One of the most pervasive themes in ecology is that biological diversity stabilizes ecosystem processes and the services they provide to society1,2,3,4, a concept that has become a common argument for biodiversity conservation5. Species-rich communities are thought to produce more temporally stable ecosystem services because of the complementary or independent dynamics among species that perform similar ecosystem functions6. Such variance dampening within communities is referred to as a portfolio effect7 and is analogous to the effects of asset diversity on the stability of financial portfolios8. In ecology, these arguments have focused on the effects of species diversity on ecosystem stability but have not considered the importance of biologically relevant diversity within individual species9. Current rates of population extirpation are probably at least three orders of magnitude higher than species extinction rates10, so there is a pressing need to clarify how population and life history diversity affect the performance of individual species in providing important ecosystem services. Here we use five decades of data from Oncorhynchus nerka (sockeye salmon) in Bristol Bay, Alaska, to provide the first quantification of portfolio effects that derive from population and life history diversity in an important and heavily exploited species. Variability in annual Bristol Bay salmon returns is 2.2 times lower than it would be if the system consisted of a single homogenous population rather than the several hundred discrete populations it currently consists of. Furthermore, if it were a single homogeneous population, such increased variability would lead to ten times more frequent fisheries closures. Portfolio effects are also evident in watershed food webs, where they stabilize and extend predator access to salmon resources. Our results demonstrate the critical importance of maintaining population diversity for stabilizing ecosystem services and securing the economies and livelihoods that depend on them. The reliability of ecosystem services will erode faster than indicated by species loss alone.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
MacArthur, R. H. Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36, 533–536 (1955)
Elton, C. S. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (Chapman & Hall, 1958)
Hooper, D. U. et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 3–35 (2005)
Chapin, F. S. et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405, 234–242 (2000)
Duffy, J. E. Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ 7, 437–444 (2009)
Tilman, D. Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77, 350–363 (1996)
Figge, F. Bio-folio: applying portfolio theory to biodiversity. Biodivers. Conserv. 13, 827–849 (2004)
Markowitz, H. Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7, 77–91 (1952)
Luck, G. W., Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R. Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 331–336 (2003)
Hughes, J. B., Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R. Population diversity: its extent and extinction. Science 278, 689–692 (1997)
Hilborn, R., Quinn, T. P., Schindler, D. E. & Rogers, D. E. Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6564–6568 (2003)
Hutchinson, W. F. The dangers of ignoring stock complexity in fishery management: the case of the North Sea cod. Biol. Lett. 4, 693–695 (2008)
Quinn, T. P. The Behavior and Ecology of Pacific Salmon and Trout (Univ. Washington Press, 2005)
Doak, D. F. et al. The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology. Am. Nat. 151, 264–276 (1998)
Mantua, N. J. & Hare, S. R. The Pacific decadal oscillation. J. Oceanogr. 58, 35–44 (2002)
Schindler, D. E. et al. Climate change, ecosystem impacts, and management for Pacific salmon. Fisheries 33, 502–506 (2008)
Gende, S. M., Edwards, R. T., Willson, M. F. & Wipfli, M. S. Pacific salmon in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Bioscience 52, 917–928 (2002)
Naiman, R. J., Bilby, R. E., Schindler, D. E. & Helfield, J. M. Pacific salmon, nutrients, and the dynamics of freshwater and riparian ecosystems. Ecosystems (NY, Print) 5, 399–417 (2002)
Schindler, D. E., Leavitt, P. R., Brock, C. S., Johnson, S. P. & Quay, P. D. Marine-derived nutrients, commercial fisheries, and production of salmon and lake algae in Alaska. Ecology 86, 3225–3231 (2005)
Helfield, J. M. & Naiman, R. J. Keystone interactions: salmon and bear in riparian forests of Alaska. Ecosystems (NY, Print) 9, 167–180 (2006)
Payne, L. X. & Moore, J. M. Mobile scavengers create hotspots of freshwater productivity. Oikos 115, 69–80 (2006)
Olsen, E. M. et al. Small-scale biocomplexity in coastal Atlantic cod supporting a Darwinian perspective on fisheries management. Evol. Appl. 1, 524–533 (2008)
Dixson, D. L. et al. Coral reef fish smell leaves to find island homes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275, 2831–2839 (2008)
Rooker, J. R. et al. Natal homing and connectivity in Atlantic bluefin tuna populations. Science 322, 742–744 (2008)
Gustafson, R. G. et al. Pacific salmon extinctions: quantifying lost and remaining diversity. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1009–1020 (2007)
Lindley, S. T. et al. What Caused the Sacramento River Fall Chinook Stock Collapse? Pre-publication report (Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2009); available at 〈http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/media/salmondeclinereport.pdf〉.
Moore, J. W., McClure, M., Rogers, L. A. & Schindler, D. E. Synchronization and portfolio performance of threatened salmon. Conserv. Lett. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00119.x. (in the press)
Folke, C. et al. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 35, 557–581 (2004)
West, F. W. & Fair, L. F. Abundance, Age, Sex, and Size Statistics for Pacific Salmon in Bristol Bay, 2003. Fishery Data Series No. 06–47 (Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 2006)
Rogers, L. A. & Schindler, D. E. Asynchrony in population dynamics in sockeye salmon of southwest Alaska. Oikos 117, 1578–1586 (2008)
Pyper, B. J. & Peterman, R. M. Comparison of methods to account for autocorrelation in correlation analyses of fish data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 2127–2140 (1998)
We thank the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the US National Science Foundation, the University of Washington, the Alaska salmon processing industry and the H. Mason Keeler Professorship for support for this work. N. Baron, L. Neeley and S. Sethi provided feedback and comments on the manuscript, and P. Lisi and G. Holtgrieve helped prepare the figures.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This file contains Supplementary Information comprising: Value of sockeye salmon resources in Bristol Bay and Variance scaling in data, Supplementary Figures 1-3 with legends and References. (PDF 273 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Schindler, D., Hilborn, R., Chasco, B. et al. Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature 465, 609–612 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09060
Body-size dependent foraging strategies in the Christmas Island flying-fox: implications for seed and pollen dispersal within a threatened island ecosystem
Movement Ecology (2022)
Optimal Channel Networks accurately model ecologically-relevant geomorphological features of branching river networks
Communications Earth & Environment (2022)
Retrospective genomics highlights changes in genetic composition of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) and potential loss of a south-eastern Australia population
Scientific Reports (2022)
Environmental Biology of Fishes (2022)
Indications of polymorphism in the behaviour and morphology of burbot (Lota lota) in a European lake