Letter | Published:

The Ink4/Arf locus is a barrier for iPS cell reprogramming

Nature volume 460, pages 11361139 (27 August 2009) | Download Citation

Abstract

The mechanisms involved in the reprogramming of differentiated cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by the three transcription factors Oct4 (also known as Pou5f1), Klf4 and Sox2 remain poorly understood1. The Ink4/Arf locus comprises the Cdkn2aCdkn2b genes encoding three potent tumour suppressors, namely p16Ink4a, p19Arf and p15Ink4b, which are basally expressed in differentiated cells and upregulated by aberrant mitogenic signals2,3,4. Here we show that the locus is completely silenced in iPS cells, as well as in embryonic stem (ES) cells, acquiring the epigenetic marks of a bivalent chromatin domain, and retaining the ability to be reactivated after differentiation. Cell culture conditions during reprogramming enhance the expression of the Ink4/Arf locus, further highlighting the importance of silencing the locus to allow proliferation and reprogramming. Indeed, the three factors together repress the Ink4/Arf locus soon after their expression and concomitant with the appearance of the first molecular markers of ‘stemness’. This downregulation also occurs in cells carrying the oncoprotein large-T, which functionally inactivates the pathways regulated by the Ink4/Arf locus, thus indicating that the silencing of the locus is intrinsic to reprogramming and not the result of a selective process. Genetic inhibition of the Ink4/Arf locus has a profound positive effect on the efficiency of iPS cell generation, increasing both the kinetics of reprogramming and the number of emerging iPS cell colonies. In murine cells, Arf, rather than Ink4a, is the main barrier to reprogramming by activation of p53 (encoded by Trp53) and p21 (encoded by Cdkn1a); whereas, in human fibroblasts, INK4a is more important than ARF. Furthermore, organismal ageing upregulates the Ink4/Arf locus2,5 and, accordingly, reprogramming is less efficient in cells from old organisms, but this defect can be rescued by inhibiting the locus with a short hairpin RNA. All together, we conclude that the silencing of Ink4/Arf locus is rate-limiting for reprogramming, and its transient inhibition may significantly improve the generation of iPS cells.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006)

  2. 2.

    , & Cellular senescence in cancer and aging. Cell 130, 223–233 (2007)

  3. 3.

    , , , & Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593–602 (1997)

  4. 4.

    INK4a/ARF: a multifunctional tumor suppressor locus. Mutat. Res. 576, 22–38 (2005)

  5. 5.

    et al. Ink4a/Arf expression is a biomarker of aging. J. Clin. Invest. 114, 1299–1307 (2004)

  6. 6.

    et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–326 (2006)

  7. 7.

    et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 532–538 (2006)

  8. 8.

    et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553–560 (2007)

  9. 9.

    et al. A stem cell-like chromatin pattern may predispose tumor suppressor genes to DNA hypermethylation and heritable silencing. Nature Genet. 39, 237–242 (2007)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Withdrawal of differentiation inhibitory activity/leukemia inhibitory factor up-regulates D-type cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in mouse embryonic stem cells. Oncogene 12, 309–322 (1996)

  11. 11.

    Ink4a/Arf links senescence and aging. Exp. Gerontol. 39, 1751–1759 (2004)

  12. 12.

    et al. Regulation of p16CDKN2 expression and its implications for cell immortalization and senescence. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 859–867 (1996)

  13. 13.

    Divorcing ARF and p53: an unsettled case. Nature Rev. Cancer 6, 663–673 (2006)

  14. 14.

    et al. Two supporting factors greatly improve the efficiency of human iPSC generation. Cell Stem Cell 3, 475–479 (2008)

  15. 15.

    & CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 13, 1501–1512 (1999)

  16. 16.

    , , , & Retroviral expression in embryonic stem cells and hematopoietic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 7419–7426 (2000)

  17. 17.

    et al. Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2, 151–159 (2008)

  18. 18.

    , , & Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2, 230–240 (2008)

  19. 19.

    , & Role of p14ARF in replicative and induced senescence of human fibroblasts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 6748–6757 (2001)

  20. 20.

    & Cellular senescence: hot or what? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 19, 25–31 (2009)

  21. 21.

    et al. Module map of stem cell genes guides creation of epithelial cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2, 333–344 (2008)

  22. 22.

    et al. An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nature Genet. 40, 499–507 (2008)

  23. 23.

    , , & Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of drug selection. Cell Stem Cell 1, 245–247 (2007)

  24. 24.

    et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007)

  25. 25.

    et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 451, 141–146 (2008)

  26. 26.

    & Induction of senescence by oncogenic Ras. Methods Enzymol. 333, 247–256 (2001)

  27. 27.

    , , & XPF nuclease-dependent telomere loss and increased DNA damage in mice overexpressing TRF2 result in premature aging and cancer. Nature Genet. 37, 1063–1071 (2005)

  28. 28.

    , , , & Deletion of Ku70, Ku80, or both causes early aging without substantially increased cancer. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 8205–8214 (2007)

  29. 29.

    et al. Probing tumor phenotypes using stable and regulated synthetic microRNA precursors. Nature Genet. 37, 1289–1295 (2005)

  30. 30.

    & The tumor-suppressive functions of the human INK4A locus. Cancer Cell 4, 311–319 (2003)

  31. 31.

    , , & Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 85 (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Lowe and R. Agami for reagents. We are grateful to M. Muñoz, O. Dominguez, D. Megias and H. Schonthaler. H.L. is the recipient of a ‘Juan de la Cierva’ contract from the Spanish Ministry of Science (MICINN). M.Co. is the recipient of a ‘Ramon y Cajal’ contract (MICINN). Work in the laboratory of M.S. is funded by the CNIO and by grants from the MICINN (SAF and CONSOLIDER), the Regional Government of Madrid, the European Union, the European Research Council (ERC), and the ‘Marcelino Botin’ Foundation.

Author Contributions H.L. performed most of the experimental work. M.Co. and A.V. made critical experimental contributions. K.S., S.O. and M.Ca. contributed experimentally. H.L., M.Co., M.A.B. and M.S. designed the experimental plan, analysed and interpreted the data. M.S. directed the project and wrote the paper.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Tumor Suppression Group,

    • Han Li
    • , Manuel Collado
    • , Aranzazu Villasante
    •  & Manuel Serrano
  2. Telomeres and Telomerase Group,

    • Katerina Strati
    •  & Maria A. Blasco
  3. Transgenic Mice Unit,

    • Sagrario Ortega
  4. Comparative Pathology Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), 3 Melchor Fernandez Almagro Street, Madrid E-28029, Spain

    • Marta Cañamero

Authors

  1. Search for Han Li in:

  2. Search for Manuel Collado in:

  3. Search for Aranzazu Villasante in:

  4. Search for Katerina Strati in:

  5. Search for Sagrario Ortega in:

  6. Search for Marta Cañamero in:

  7. Search for Maria A. Blasco in:

  8. Search for Manuel Serrano in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Serrano.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figures S1-S15 with Legends.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08290

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing