Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Changes of mind in decision-making

Nature volume 461, pages 263–266 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

A decision is a commitment to a proposition or plan of action based on evidence and the expected costs and benefits associated with the outcome. Progress in a variety of fields has led to a quantitative understanding of the mechanisms that evaluate evidence and reach a decision1,2,3. Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision4,5,6,7,8. Without additional evidence, however, these formalisms fail to explain why a decision-maker would change their mind. Here we extend a model, developed to account for both the timing and the accuracy of the initial decision9, to explain subsequent changes of mind. Subjects made decisions about a noisy visual stimulus, which they indicated by moving a handle. Although they received no additional information after initiating their movement, their hand trajectories betrayed a change of mind in some trials. We propose that noisy evidence is accumulated over time until it reaches a criterion level, or bound, which determines the initial decision, and that the brain exploits information that is in the processing pipeline when the initial decision is made to subsequently either reverse or reaffirm the initial decision. The model explains both the frequency of changes of mind as well as their dependence on both task difficulty and whether the initial decision was accurate or erroneous. The theoretical and experimental findings advance the understanding of decision-making to the highly flexible and cognitive acts of vacillation and self-correction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Experimental set-up.
Figure 2: Accuracy improves through changes of mind.
Figure 3: A bounded-accumulation model of decision-making with post-initiation processing explains changes of mind.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gold, J. I. & Shadlen, M. N. The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 535–574 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugrue, L. P., Corrado, G. S. & Newsome, W. T. Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 363–375 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schall, J. D. Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2, 33–42 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, 1966)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laming, D. R. J. Information Theory of Choice-Reaction Times (Wiley, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ratcliff, R. & Rouder, J. N. Modelling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychol. Sci. 9, 347–356 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Link, S. W. The relative judgment theory of two choice response time. J. Math. Psychol. 12, 114–135 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, P. L. & Vickers, D. The accumulator model of two-choice discrimination. J. Math. Psychol. 32, 135–168 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer, J., Huk, A. C. & Shadlen, M. N. The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. J. Vis. 5, 376–404 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heekeren, H. R., Marrett, S. & Ungerleider, L. G. The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9, 467–479 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beck, J. M. et al. Probabilistic population codes for Bayesian decision making. Neuron 60, 1142–1152 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rabbitt, P. & Vyas, S. Processing a display even after you make a response to it. How perceptual errors can be corrected. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 33, 223–239 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rabbitt, P. M. Error correction time without external error signals. Nature 212, 438 (1966)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, P. L. & Ratcliff, R. Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci. 27, 161–168 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roitman, J. D. & Shadlen, M. N. Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. J. Neurosci. 22, 9475–9489 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiani, R., Hanks, T. D. & Shadlen, M. N. Bounded integration in parietal cortex underlies decisions even when viewing duration is dictated by the environment. J. Neurosci. 28, 3017–3029 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adelson, E. H. & Bergen, J. R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 284–299 (1985)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Romo, R., Hernandez, A., Zainos, A., Lemus, L. & Brody, C. D. Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex. Nature Neurosci. 5, 1217–1225 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Todorov, E. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neurosci. 7, 907–915 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parker, A. J. & Newsome, W. T. Sense and the single neuron: probing the physiology of perception. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 227–277 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Uchida, N., Kepecs, A. & Mainen, Z. F. Seeing at a glance, smelling in a whiff: rapid forms of perceptual decision making. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 485–491 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Daw, N. D., O’Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Seymour, B. & Dolan, R. J. Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature 441, 876–879 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Deaner, R. O., Khera, A. V. & Platt, M. L. Monkeys pay per view: adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques. Curr. Biol. 15, 543–548 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, T. & Shadlen, M. N. Probabilistic reasoning by neurons. Nature 447, 1075–1080 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Usher, M. & McClelland, J. L. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol. Rev. 108, 550–592 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong, K. F. & Wang, X. J. A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in perceptual decisions. J. Neurosci. 26, 1314–1328 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gold, J. I. & Shadlen, M. N. Banburismus and the brain: decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron 36, 299–308 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P. & Cohen, J. D. The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol. Rev. 113, 700–765 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stuphorn, V., Taylor, T. L. & Schall, J. D. Performance monitoring by the supplementary eye field. Nature 408, 857–860 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghez, C., Hening, W. & Favilla, M. Gradual specification of response amplitude in human tracking performance. Brain Behav. Evol. 33, 69–74 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Howard, I. S., Ingram, J. N. & Wolpert, D. M. A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control. J. Neurosci. Methods 181, 199–211 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shadlen, M., Hanks, T., Churchland, A., Kiani, R. & Yang, T. in Bayesian Brain: Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding (ed. Doya, K. et al.) 209–237 (MIT Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kass, R. E. & Wasserman, L. A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwarz criterion. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 928–934 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Risken, H. The Fokker–Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications 2nd edn (Springer, 1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Efron, B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1982)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, Y. H. Fiducial intervals: what are they? Am. Stat. 54, 105–111 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust, the European grant SENSOPAC IST-2005-028056, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and US National Eye Institute grant EY11378. We thank A. Faisal, H. Vincent, I. Howard and J. Ingram for their assistance. M.N.S. thanks Trinity College, Cambridge, for support.

Author Contributions D.M.W. and M.N.S. planned the experiments. A.R. performed the experiments. All authors analysed and interpreted results, and all authors wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering, Computational and Biological Learning Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK,

    Arbora Resulaj & Daniel M. Wolpert

  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Farm Research Campus, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA ,

    Arbora Resulaj

  3. National Primate Research Center and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA,

    Roozbeh Kiani & Michael N. Shadlen

Authors
  1. Arbora Resulaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roozbeh Kiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel M. Wolpert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael N. Shadlen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael N. Shadlen.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-4 with Legends, Supplementary Tables 1-4 and Supplementary References. (PDF 1388 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. et al. Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature 461, 263–266 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08275

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08275

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing