Article | Published:

Adaptive prediction of environmental changes by microorganisms

Nature volume 460, pages 220224 (09 July 2009) | Download Citation


Natural habitats of some microorganisms may fluctuate erratically, whereas others, which are more predictable, offer the opportunity to prepare in advance for the next environmental change. In analogy to classical Pavlovian conditioning, microorganisms may have evolved to anticipate environmental stimuli by adapting to their temporal order of appearance. Here we present evidence for environmental change anticipation in two model microorganisms, Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that anticipation is an adaptive trait, because pre-exposure to the stimulus that typically appears early in the ecology improves the organism’s fitness when encountered with a second stimulus. Additionally, we observe loss of the conditioned response in E. coli strains that were repeatedly exposed in a laboratory evolution experiment only to the first stimulus. Focusing on the molecular level reveals that the natural temporal order of stimuli is embedded in the wiring of the regulatory network—early stimuli pre-induce genes that would be needed for later ones, yet later stimuli only induce genes needed to cope with them. Our work indicates that environmental anticipation is an adaptive trait that was repeatedly selected for during evolution and thus may be ubiquitous in biology.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 323–337 (2001)

  2. 2.

    et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4241–4257 (2000)

  3. 3.

    et al. A microarray-based antibiotic screen identifies a regulatory role for supercoiling in the osmotic stress response of Escherichia coli. Genome Res. 13, 206–215 (2003)

  4. 4.

    , , & A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression. Nature Genet. 38, 830–834 (2006)

  5. 5.

    & Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 309, 2075–2078 (2005)

  6. 6.

    , & Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nature Genet. 40, 471–475 (2008)

  7. 7.

    et al. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305, 1622–1625 (2004)

  8. 8.

    Conditioned Reflexes (Oxford Univ. Press, 1927)

  9. 9.

    , & Predictive behavior within microbial genetic networks. Science 320, 1313–1317 (2008)

  10. 10.

    Escherichia coli habitats, cell-types, and molecular mechanisms of gene control. Am. Nat. 122, 732–744 (1983)

  11. 11.

    Demand theory of gene regulation. II. Quantitative application to the lactose and maltose operons of Escherichia coli. Genetics 149, 1677–1691 (1998)

  12. 12.

    et al. A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli. Nature Methods 3, 623–628 (2006)

  13. 13.

    et al. Physiological studies of Escherichia coli strain MG1655: Growth defects and apparent cross-regulation of gene expression. J. Bacteriol. 185, 5611–5626 (2003)

  14. 14.

    , & Defined order of evolutionary adaptations: experimental evidence. Evolution 62, 1547–1554 (2008)

  15. 15.

    Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. Genome Res. 10, 403–409 (2000)

  16. 16.

    & Kinetics of alcoholic fermentation under anisothermal enological conditions. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 44, 127–133 (1993)

  17. 17.

    & in The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Gene Expression (eds Jones, E. W., Pringle, J. R. & Broach, J. R.) 193–282 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1992)

  18. 18.

    & Yeast stress response and fermentation efficiency: How to survive the making of wine - a review. SAJEV 21, 27–51 (2000)

  19. 19.

    Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16, 675–729 (2000)

  20. 20.

    et al. Diauxic shift-induced stress resistance against hydroperoxides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is not an adaptive stress response and does not depend on functional mitochondria. Curr. Genet. 39, 137–149 (2001)

  21. 21.

    , , & Hsp104 is required for tolerance to many forms of stress. EMBO J. 11, 2357–2364 (1992)

  22. 22.

    & Stress-activated genomic expression changes serve a preparative role for impending stress in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 4580–4587 (2008)

  23. 23.

    et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (Database issue). D258–D261 (2004)

  24. 24.

    , & Mitochondrial function is required for resistance to oxidative stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 410, 219–222 (1997)

  25. 25.

    , & A yeast catabolic enzyme controls transcriptional memory. Curr. Biol. 17, 2041–2046 (2007)

  26. 26.

    & Transient responses and adaptation to steady state in a eukaryotic gene regulation system. Phys. Biol. 1, 67–76 (2004)

  27. 27.

    et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901–906 (1999)

  28. 28.

    et al. Diverse two-dimensional input functions control bacterial sugar genes. Mol. Cell 29, 786–792 (2008)

  29. 29.

    & Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature 436, 588–592 (2005)

Download references


We thank S. Trattner–Frenkel and Z. Bloom for their help and support in the yeast microarray experiments. We thank members of the Pilpel laboratory for many discussions. We thank E. Schneidman, E. Ben-Jacob, M. Springer, A. Tanay, U. Alon and D. Cavalieri for discussions and advice. We thank U. Alon for providing the promoter–GFP fused plasmids. We thank the Tauber Foundation, the Minerva Foundation, the Israel Science Foundation ‘Bikura program’, the European Research Council ‘Ideas Program’ and the Ben May Foundation for grant support. M.K. was supported from grants from the Israel Science Foundation and the Israeli Ministry of Science and Technology.

Author Contributions A.M. raised the original idea and performed all the experiments; G.R., B.G. and A.Y. participated in experiments; E.D. evolved the E. coli strain; A.M., O.D. and Y.P. designed the experiments; A.M., M.K., O.D. and Y.P. analysed the data; O.D. and Y.P. supervised the project; A.M., O.D. and Y.P. interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Orna Dahan
    •  & Yitzhak Pilpel

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot 76100, Israel

    • Amir Mitchell
    • , Bella Groisman
    • , Avihu Yona
    • , Orna Dahan
    •  & Yitzhak Pilpel
  2. Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

    • Gal H. Romano
    •  & Martin Kupiec
  3. Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot 76100, Israel

    • Erez Dekel
  4. Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

    • Yitzhak Pilpel


  1. Search for Amir Mitchell in:

  2. Search for Gal H. Romano in:

  3. Search for Bella Groisman in:

  4. Search for Avihu Yona in:

  5. Search for Erez Dekel in:

  6. Search for Martin Kupiec in:

  7. Search for Orna Dahan in:

  8. Search for Yitzhak Pilpel in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yitzhak Pilpel.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1-5, Supplementary Equation1, Supplementary Figures 1-8 with Legends, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References.

About this article

Publication history





Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.