Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

‘Memristive’ switches enable ‘stateful’ logic operations via material implication

Abstract

The authors of the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors1—the industry consensus set of goals established for advancing silicon integrated circuit technology—have challenged the computing research community to find new physical state variables (other than charge or voltage), new devices, and new architectures that offer memory and logic functions1,2,3,4,5,6 beyond those available with standard transistors. Recently, ultra-dense resistive memory arrays built from various two-terminal semiconductor or insulator thin film devices have been demonstrated7,8,9,10,11,12. Among these, bipolar voltage-actuated switches have been identified as physical realizations of ‘memristors’ or memristive devices, combining the electrical properties of a memory element and a resistor13,14. Such devices were first hypothesized by Chua in 1971 (ref. 15), and are characterized by one or more state variables16 that define the resistance of the switch depending upon its voltage history. Here we show that this family of nonlinear dynamical memory devices can also be used for logic operations: we demonstrate that they can execute material implication (IMP), which is a fundamental Boolean logic operation on two variables p and q such that pIMPq is equivalent to (NOTp)ORq. Incorporated within an appropriate circuit17,18, memristive switches can thus perform ‘stateful’ logic operations for which the same devices serve simultaneously as gates (logic) and latches19 (memory) that use resistance instead of voltage or charge as the physical state variable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Characterization of memristive switches.
Figure 2: Illustration of the IMP operation for the four input values of p and q.
Figure 3: The logic operation s  ←  p NAND q performed as a sequential operation with three memristive switches.

References

  1. International. Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS). Emerging Research Devices. ITRS technical report 〈http://www.itrs.net/Links/2009ITRS/2009Chapters_2009Tables/2009_ERD.pdf〉 (2009)

  2. Allwood, D. A. et al. Magnetic domain-wall logic. Science 309, 1688–1692 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dery, H., Dalal, P., Cywinski, L. & Sham, L. J. Spin-based logic in semiconductors for reconfigurable large-scale circuits. Nature 447, 573–576 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ney, A., Pampuch, C., Koch, R. & Ploog, K. H. Programmable computing with a single magnetoresistive element. Nature 425, 485–487 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, J., Meng, H. & Wang, J. P. Programmable spintronics logic device based on a magnetic tunnel junction element. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10D509 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kimura, H. et al. Complementary ferroelectric-capacitor logic for low-power logic-in-memory VLSI. IEEE Solid-State Circuit. 39, 919–926 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Y. et al. Nanoscale molecular-switch crossbar circuits. Nanotechnology 14, 462–468 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, Y. et al. Nanoscale molecular-switch devices fabricated by imprint lithography. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1610–1612 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jung, G.-Y. et al. Circuit fabrication at 17 nm half-pitch by nano-imprint lithography. Nano Lett. 6, 351–354 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jung, G. Y. et al. Fabrication of a 34 x 34 crossbar structure at 50 nm half-pitch by UV-based nano-imprint lithography. Nano Lett. 4, 1225–1229 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Green, J. E. et al. A 160-kilobit molecular electronic memory patterned at 1011 bits per square centimetre. Nature 445, 414–417 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waser, R., Dittman, R., Staikov, G. & Szot, K. Redox-based resistive switching memories—nanoionic mechanism, prospects, and challenges. Adv. Mater. 21, 2632–2663 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strukov, D. B., Snider, G. S., Stewart, D. R. & Williams, R. S. The missing memristor found. Nature 453, 80–83 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, J. J. et al. Memristive switching mechanism for metal/oxide/metal nanodevices. Nature Nanotechnol. 3, 429–433 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chua, L. O. Memristor—the missing circuit element. IEEE Trans. Circuit. Theor. CT-18, 507–519 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chua, L. O. & Kang, S. M. Memristive devices and systems. Proc. IEEE 64, 209–223 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snider, G. Computing with hysteretic resistor crossbars. Appl. Phys. A 80, 1165–1172 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Likharev, K. K. & Strukov, D. B. CMOL: Devices, Circuits, and Architectures. Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 680 (Springer, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuekes, P. J., Stewart, D. R. & Williams, R. S. The crossbar latch: logic value storage, restoration, and inversion in crossbar circuits. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 034301 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shannon, C. E. A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching Circuits. 1–17 Master’s thesis, MIT (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Whitehead, A. N. & Russell, B. Principia Mathematica Vol I, 7 (Cambridge University Press, 1910)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Borghetti, J. et al. Electrical transport and thermometry of electroformed titanium dioxide memristive switches. J. Appl. Phys. 106, 124504 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Borghetti, J. et al. A hybrid nanomemristor/transistor logic circuit capable of self-programming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1699–1703 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. DeHon, A. Array-based architecture for FET-based, nanoscale electronics. IEEE Trans. NanoTechnol. 2, 23–32 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Snider, G., Kuekes, P., Hogg, T. & Williams, R. S. Nanoelectronic architectures. Appl. Phys. A 80, 1183–1195 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stan, M., Franzon, P., Goldstein, S., Lach, J. & Ziegler, M. Molecular electronics: from devices and interconnect to circuits and architecture. Proc. IEEE 91, 1940–1957 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Heath, J. & Ratner, M. Molecular electronics. Phys. Today 56, 43–49 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Luo, Y. et al. Two-dimensional molecular electronics circuits. Chem. Phys. Chem. 3, 519–525 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, J. J. et al. The mechanism of electroforming of metal oxide memristive switches. Nanotechnology 20, 215201 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Straznicky for initial experimental work, R. Roth, W. Robinett and D. M. Strukov for discussions, and X. Li and D. Ohlberg for their expert device fabrication.

Author Contributions The memristive IMP gate was conceived by G.S.S., P.J.K. and R.S.W. J.B. and D.R.S. designed the experiments and J.B. performed the measurements. J.J.Y. prepared the memristors. J.B., D.R.S. and R.S.W. wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Duncan R. Stewart or R. Stanley Williams.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Figures S1-S5 with legends and Supplementary References for Supplementary Figure S4. (PDF 246 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borghetti, J., Snider, G., Kuekes, P. et al. ‘Memristive’ switches enable ‘stateful’ logic operations via material implication. Nature 464, 873–876 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08940

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08940

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing