Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sister chromosome pairing maintains heterozygosity in parthenogenetic lizards

Nature volume 464, pages 283–286 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Although bisexual reproduction has proven to be highly successful, parthenogenetic all-female populations occur frequently in certain taxa, including the whiptail lizards of the genus Aspidoscelis. Allozyme analysis revealed a high degree of fixed heterozygosity in these parthenogenetic species1,2, supporting the view that they originated from hybridization events between related sexual species. It has remained unclear how the meiotic program is altered to produce diploid eggs while maintaining heterozygosity. Here we show that meiosis commences with twice the number of chromosomes in parthenogenetic versus sexual species, a mechanism that provides the basis for generating gametes with unreduced chromosome content without fundamental deviation from the classic meiotic program. Our observation of synaptonemal complexes and chiasmata demonstrate that a typical meiotic program occurs and that heterozygosity is not maintained by bypassing recombination. Instead, fluorescent in situ hybridization probes that distinguish between homologues reveal that bivalents form between sister chromosomes, the genetically identical products of the first of two premeiotic replication cycles. Sister chromosome pairing provides a mechanism for the maintenance of heterozygosity, which is critical for offsetting the reduced fitness associated with the lack of genetic diversity in parthenogenetic species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Oocytes from parthenogenetic A. tesselata contain twice the amount of chromosomal DNA compared to sexual A. gularis.
Figure 2: Visualization of chiasmata and synaptonemal complexes in parthenogenetic A. tesselata and sexual A. tigris.
Figure 3: Meiosis in sexual and parthenogenetic Aspidoscelis species.
Figure 4: Internal telomeric repeats distinguish homologues in A. neomexicana and demonstrate sister chromosome pairing.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neaves, W. B. Adenosine deaminase phenotypes among sexual and parthenogenetic lizards in the genus Cnemidophorus (Teiidae). J. Exp. Zool. 171, 175–183 (1969)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Neaves, W. B. & Gerald, P. S. Lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in parthenogenetic teiid lizards (Cnemidophorus). Science 160, 1004–1005 (1968)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vrijenhoek, R. C., Dawley, R. M., Cole, C. J. & Bogart, J. P. in Evolution and Ecology of Unisexual Vertebrates Vol. 466 (eds Dawley, R. M. & Bogart, J. P.) 19–23 (New York State Museum Bulletin, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reeder, T. W., Cole, C. J. & Dessauer, H. C. Phylogenetic relationships of whiptail lizards of the genus Cnemidophorus (Squamata: Teiidae): a test of monophyly, reevaluation of karyotypic evolution, and review of hybrid origins. Am. Mus. Novit. 3365, 1–61 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowe, C. H. & Wright, J. W. Evolution of parthenogenetic species of Cnemidophorus (whiptail lizards) in western North America. J. Ariz. Acad. Sci. 4, 81–87 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dessauer, H. C. & Cole, C. J. Clonal inheritance in parthenogenetic whiptail lizards: biochemical evidence. J. Hered. 77, 8–12 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cordes, J. E. & Walker, J. M. Skin histocompatibility between syntopic pattern classes C and D of parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus tesselatus in New Mexico. J. Herpetol. 37, 185–188 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cordes, J. E. & Walker, J. M. Evolutionary and systematic implications of skin histocompatibility among parthenogenetic teiid lizards: three color pattern classes of Aspidoscelis dixoni and one of Aspidoscelis tesselata . Copeia 14–26 (2006)

  9. Maslin, T. P. Skin grafting in the bisexual teiid lizard Cnemidophorus sexlineatus and in the unisexual C. tesselatus . J. Exp. Zool. 166, 137–149 (1967)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuellar, O. & Smart, C. Analysis of histoincompatibility in a natural population of the bisexual whiptail lizard Cnemidophorus tigris . Transplantation 24, 127–133 (1977)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuellar, O. Reproduction and the mechanism of meiotic restitution in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus uniparens . J. Morphol. 133, 139–165 (1971)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neaves, W. B. Tetraploidy in a hybrid lizard of the genus Cnemidophorus (Teiidae). Brev. Mus. Comp. Zool. 381, 1–25 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dessauer, H. C. & Cole, C. J. in Evolution and Ecology of Unisexual Vertebrates Vol. 466 (eds Dawley, R. M. & Bogard, J. P.) 49–71 (New York State Museum Bulletin, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parker, E. D. & Selander, R. K. The organization of genetic diversity in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus . Genetics 84, 791–805 (1976)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright, J. W. & Lowe, C. H. Evolution of the alloploid parthenospecies Cnemidophorus tesselatus (Say). Mamm. Chromosome Newsl. 8, 95–96 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edgar, B. A. & Orr-Weaver, T. L. Endoreplication cell cycles: more for less. Cell 105, 297–306 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Macgregor, H. C. & Uzzell, T. M. Gynogenesis in salamanders related to Ambystoma jeffersonianum . Science 143, 1043–1045 (1964)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. White, M. J. D., Cheney, J. & Key, K. H. L. A parthenogenetic species of grasshopper with complex structural heterozygosity (Orthoptera: Acridoidea). Aust. J. Zool. 11, 1–19 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Townsend, C. R. Establishment and maintenance of colonies of parthenogenetic whiptail lizards: Cnemidophorus spp. Int. Zoo. Yb. 19, 80–86 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Denk, W., Strickler, J. H. & Webb, W. W. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Otsu, N. Threshold selection method from gray-level-histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-9, 62–66 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonzalez, R. C. & Woods, R. E. Digital Image Processing 3rd edn, (Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. ImageJ. (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,, 1997–2009)

  24. Moore, M. K., Work, T. M., Balazs, G. H. & Docherty, D. E. Preparation, cryopreservation, and growth of cells prepared from the green turtle (Chelonia mydas). Methods Cell Sci. 19, 161–168 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarthy, J., Bae, N. S., Scrafford, J. & Baumann, P. Human RAP1 inhibits non-homologous end joining at telomeres. EMBO J. 28, 3390–3399 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Reptile Facility for their dedication to animal husbandry; C. Painter and his colleagues at the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish for scientific collection permits; F. Li for electron microscopy; the Stowers Institute Microscopy, Cytometry and Molecular Biology Facilities for support; and S. Hawley, J. Cole, C. Townsend and members of the Baumann and Blanchette laboratories for discussions and comments. We also thank S. Hawley for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was funded by the Stowers Institute for Medical Research, and the Pew Scholars Program in the Biological Sciences sponsored by the Pew Charitable Trusts. P.B. is an Early Career Scientist with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author Contributions A.A.L., W.B.N., D.P.B. and P.B. contributed extensively to the work presented in this paper. W.W. performed, and provided training in, microscopy and image data quantification.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA ,

    Aracely A. Lutes, William B. Neaves, Diana P. Baumann, Winfried Wiegraebe & Peter Baumann

  2. Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA,

    Aracely A. Lutes & Peter Baumann

  3. University of Missouri Kansas City, School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA ,

    William B. Neaves

  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA ,

    Peter Baumann

Authors
  1. Aracely A. Lutes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William B. Neaves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diana P. Baumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Winfried Wiegraebe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter Baumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Baumann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-3 with Legends and Supplementary Table 1. (PDF 1933 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

This movie file shows an animation of the rendered chromosomes shown in Supplementary Figure 1b (see Supplementary Information file). (AVI 4740 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutes, A., Neaves, W., Baumann, D. et al. Sister chromosome pairing maintains heterozygosity in parthenogenetic lizards. Nature 464, 283–286 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08818

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08818

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing