Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Non-coalescence of oppositely charged drops

Nature volume 461, pages 377–380 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Electric fields induce motion in many fluid systems, including polymer melts1, surfactant micelles2 and colloidal suspensions3. Likewise, electric fields can be used to move liquid drops4. Electrically induced droplet motion manifests itself in processes as diverse as storm cloud formation5, commercial ink-jet printing6, petroleum and vegetable oil dehydration7, electrospray ionization for use in mass spectrometry8, electrowetting9 and lab-on-a-chip manipulations10. An important issue in practical applications is the tendency for adjacent drops to coalesce, and oppositely charged drops have long been assumed to experience an attractive force that favours their coalescence11,12,13. Here we report the existence of a critical field strength above which oppositely charged drops do not coalesce. We observe that appropriately positioned and oppositely charged drops migrate towards one another in an applied electric field; but whereas the drops coalesce as expected at low field strengths, they are repelled from one another after contact at higher field strengths. Qualitatively, the drops appear to ‘bounce’ off one another. We directly image the transient formation of a meniscus bridge between the bouncing drops, and propose that this temporary bridge is unstable with respect to capillary pressure when it forms in an electric field exceeding a critical strength. The observation of oppositely charged drops bouncing rather than coalescing in strong electric fields should affect our understanding of any process involving charged liquid drops, including de-emulsification, electrospray ionization and atmospheric conduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Electrically driven bouncing of water in oil.
Figure 2: Bouncing within a chain of water droplets in oil.
Figure 3: Meniscus bridge, critical field strength and critical cone angle.
Figure 4: Non-coalescence behaviour in different liquid systems.

References

  1. Schaffer, E., Thurn-Albrecht, T., Russell, T. P. & Steiner, U. Electrically induced structure formation and pattern transfer. Nature 403, 874–877 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Trau, M. et al. Microscopic patterning of orientated mesoscopic silica through guided growth. Nature 390, 674–676 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leunissen, M. E. et al. Ionic colloidal crystals of oppositely charged particles. Nature 437, 235–240 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baygents, J. C. & Saville, D. A. Electrophoresis of drops and bubbles. J. Chem. Soc. Farad. Trans. 87, 1883–1898 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ochs, H. T. & Czys, R. R. Charge effects on the coalescence of water drops in free-fall. Nature 327, 606–608 (1987)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Calvert, P. Inkjet printing for materials and devices. Chem. Mater. 13, 3299–3305 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eow, J. S., Ghadiri, M., Sharif, A. O. & Williams, T. J. Electrostatic enhancement of coalescence of water droplets in oil: a review of the current understanding. Chem. Eng. J. 84, 173–192 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F. & Whitehouse, C. M. Electrospray ionization for mass-spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 246, 64–71 (1989)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baret, J. C. & Mugele, F. Electrical discharge in capillary breakup: controlling the charge of a droplet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 016106 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Link, D. R. et al. Electric control of droplets in microfluidic devices. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 45, 2556–2560 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rayleigh, Lord The influence of electricity on colliding water drops. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 28, 405–409 (1879)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sartor, D. A. Laboratory investigation of collision efficiencies, coalescence and electrical charging of simulated cloud droplets. J. Meteorol. 11, 91–103 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Allan, R. S. & Mason, S. G. Effects of electric fields on coalescence in liquid+liquid systems. Trans. Farad. Soc. 57, 2027–2040 (1961)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pohl, H. A. Dielectrophoresis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jayaratne, O. W. & Mason, B. J. Coalescence + bouncing of water drops at air/water interface. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 280, 545–565 (1964)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor, G. Disintegration of water drops in electric field. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 280, 383–397 (1964)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. de la Mora, J. F. The fluid dynamics of Taylor cones. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 217–243 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mochizuki, T., Mori, Y. H. & Kaji, N. Bouncing motions of liquid-drops between tilted parallel-plate electrodes. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 36, 1039–1045 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hase, M., Watanabe, S. N. & Yoshikawa, K. Rhythmic motion of a droplet under a dc electric field. Phys. Rev. E 74, 046301 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jung, Y. M., Oh, H. C. & Kang, I. S. Electrical charging of a conducting water droplet in a dielectric fluid on the electrode surface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 322, 617–623 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allan, R. S. & Mason, S. G. Particle motions in sheared suspensions 14: coalescence of liquid drops in electric and shear fields. J. Colloid Sci. 17, 383–408 (1962)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bibette, J., Morse, D. C., Witten, T. A. & Weitz, D. A. Stability criteria for emulsions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2439–2442 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Binks, B. P. & Lumsdon, S. O. Pickering emulsions stabilized by monodisperse latex particles: effects of particle size. Langmuir 17, 4540–4547 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brazier-Smith, P. R. Stability and shape of isolated and pairs of water drops in an electric field. Phys. Fluids 14, 1–6 (1971)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brazier-Smith, P. R., Jennings, S. G. & Latham, J. Investigation of behavior of drops and drop-pairs subjected to strong electrical forces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 325, 363–376 (1971)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brazier-Smith, P. R., Latham, J. & Jennings, S. G. Interaction of falling water drops - coalescence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 326, 393–408 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sadek, S. E. & Hendrick, C. D. Electrical coalescence of water droplets in low-conductivity oils. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 13, 139–142 (1974)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Urdahl, O., Williams, T. J., Bailey, A. G. & Thew, M. T. Electrostatic destabilization of water-in-oil emulsions under conditions of turbulent flow. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 74, 158–165 (1996)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chabert, M., Dorfman, K. D. & Viovy, J. L. Droplet fusion by alternating current (AC) field electrocoalescence in microchannels. Electrophoresis 26, 3706–3715 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor, S. E. Theory and practice of electrically-enhanced phase separation of water-in-oil emulsions. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 74, 526–540 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Poitzsch and M. Sullivan at the Schlumberger-Doll Research Center for supplying samples of crude oil, C. Holtze, T. Schneider and D. A. Weitz for feedback and the Harvard Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center for support. A.B. acknowledges support from Harvard University's MRSEC.

Author Contributions W.D.R., J.C.B., A.B. and H.A.S. designed the research; W.D.R., J.C.B., A.B. and F.D. performed research; W.D.R., J.C.B., A.B. and H.A.S analysed data; W.D.R. wrote, and all authors commented on, the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. H. A. Stone

    Present address: Present address: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.,

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science,,

    W. D. Ristenpart

  2. Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California at Davis, 1 Shields Drive, Davis, California 95616, USA,

    W. D. Ristenpart

  3. School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA ,

    J. C. Bird, F. Dollar & H. A. Stone

  4. Department of Mathematics, W. G. Pritchard Laboratories, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA,

    A. Belmonte

Authors
  1. W. D. Ristenpart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. C. Bird
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Belmonte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Dollar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. A. Stone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. D. Ristenpart.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Discussions, Supplementary Data, Supplementary Figures 1-2 with Legends, Supplementary References and Legends for Supplementary Movies 1-6. (PDF 277 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

This movie shows immediate coalescence at a low field strength - see file s1 for full Legend. (MPG 2011 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

This movie shows non-coalescence (bouncing) at a higher field strength - see file s1 for full Legend. (MPG 2964 kb)

Supplementary Movie 3

This movie shows vigorous bouncing at an even higher field strength - see file s1 for full Legend. (MPG 6394 kb)

Supplementary Movie 4

This movie shows two droplets bouncing back and forth in a high field strength - see file s1 for full Legend. (MPG 2240 kb)

Supplementary Movie 5

This movie shows a zoomed-in view of the immediate vicinity at the point of contact for a bouncing drop - see file s1 for full Legend. (MPG 451 kb)

Supplementary Movie 6

This movie shows an example of partial coalescence, where an oppositely charged 'daughter' droplet is emitted from the point of contact - see file s1 for full Legend. (MPG 3315 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ristenpart, W., Bird, J., Belmonte, A. et al. Non-coalescence of oppositely charged drops. Nature 461, 377–380 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08294

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08294

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing