Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Remote triggering of fault-strength changes on the San Andreas fault at Parkfield

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 December 2009

Abstract

Fault strength is a fundamental property of seismogenic zones, and its temporal changes can increase or decrease the likelihood of failure and the ultimate triggering of seismic events. Although changes in fault strength have been suggested to explain various phenomena, such as the remote triggering of seismicity1, there has been no means of actually monitoring this important property in situ. Here we argue that 20 years of observation (1987–2008) of the Parkfield area at the San Andreas fault have revealed a means of monitoring fault strength. We have identified two occasions where long-term changes in fault strength have been most probably induced remotely by large seismic events, namely the 2004 magnitude (M) 9.1 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake and the earlier 1992 M = 7.3 Landers earthquake. In both cases, the change possessed two manifestations: temporal variations in the properties of seismic scatterers—probably reflecting the stress-induced migration of fluids—and systematic temporal variations in the characteristics of repeating-earthquake sequences that are most consistent with changes in fault strength. In the case of the 1992 Landers earthquake, a period of reduced strength probably triggered the 1993 Parkfield aseismic transient2,3,4,5 as well as the accompanying cluster of four M > 4 earthquakes at Parkfield. The fault-strength changes produced by the distant 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake are especially important, as they suggest that the very largest earthquakes may have a global influence on the strength of the Earth’s fault systems. As such a perturbation would bring many fault zones closer to failure, it should lead to temporal clustering of global seismicity. This hypothesis seems to be supported by the unusually high number of M ≥ 8 earthquakes occurring in the few years following the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Map of the Parkfield segment at the San Andreas fault.
Figure 2: Temporal changes in scatterer properties for a 22-year period.
Figure 3: Temporal variations in following the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake.
Figure 4: Temporal changes in seismic moment for the post-Landers earthquake period.

References

  1. 1

    Hill, D. P. & Prejean, S. G. in Treatise on Geophysics (ed. Schubert, G.) Vol. 4 (ed. Kanamori, H.) 257–292 (Elsevier Science, 2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Langbein, J., Gwyther, R. L., Hart, R. H. G. & Gladwin, M. T. Slip-rate increase at Parkfield in 1993 detected by high-precision EDM and borehole tensor strainmeters. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 2529–2532 (1999)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Gao, S., Silver, P. G. & Linde, A. T. Analysis of deformation data at Parkfield, California: detection of a long-term strain transient. J. Geophys. Res. 105 (B2). 2955–2967 (2000)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Niu, F., Silver, P. G., Nadeau, R. M. & McEvilly, T. V. Migration of seismic scatterers associated with the 1993 Parkfield aseismic transient event. Nature 426, 544–548 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Murray, J. R. & Segall, P. Spatiotemporal evolution of a transient slip event on the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, California. J. Geophys. Res. 110 B09407 10.1029/2005JB003651 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Baisch, S. & Bokelmann, G. H. R. Seismic waveform attributes before and after the Loma Prieta earthquake: scattering change near the earthquake and temporal recovery. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (B8). 16323–16338 (2001)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Taira, T., Silver, P. G., Niu, F. & Nadeau, R. M. Detecting seismogenic stress evolution and constraining fault zone rheology in the San Andreas Fault following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 113 B03303 10.1029/2007JB005151 (2008)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Nadeau, R. M. & Johnson, L. R. Seismological studies at Parkfield VI: moment release rates and estimates of source parameters for small repeating earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, 790–814 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Nadeau, R. M. & McEvilly, T. V. Fault slip rates at depth from recurrence intervals of repeating microearthquakes. Science 285, 718–721 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Nadeau, R. M. & McEvilly, T. V. Periodic pulsing of characteristic microearthquakes on the San Andreas Fault. Science 303, 220–222 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Bürgmann, R. et al. Earthquake potential along the Northern Hayward Fault, California. Science 289, 1178–1182 (2000)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Langbein, J., Murray, J. R. & Snyder, H. A. Coseismic and initial postseismic deformation from the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake, observed by Global Positioning System, electronic distance meter, creepmeters, and borehole strainmeters. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, S304–S320 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Li, Y.-G., Chen, P., Cochran, E. S., Vidale, J. E. & Burdette, T. Seismic evidence for rock damage and healing on the San Andreas Fault associated with the 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96, S349–S363 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Peng, Z., Vidale, J. E., Marone, C. & Rubin, A. Systematic variations in recurrence interval and moment of repeating aftershocks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32 L15301 10.1029/2005GL022626 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Schaff, D. P., Beroza, G. C. & Shaw, B. E. Postseismic response of repeating aftershocks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 4549–4552 (1998)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Shimazaki, K. & Nakata, T. Time-predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 7, 279–282 (1980)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Brodsky, E. E. & Prejean, S. G. New constraints on mechanisms of remotely triggered seismicity at Long Valley Caldera. J. Geophys. Res. 110 B04302 10.1029/2004JB003211 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Hill, D. P. et al. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, earthquake. Science 260, 1617–1623 (1993)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    West, M., Sánchez, J. J. & McNutt, S. R. Periodically triggered seismicity at Mount Wrangell, Alaska, after the Sumatra earthquake. Science 308, 1144–1146 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Gao, S. S., Silver, P. G., Linde, A. T. & Sacks, I. S. Annual modulation of triggered seismicity following the 1992 Landers earthquake in California. Nature 406, 500–504 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Elkhoury, J. E., Brodsky, E. E. & Agnew, D. C. Seismic waves increase permeability. Nature 441, 1135–1138 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Snieder, R., Grêt, A., Douma, H. & Scales, J. Coda wave interferometry for estimating nonlinear behavior in seismic velocity. Science 295, 2253–2255 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Okada, Y. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82, 1018–1040 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation EAR-0337308, EAR-0408947, EAR-0409024, EAR-0453638, EAR-0537641, EAR-0544730 and DTM-2025-01, and by the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington. The Parkfield High-Resolution Seismic Network is operated by University of California, Berkeley Seismological Laboratory with financial support from the US Geological Survey (USGS) through National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program award 07HQAG0014. Seismic and geodetic data are archived at the Northern California Earthquake Data Center and USGS, respectively. We thank J. Murray-Moraleda for providing the slip rate data, and E. A. Roeloffs and A. T. Linde for discussions. This is Berkeley Seismological Laboratory contribution 09-14.

Author Contributions T.T., with P.G.S. and F.N, analysed data; R.M.N. identified and maintained the repeating earthquake catalogue; P.G.S. and T.T. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taka’aki Taira.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-8 with Legends and a Supplementary Reference. (PDF 431 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taira, T., Silver, P., Niu, F. et al. Remote triggering of fault-strength changes on the San Andreas fault at Parkfield. Nature 461, 636–639 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08395

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing