lacking a functional upper dentition, it relies on suction for catching its prey3; in contrast, several smaller Miocene sperm whales (Physeteroidea) have been interpreted as raptorial (versus suction) feeders4,5, analogous to the modern killer whale Orcinus orca. Whereas very large physeteroid teeth have been discovered in various Miocene localities, associated diagnostic cranial remains have not been found so far6,7,8. Here we report the discovery of a new giant sperm whale from the Middle Miocene of Peru (approximately 12–13 million years ago), Leviathan melvillei, described on the basis of a skull with teeth and mandible. With a 3-m-long head, very large upper and lower teeth (maximum diameter and length of 12 cm and greater than 36 cm, respectively), robust jaws and a temporal fossa considerably larger than in Physeter, this stem physeteroid represents one of the largest raptorial predators and, to our knowledge, the biggest tetrapod bite ever found. The appearance of gigantic raptorial sperm whales in the fossil record coincides with a phase of diversification and size-range increase of the baleen-bearing mysticetes in the Miocene. We propose that Leviathan fed mostly on high-energy content medium-size baleen whales. As a top predator, together with the contemporaneous giant shark Carcharocles megalodon, it probably had a profound impact on the structuring of Miocene marine communities. The development of a vast supracranial basin in Leviathan, extending on the rostrum as in Physeter, might indicate the presence of an enlarged spermaceti organ in the former that is not associated with deep diving or obligatory suction feeding.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Skull, mandible and tooth morphology of the holotype of L. melvillei MUSM 1676.
Figure 2: Phylogeny of physeteroids illustrating the relationships of Leviathan with other stem physeteroids, physeterids and kogiids.
Figure 3: Comparison of the outline of the skull and mandible of Leviathan with modern giant sperm whale Physeter and killer whale Orcinus.
Figure 4: Evolution of the diversity and size of mysticetes from Oligocene to present.


  1. 1

    Rice, D. W. in Handbook of Marine Mammals Vol. 56 (eds Ridgway, S. H. & Harrison, R.) 177–233 (Academic, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Watwood, S. L., Miller, P. J. O., Johnson, M., Madsen, P. T. & Tyack, P. L. Deep-diving behaviour of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 814–825 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Werth, A. J. Functional anatomy of the sperm whale tongue, with reference to suction feeding. Aquat. Mamm. 30, 405–418 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Bianucci, G. & Landini, W. Killer sperm whale: a new basal physeteroid (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the Late Miocene of Italy. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 148, 103–131 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Lambert, O., Bianucci, G. & de Muizon, C. A new stem-sperm whale (Cetacea, Odontoceti, Physeteroidea) from the latest Miocene of Peru. C. R. Palevol. 7, 361–369 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Leidy, J. Description of vertebrate remains, chiefly from the phosphate beds of South Carolina. J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 8, 209–261 (1877)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Abel, O. Les Odontocètes du Boldérien (Miocène supérieur) des environs d’Anvers. Mém. Mus. R. Hist. Nat. Belg. 3, 1–155 (1905)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Kellogg, R. Two fossil physeteroid whales from California. Contr. Paleontol. Carnegie Inst. Wash. 348, 1–34 (1925)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Kato, H. Observation of tooth scars on the head of male sperm whale, as an indication of intra-sexual fighting. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 35, 39–46 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Whitehead, H. Sperm Whales: Social Evolution in the Ocean (Univ. Chicago Press, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Hirota, K. & Barnes, L. G. A new species of Middle Miocene sperm whale of the genus Scaldicetus (Cetacea; Physeteridae) from Shiga-Mura, Japan. Isl. Arc 3, 453–472 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Caldwell, D. K. & Caldwell, M. C. in Handbook of Marine Mammals Vol. 4 (eds Ridgway, S. H. & Harrison, R.) 235–260 (Academic, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Hohn, A. A. in Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals 2nd edn (eds Perrin, W. F., Würsig, B. & Thewissen, J. G. M.) 11–18 (Academic, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Taylor, M. A. Functional anatomy of the head of the large aquatic predator Rhomaleosaurus zetlandicus (Plesiosauria, Reptilia) from the Toarcian (Lower Jurassic) of Yorkshire, England. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 335, 247–280 (1992)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Dalheim, M. E. & Heyning, J. E. in Handbook of Marine Mammals Vol. 6 (eds Ridgway, S. H. & Harrison, R.) 281–322 (Academic, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Werth, A. J. in Feeding: Form, Function, and Evolution in Tetrapod Vertebrates (ed. Schwenk, K.) 487–526 (Academic, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Jefferson, T. A., Stacey, P. J. & Baird, R. W. A review of killer whale interactions with other marine mammals: predation to co-existence. Mammal Rev. 21, 151–180 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Reeves, R. R., Berger, J. & Clapham, P. J. in Whales, Whaling, and Ocean Ecosystems (eds Estes J. A. et al.) 174–187 (Univ. California Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Brand, L. R., Esperante, R., Chadwick, A. V., Pomas, O. & Alomía, M. Fossil whale preservation implies high diatom accumulation rate in the Miocene–Pliocene Pisco Formation of Peru. Geology 32, 165–168 (2004)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Uhen, M. D. & Pyenson, N. D. Diversity estimates, biases, and historiographic effects: resolving cetacean diversity in the Tertiary. Palaeontol. Electronica 10, 11–22 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Marx, F. G. Marine mammals through time: when less is more in studying palaeodiversity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276, 887–892 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Lindberg, D. R. & Pyenson, N. D. in Whales, Whaling, and Ocean Ecosystems (eds Estes J. A. et al.) 67–81 (Univ. California Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Fordyce, R. E. & de Muizon, C. in Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapods to Life in Water (eds Mazin, J.-M. & de Buffrénil, V.) 169–233 (Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Hone, D. W. E. & Benton, M. J. The evolution of large size: how does Cope's Rule work? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 4–6 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Purdy, R. 1996. in Great White Sharks: the Biology of Carcharodon carcharias (eds Klimley, A. P. & Ainley D. G.) 67–78 (Academic, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Williams, T. M., Estes, J. A., Doak, D. F. & Springer, A. M. Killer appetites: assessing the role of predators in ecological communities. Ecology 85, 3373–3384 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Springer, A. M. et al. Sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific Ocean: an ongoing legacy of industrial whaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12223–12228 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Cranford, T. W. The sperm whale's nose: sexual selection on a grand scale? Mar. Mamm. Sci. 15, 1133–1157 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Carrier, D. R., Deban, S. M. & Otterstrom, J. The face that sank the Essex: potential function of the spermaceti organ in aggression. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 1755–1763 (2002)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E. & Billups, K. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–693 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank W. Aguirre, A. Altamirano, E. Díaz, A. Martínez and N. Valencia for assistance during fieldwork and preparation of the specimen; C. Letenneur for the reconstruction of Leviathan; P. Loubry for the photo of the tooth of Orcinus; D. J. Bohaska, G. Lenglet, J. G. Mead, C. Potter, H. van der Es, R. van Zelst and A. Varola for access to collections; M. D. Uhen for his compilation of cetacean data in The Paleobiology Database, and the Board of the Natuurhistorisch Museum Rotterdam Foundation for financial support of our research on fossil cetaceans in Peru. The work of O.L. at IRSNB was funded by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office.

Author information




O.L., G.B., K.P., M.U., R.S.-G. and J.R. took part in the fieldwork. R.S.-G. and M.U. organized the rescue and preparation of the specimen. O.L., G.B., K.P., C.M. and J.R. carried out the interpretation of the specimen. O.L. and G.B. undertook the phylogenetic analysis. G.B., O.L., K.P. and R.S.-G. collected the data on the size of mysticetes. G.B. undertook the statistical analyses and prepared the illustrations. O.L. wrote the paper. G.B., K.P., C.M. and J.R. discussed the results and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Olivier Lambert or Giovanni Bianucci.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Information, Supplementary Figures 1 - 10 with legends, Supplementary Tables 1 - 10 and References. (PDF 17674 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambert, O., Bianucci, G., Post, K. et al. The giant bite of a new raptorial sperm whale from the Miocene epoch of Peru. Nature 466, 105–108 (2010).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing