Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genetic analysis of variation in transcription factor binding in yeast

Nature volume 464, pages 1187–1191 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Variation in transcriptional regulation is thought to be a major cause of phenotypic diversity1,2. Although widespread differences in gene expression among individuals of a species have been observed3,4,5,6,7,8, studies to examine the variability of transcription factor binding on a global scale have not been performed, and thus the extent and underlying genetic basis of transcription factor binding diversity is unknown. By mapping differences in transcription factor binding among individuals, here we present the genetic basis of such variation on a genome-wide scale. Whole-genome Ste12-binding profiles were determined using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with DNA sequencing in pheromone-treated cells of 43 segregants of a cross between two highly diverged yeast strains and their parental lines. We identified extensive Ste12-binding variation among individuals, and mapped underlying cis- and trans-acting loci responsible for such variation. We showed that most transcription factor binding variation is cis-linked, and that many variations are associated with polymorphisms residing in the binding motifs of Ste12 as well as those of several proposed Ste12 cofactors. We also identified two trans-factors, AMN1 and FLO8, that modulate Ste12 binding to promoters of more than ten genes under α-factor treatment. Neither of these two genes was previously known to regulate Ste12, and we suggest that they may be mediators of gene activity and phenotypic diversity. Ste12 binding strongly correlates with gene expression for more than 200 genes, indicating that binding variation is functional. Many of the variable-bound genes are involved in cell wall organization and biogenesis. Overall, these studies identified genetic regulators of molecular diversity among individuals and provide new insights into mechanisms of gene regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Extensive Ste12-binding variations among S288c × YJM789 derivatives.
Figure 2: Whole-genome linkage analysis of variable Ste12-binding traits.
Figure 3: Motif analysis of cis-variable binding regions.
Figure 4: Validation of two causative quantitative trait genes.
Figure 5: Ste12 binding significantly correlates with downstream gene expression.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

Raw data are deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE19636.

References

  1. King, M. C. & Wilson, A. C. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 188, 107–116 (1975)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennisi, E. Searching for the genome’s second code. Science 306, 632–635 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morley, M. et al. Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression. Nature 430, 743–747 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schadt, E. E. et al. Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature 422, 297–302 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brem, R. B., Yvert, G., Clinton, R. & Kruglyak, L. Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296, 752–755 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yvert, G. et al. Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nature Genet. 35, 57–64 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ronald, J., Brem, R. B., Whittle, J. & Kruglyak, L. Local regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 1, e25 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, Y. et al. Mapping determinants of gene expression plasticity by genetical genomics in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2, e222 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borneman, A. R. et al. Divergence of transcription factor binding sites across related yeast species. Science 317, 815–819 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson, M. D. et al. Species-specific transcription in mice carrying human chromosome 21. Science 322, 434–438 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts, C. J. et al. Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. Science 287, 873–880 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mancera, E. et al. High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454, 479–485 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. MacIsaac, K. D. et al. An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 113 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rockman, M. V. & Kruglyak, L. Genetics of global gene expression. Nature Rev. Genet. 7, 862–872 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang-Shum, J. J. et al. Relative contributions of MCM1 and STE12 to transcriptional activation of a- and α-specific genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 227, 197–204 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pramila, T. et al. Conserved homeodomain proteins interact with MADS box protein Mcm1 to restrict ECB-dependent transcription to the M/G1 phase of the cell cycle. Genes Dev. 16, 3034–3045 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jin, R., Dobry, C. J., McCown, P. J. & Kumar, A. Large-scale analysis of yeast filamentous growth by systematic gene disruption and overexpression. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 284–296 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kobayashi, O., Suda, H., Ohtani, T. & Sone, H. Molecular cloning and analysis of the dominant flocculation gene FLO8 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 251, 707–715 (1996)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smukalla, S. et al. FLO1 is a variable green beard gene that drives biofilm-like cooperation in budding yeast. Cell 135, 726–737 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, H., Styles, C. A. & Fink, G. R. Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C has a mutation in FLO8, a gene required for filamentous growth. Genetics 144, 967–978 (1996)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gimeno, C. J. & Fink, G. R. Induction of pseudohyphal growth by overexpression of PHD1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene related to transcriptional regulators of fungal development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 2100–2112 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rupp, S. et al. MAP kinase and cAMP filamentation signaling pathways converge on the unusually large promoter of the yeast FLO11 gene. EMBO J. 18, 1257–1269 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Borneman, A. R. et al. Target hub proteins serve as master regulators of development in yeast. Genes Dev. 20, 435–448 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ni, L. et al. Dynamic and complex transcription factor binding during an inducible response in yeast. Genes Dev. 23, 1351–1363 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lefrançois, P. et al. Efficient yeast ChIP-Seq using multiplex short-read DNA sequencing. BMC Genomics 10, 37 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gordon, D. B., Nekludova, L., McCallum, S. & Fraenkel, E. TAMO: a flexible, object-oriented framework for analyzing transcriptional regulation using DNA-sequence motifs. Bioinformatics 21, 3164–3165 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O. & Botstein, D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14863–14868 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wei, W. et al. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12825–12830 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Aparicio, O., Geisberg, J. V. & Struhl, K. Chromatin immunoprecipitation for determining the association of proteins with specific genomic sequences in vivo. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 17, Unit–17.7 (2004)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rozowsky, J. et al. PeakSeq enables systematic scoring of ChIP-seq experiments relative to controls. Nature Biotechnol. 27, 66–75 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Robertson, G. et al. Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nature Methods 4, 651–657 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Gagneur for comments on data analysis, the Cornell Microarray Facility for helping with the gene expression experiments, A. Lin for preprocessing of microarray data, C. Yellman for technical help, and Yale University Biomedical High Performance Computing Center (NIH grant RR19895) for providing computation resources. Research was funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants to M.S., H.Z. and L.M.S.

Author Contributions W.Z. and M.S. designed the study, E.M. and L.S. provided yeast strains, W.Z. performed experiments, W.Z. and H.Z. analysed the data, E.M., L.M.S. and M.S. provided suggestions in data analysis, and all authors co-wrote the paper.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wei Zheng

    Present address: Present address: Biostatics Resources, Keck Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.,

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University,

    Wei Zheng & Michael Snyder

  2. Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University,,

    Hongyu Zhao

  3. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA,

    Hongyu Zhao

  4. Genome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany

    Eugenio Mancera & Lars M. Steinmetz

  5. Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA,

    Michael Snyder

Authors
  1. Wei Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongyu Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eugenio Mancera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lars M. Steinmetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Snyder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Snyder.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-8 with Legends. (PDF 2556 kb)

Supplementary Tables

This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-7 (PDF 1126 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, W., Zhao, H., Mancera, E. et al. Genetic analysis of variation in transcription factor binding in yeast. Nature 464, 1187–1191 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08934

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08934

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing