Letter | Published:

The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification

Nature volume 464, pages 13341337 (29 April 2010) | Download Citation

Abstract

The rise in Arctic near-surface air temperatures has been almost twice as large as the global average in recent decades1,2,3—a feature known as ‘Arctic amplification’. Increased concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases have driven Arctic and global average warming1,4; however, the underlying causes of Arctic amplification remain uncertain. The roles of reductions in snow and sea ice cover5,6,7 and changes in atmospheric and oceanic circulation8,9,10, cloud cover and water vapour11,12 are still matters of debate. A better understanding of the processes responsible for the recent amplified warming is essential for assessing the likelihood, and impacts, of future rapid Arctic warming and sea ice loss13,14. Here we show that the Arctic warming is strongest at the surface during most of the year and is primarily consistent with reductions in sea ice cover. Changes in cloud cover, in contrast, have not contributed strongly to recent warming. Increases in atmospheric water vapour content, partly in response to reduced sea ice cover, may have enhanced warming in the lower part of the atmosphere during summer and early autumn. We conclude that diminishing sea ice has had a leading role in recent Arctic temperature amplification. The findings reinforce suggestions that strong positive ice–temperature feedbacks have emerged in the Arctic15, increasing the chances of further rapid warming and sea ice loss, and will probably affect polar ecosystems, ice-sheet mass balance and human activities in the Arctic2.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al., eds. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007)

  2. 2.

    , , eds. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004)

  3. 3.

    & The Arctic amplification debate. Clim. Change 76, 241–264 (2006)

  4. 4.

    et al. Attribution of polar warming to human influence. Nature Geosci. 1, 750–754 (2008)

  5. 5.

    , , , & Arctic sea ice decline: faster than forecast. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 10.1029/2007GL029703 (2007)

  6. 6.

    , & Perspectives of the Arctic’s shrinking ice cover. Science 315, 1533–1536 (2007)

  7. 7.

    , , & Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35 10.1029/2007GL031972 (2008)

  8. 8.

    , , , & Vertical structure of recent Arctic warming. Nature 451, 53–56 (2008)

  9. 9.

    & Extraordinary September Arctic sea ice reductions and their relationships with storm behavior over 1979–2008. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36 10.1029/2009GL039810 (2009)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Arctic air temperature change amplification and the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36 10.1029/2009GL038777 (2009)

  11. 11.

    , , & Relationships between Arctic sea ice and clouds during autumn. J. Clim. 21, 4799–4810 (2008)

  12. 12.

    & Changes in the fabric of the Arctic’s greenhouse blanket. Environ. Res. Lett. 2 10.1088/1748–9326/2/4/045011 (2007)

  13. 13.

    , & Future abrupt reductions in the summer Arctic sea ice. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 10.1029/2006GL028024 (2006)

  14. 14.

    , & September sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100. Nature Geosci. 2, 341–343 (2009)

  15. 15.

    , , , & The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification. Cryosphere 3, 11–19 (2009)

  16. 16.

    & Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models. Clim. Dyn. 21, 221–232 (2003)

  17. 17.

    Amplified climate change: what does surface albedo feedback have to do with it? Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 10.1029/2005GL025244 (2006)

  18. 18.

    & Seasonality of polar surface warming amplification in climate simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36 10.1029/2009GL040133 (2009)

  19. 19.

    & Polar amplification in a coupled model with locked albedo. Clim. Dyn. 33, 629–643 (2009)

  20. 20.

    , & Current GCMs’ unrealistic negative feedback in the Arctic. J. Clim. 22, 4682–4695 (2009)

  21. 21.

    , & Recent and future changes of the Arctic sea-ice cover. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35 10.1029/2008GL034813 (2008)

  22. 22.

    , , & The seasonal atmospheric response to projected Arctic sea ice loss in the late twenty-first century. J. Clim. 23, 333–351 (2010)

  23. 23.

    Arctic tropospheric warming amplification? Nature 455, E1–E2 (2008)

  24. 24.

    , & Recent Arctic warming vertical structure contested. Nature 455, E2–E3 (2008)

  25. 25.

    & Arctic warming aloft is data set dependent. Nature 455, E3–E4 (2008)

  26. 26.

    & Variational bias correction of satellite radiance data in the ERA-Interim reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135, 1830–1841 (2009)

  27. 27.

    & Impacts of reduced sea ice on winter Arctic atmospheric circulation, precipitation and temperature. J. Geophys. Res. 114 10.1029/2009JD011884 (2009)

  28. 28.

    & Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958–2008. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36 10.1029/2009GL039035 (2009)

  29. 29.

    , , , & Arctic sea ice retreat in 2007 follows thinning trend. J. Clim. 22, 165–176 (2009)

  30. 30.

    et al. An annual cycle of Arctic surface cloud forcing at SHEBA. J. Geophys. Res. 107 10.1029/2000JC000439 (2002)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank N. Gillett and R. Graversen for comments on the manuscript. The ERA-Interim data were obtained from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts data server. Parts of this research were supported by funding from the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia

    • James A. Screen
    •  & Ian Simmonds

Authors

  1. Search for James A. Screen in:

  2. Search for Ian Simmonds in:

Contributions

The analysis was performed and the manuscript written by J.A.S. Both authors contributed with ideas and discussions.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Screen.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains a Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Figures 1-2 with legends, Supplementary Table 1 and References.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09051

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.