Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Seismic evidence for widespread western-US deep-crustal deformation caused by extension


Laboratory experiments have established that many of the materials comprising the Earth are strongly anisotropic in terms of seismic-wave speeds1. Observations of azimuthal2,3 and radial4,5 anisotropy in the upper mantle are attributed to the lattice-preferred orientation of olivine caused by the shear strains associated with deformation, and provide some of the most direct evidence for deformation and flow within the Earth’s interior. Although observations of crustal radial anisotropy would improve our understanding of crustal deformation and flow patterns resulting from tectonic processes, large-scale observations have been limited to regions of particularly thick crust6. Here we show that observations from ambient noise tomography in the western United States reveal strong deep (middle to lower)-crustal radial anisotropy that is confined mainly to the geological provinces that have undergone significant extension during the Cenozoic Era (since 65 Myr ago)7,8. The coincidence of crustal radial anisotropy with the extensional provinces of the western United States suggests that the radial anisotropy results from the lattice-preferred orientation of anisotropic crustal minerals caused by extensional deformation. These observations also provide support for the hypothesis that the deep crust within these regions has undergone widespread and relatively uniform strain in response to crustal thinning and extension9,10,11.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Major tectonic regions and example surface-wave dispersion in the study region.
Figure 2: Mis-fit to surface-wave dispersion data from inversions I and II, which do not include crustal radial anisotropy.
Figure 3: Crustal radial anisotropy within the extensional provinces is required despite a trade-off between the amplitudes of crustal and mantle radial anisotropy.
Figure 4: Data mis-fit and the amplitude of radial anisotropy in the crust and upper mantle using inversion III.


  1. Siegesmund, S., Takeshita, T. & Kern, H. Anisotropy of V P and V S in an amphibolite of the deeper crust and its relationship to the mineralogical, microstructural and textural characteristics of the rock. Tectonophysics 157, 25–38 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Montagner, J.-P. & Tanimoto, T. Global upper mantle tomography of seismic velocities and anisotropies. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 20,337–20,351 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Silver, P. G. Seismic anisotropy beneath the continents: probing the depths of geology. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 24, 385–421 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ekström, G. & Dziewonski, A. M. The unique anisotropy of the Pacific upper mantle. Nature 394, 168–172 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shapiro, N. M. & Ritzwoller, M. H. Monte-Carlo inversion for a global shear-velocity model of the crust and upper mantle. Geophys. J. Int. 151, 88–105 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shapiro, N. M., Ritzwoller, M. H., Molnar, P. H. & Levin, V. Thinning and flow of Tibetan crust constrained by seismic anisotropy. Science 305, 233–236 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wernicke, B. in The Cordilleran Orogen: Conterminous US (eds Burchfiel, B. C., Lipman, P. W. & Zoback, M. L.) 553–581 (Geol. Soc. Am., 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Janecke, S. U. Translation and breakup of supradetachment basins: lessons from Grasshopper, Horse Prairie, Medicine Lodge, Muddy Creek and Nicholia Creek Basins, SW Montana. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 36, 546 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Block, L. & Royden, L. H. Core complex geometries and regional scale flow in the lower crust. Tectonics 9, 557–567 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bird, P. Lateral extrusion of the lower crust from under high topography, in the isostatic limit. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 10,275–10,286 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kruse, S., McNutt, M., Phipps-Morgan, J., Royden, L. & Wernicke, B. Lithospheric extension near Lake Mead, Nevada: a model for ductile flow in the lower crust. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 4435–4456 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sabra, K. G., Gerstoft, P., Roux, P., Kuperman, W. A. & Fehler, M. C. Surface wave tomography from microseisms in Southern California. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L14311 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shapiro, N. M., Campillo, M., Stehly, L. & Ritzwoller, M. H. High-resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise. Science 307, 1615–1618 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, Y., Ritzwoller, M. H., Lin, F.-C., Moschetti, M. P. & Shapiro, N. M. The structure of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the western US revealed by ambient noise and earthquake tomography. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B12310 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bensen, G. D. et al. Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements. Geophys. J. Int. 169, 1239–1260 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moschetti, M. P., Ritzwoller, M. H. & Shapiro, N. M. Surface wave tomography of the western United States from ambient seismic noise: Rayleigh wave group velocity maps. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 8, Q08010 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin, F., Moschetti, M. P. & Ritzwoller, M. H. Surface wave tomography of the western United States from ambient seismic noise: Rayleigh and Love wave phase velocity maps. Geophys. J. Int. 173, 281–298 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, Y. & Ritzwoller, M. H. Teleseismic surface wave tomography in the western US using the Transportable Array component of USArray. Geophys. Res. Lett. 5, L04308 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barmin, M. P., Ritzwoller, M. H. & Levshin, A. L. A fast and reliable method for surface wave tomography. Pure Appl. Geophys. 158, 1351–1375 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Masters, G., Barmine, M. P. & Kientz, S. Mineos: User Manual (Calif. Inst. Technol., 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sambridge, M. Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm – I. Searching a parameter space. Geophys. J. Int. 138, 479–494 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nettles, M. & Dziewonski, A. M. Radially anisotropic shear velocity structure of the upper mantle globally and beneath North America. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B02303 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moschetti, M. P., Ritzwoller, M. H., Lin, F. & Yang, Y. Crustal shear velocity structure of the western US inferred from ambient seismic noise and earthquake data. J. Geophys. Res. (submitted)

  24. Silver, P. G. & Holt, W. E. The mantle flow field beneath western North America. Science 295, 1054–1057 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Becker, T. W., Schulte-Pelkum, V., Blackman, D. K., Kelloff, J. B. & O’Connell, R. J. Mantle flow under the western United States from shear wave splitting. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 247, 235–251 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mainprice, D. & Nicolas, A. Development of shape and lattice preferred orientations: application to the seismic anisotropy of the lower crust. J. Struct. Geol. 11, 175–189 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rasolofosaon, P. N. J., Rabbel, W., Siegesmund, S. & Vollbrecht, A. Characterization of crack distribution: fabric analysis versus ultrasonic inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 141, 413–424 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss, T., Siegesmund, S., Rabbel, W., Bohlen, T. & Pohl, M. Seismic velocities and anisotropy of the lower continental crust: a review. Pure Appl. Geophys. 156, 97–122 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Love, A. E. H. A Treatise on the Theory of Elasticity 4th edn, 298–300 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1927)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gilbert, H. J. & Fouch, M. J. Complex upper mantle seismic structure across the southern Colorado Plateau/Basin and Range II: results from receiver function analysis. Eos 88 (Fall meeting), abstr. S41B–0558 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Levshin, A. L., Pisarenko, V. F. & Pogrebinsky, G. A. On a frequency-time analysis of oscillations. Ann. Geophys. 28, 211–218 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Forsyth, D. & Li, A. in Seismic Earth: Array Analysis of Broadband Seismograms (eds Levander, A. & Nolet, G.) 81–97 (Geophys. Monogr. 157, Am. Geophys. Union, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lin, F., Ritzwoller, M. H. & Snieder, R. Eikonal tomography: surface wave tomography by phase front tracking across a regional broad-band seismic array. Geophys. J. Int. 177, 1091–1110 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This manuscript benefited from discussions with K. Mahan, C. Jones and P. Molnar. Research was supported by the US National Science Foundation, Division of Earth Sciences. M.P.M. received support from an US National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship from the American Society for Engineering Education. The facilities of the IRIS Data Management System, and specifically the IRIS Data Management Center, were used to access the waveform and metadata required in this study.

Author Contributions M.P.M. carried out ambient noise tomography for the Rayleigh-wave measurements, performed the three-dimensional inversion of surface-wave dispersion measurements and co-wrote the paper. M.H.R. guided the study design and co-wrote the paper. F.L. carried out ambient noise tomography for the Love-wave measurements. Y.Y. carried out the multiple-plane-wave earthquake tomography. All authors discussed the results and provided comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. P. Moschetti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Information: Inability of additional parameters to resolve the Rayleigh-Love discrepancy, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figures 1-6 with legends and Supplementary References. (PDF 1729 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moschetti, M., Ritzwoller, M., Lin, F. et al. Seismic evidence for widespread western-US deep-crustal deformation caused by extension. Nature 464, 885–889 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing