Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle


The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is tightly regulated during the cell cycle. In G1 phase, the absence of a sister chromatid means that repair of DSBs occurs through non-homologous end-joining or microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ)1. These pathways often involve loss of DNA sequences at the break site and are therefore error-prone. In late S and G2 phases, even though DNA end-joining pathways remain functional2, there is an increase in repair of DSBs by homologous recombination, which is mostly error-free3,4. Consequently, the relative contribution of these different pathways to DSB repair in the cell cycle has a large influence on the maintenance of genetic integrity. It has remained unknown how DSBs are directed for repair by different, potentially competing, repair pathways. Here we identify a role for CtIP (also known as RBBP8) in this process in the avian B-cell line DT40. We establish that CtIP is required not only for repair of DSBs by homologous recombination in S/G2 phase but also for MMEJ in G1. The function of CtIP in homologous recombination, but not MMEJ, is dependent on the phosphorylation of serine residue 327 and recruitment of BRCA1. Cells expressing CtIP protein that cannot be phosphorylated at serine 327 are specifically defective in homologous recombination and have a decreased level of single-stranded DNA after DNA damage, whereas MMEJ remains unaffected. Our data support a model in which phosphorylation of serine 327 of CtIP as cells enter S phase and the recruitment of BRCA1 functions as a molecular switch to shift the balance of DSB repair from error-prone DNA end-joining to error-free homologous recombination.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Sensitivity of CtIP -/-/- mutant cells to DNA-damaging agents.
Figure 2: CtIP -/-/- mutant cells are sensitive to X-rays in both G1 and S/G2 phases of the cell cycle.
Figure 3: CtIP -/-/- mutant cells are defective for homologous recombination and MMEJ.
Figure 4: Phosphorylation of serine 327 is required for generation of ssDNA in DT40 cells.


  1. Ma, J. L., Kim, E. M., Haber, J. E. & Lee, S. E. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 8820–8828 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, J. S. et al. Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 170, 341–347 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Takata, M. et al. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 17, 5497–5508 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pâques, F. & Haber, J. E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 349–404 (1999)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sartori, A. A. et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450, 509–514 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumann, P. & West, S. C. Role of the human RAD51 protein in homologous recombination and double-stranded-break repair. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 247–251 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, P. L. et al. Inactivation of CtIP leads to early embryonic lethality mediated by G1 restraint and to tumorigenesis by haploid insufficiency. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3535–3542 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sonoda, E., Morrison, C., Yamashita, Y. M., Takata, M. & Takeda, S. Reverse genetic studies of homologous DNA recombination using the chicken B-lymphocyte line, DT40. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356, 111–117 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tauchi, H., Matsuura, S., Kobayashi, J., Sakamoto, S. & Komatsu, K. Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene, NBS1, and molecular links to factors for genome stability. Oncogene 21, 8967–8980 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simpson, L. J. & Sale, J. E. Rev1 is essential for DNA damage tolerance and non-templated immunoglobulin gene mutation in a vertebrate cell line. EMBO J. 22, 1654–1664 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bridge, W. L., Vandenberg, C. J., Franklin, R. J. & Hiom, K. The BRIP1 helicase functions independently of BRCA1 in the Fanconi anemia pathway for DNA crosslink repair. Nature Genet. 37, 953–957 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu, X. & Chen, J. DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoint control requires CtIP, a phosphorylation-dependent binding partner of BRCA1 C-terminal domains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 9478–9486 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pierce, A. J., Johnson, R. D., Thompson, L. H. & Jasin, M. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 13, 2633–2638 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stark, J. M., Pierce, A. J., Oh, J., Pastink, A. & Jasin, M. Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 9305–9316 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bennardo, N., Cheng, A., Huang, N. & Stark, J. M. Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000110 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, X., Wu, L. C., Bowcock, A. M., Aronheim, A. & Baer, R. The C-terminal (BRCT) domains of BRCA1 interact in vivo with CtIP, a protein implicated in the CtBP pathway of transcriptional repression. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25388–25392 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greenberg, R. A. et al. Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes. Genes Dev. 20, 34–46 (2006)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlegel, B. P., Jodelka, F. M. & Nunez, R. BRCA1 promotes induction of ssDNA by ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 66, 5181–5189 (2006)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Endicott, J. A., Noble, M. E. & Tucker, J. A. Cyclin-dependent kinases: inhibition and substrate recognition. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 738–744 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ira, G. et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431, 1011–1017 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huertas, P., Cortes-Ledesma, F., Sartori, A. A., Aguilera, A. & Jackson, S. P. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455, 689–692 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank M. Jasin for gifts of DR–GFP and pHPRT-SSA-GFP, S. Takeda for the gift of KU70 DT40, and J. Di Noia for DT40 DTDR-17. We would also like to thank our colleagues C. Rada and J. Sale for comments and suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript. M.H.Y. is a Milstein Student of the Darwin Trust, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Author Contributions All experiments were performed by M.H.Y. and were conceived by M.H.Y. and K.H. K.H. and M.H.Y. wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Hiom.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

This file contains Supplementary Figures S1-S11 with Legends (PDF 6933 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yun, M., Hiom, K. CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature 459, 460–463 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing