Letter

Evolutionary diversification in stickleback affects ecosystem functioning

Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Explaining the ecological causes of evolutionary diversification is a major focus of biology, but surprisingly little has been said about the effects of evolutionary diversification on ecosystems1,2,3. The number of species in an ecosystem and their traits are key predictors of many ecosystem-level processes, such as rates of productivity, biomass sequestration and decomposition4,5. Here we demonstrate short-term ecosystem-level effects of adaptive radiation in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) over the past 10,000 years. These fish have undergone recent parallel diversification in several lakes in coastal British Columbia, resulting in the formation of two specialized species (benthic and limnetic) from a generalist ancestor6. Using a mesocosm experiment, we demonstrate that this diversification has strong effects on ecosystems, affecting prey community structure, total primary production, and the nature of dissolved organic materials that regulate the spectral properties of light transmission in the system. However, these ecosystem effects do not simply increase in their relative strength with increasing specialization and species richness; instead, they reflect the complex and indirect consequences of ecosystem engineering by sticklebacks. It is well known that ecological factors influence adaptive radiation7,8. We demonstrate that adaptive radiation, even over short timescales, can have profound effects on ecosystems.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:

    $199

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 329–332 (1998)

  2. 2.

    , & Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 21, 465–477 (2007)

  3. 3.

    , , , & Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system. Nature 424, 303–306 (2003)

  4. 4.

    Predators have large effects on ecosystem properties by changing plant diversity not plant biomass. Ecology 87, 1432–1437 (2006)

  5. 5.

    et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294, 804–808 (2001)

  6. 6.

    Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): origin of the species pairs. Can. J. Zool. 71, 515–523 (1993)

  7. 7.

    The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000)

  8. 8.

    et al. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455, 620–626 (2008)

  9. 9.

    Portrait of an Adaptive Radiation: Ecology and Evolution of Anolis Lizards (Univ. California Press, 2009)

  10. 10.

    & How and Why Species Multiply: The Radiation of Darwin’s Finches (Princeton Univ. Press, 2008)

  11. 11.

    The evolution of predator–prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 79–105 (2000)

  12. 12.

    & Experimental evidence that phenotypic divergence in predators drives community divergence in prey. Ecology 90, 300–305 (2009)

  13. 13.

    , , & Predator biodiversity strengthens herbivore suppression. Ecol. Lett. 9, 789–796 (2006)

  14. 14.

    & Rapid evolution buffers ecosystem impacts of viruses in a microbial food web. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1178–1188 (2008)

  15. 15.

    Macroevolution of ecosystem engineering, niche construction and diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 304–310 (2008)

  16. 16.

    et al. Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of ectodysplasin alleles. Science 307, 1928–1933 (2005)

  17. 17.

    , , & Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287, 306–308 (2000)

  18. 18.

    Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411, 944–947 (2001)

  19. 19.

    , & The effect of temporal scale on the outcome of trophic cascade experiments. Oecologia 134, 578–586 (2003)

  20. 20.

    Effects of predator hunting mode on grassland ecosystem function. Science 319, 952–954 (2008)

  21. 21.

    & Non-trophic interactions, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: an interaction web model. Am. Nat. 171, 91–106 (2008)

  22. 22.

    et al. Copepods act as a switch between alternative trophic cascades in marine pelagic food webs. Ecol. Lett. 7, 321–328 (2004)

  23. 23.

    , & Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78, 1946–1957 (1997)

  24. 24.

    , , & Effects of fish and plankton on lake temperature and mixing depth. Science 247, 312–315 (1990)

  25. 25.

    , , & Dissolved organic carbon and nutrients as regulators of lake ecosystems: Resurrection of a more integrated paradigm. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44, 795–803 (1999)

  26. 26.

    , , & Comparison of the optical properties of dissolved organic matter in two river-influenced coastal regions of the Canadian arctic. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 72, 261–272 (2007)

  27. 27.

    , & The temporal-spatial pattern of vertical migration by the freshwater copepod Skistodiaptomus oregonensis relative to predation risk. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 1350–1363 (1998)

  28. 28.

    & Competition between biological and photochemical processes in the mineralization of dissolved organic carbon. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49, 117–124 (2004)

  29. 29.

    et al. Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 38–48 (2001)

  30. 30.

    & Effect of climate change relative to ozone depletion on UV exposure in subarctic lakes. Nature 404, 484–487 (2000)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Albert, T. Vines, D. Yim, P. Tamkee, J. Courchesne, R. Barrett, K. Marchinko, M. Arnegard, J. Sashaw, J. Gosling, S. Hausch, J. Rosenfeld and S. Rogers for assistance in the laboratory and the field. We thank E. B. Rosenblum and members of the Harmon laboratory for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Luke J. Harmon
    •  & Blake Matthews

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-3051, USA

    • Luke J. Harmon
    •  & Simone Des Roches
  2. Biodiversity Research Centre and Zoology Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada

    • Luke J. Harmon
    • , Blake Matthews
    • , Jonathan B. Shurin
    •  & Dolph Schluter
  3. EAWAG, Aquatic Ecology, Seestrasse 79, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland

    • Blake Matthews
  4. Department of Biology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA

    • Jonathan M. Chase

Authors

  1. Search for Luke J. Harmon in:

  2. Search for Blake Matthews in:

  3. Search for Simone Des Roches in:

  4. Search for Jonathan M. Chase in:

  5. Search for Jonathan B. Shurin in:

  6. Search for Dolph Schluter in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke J. Harmon.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Notes and Data, Supplementary Figure S1 with Legend and Supplementary References

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.