An anomalous positron abundance in cosmic rays with energies 1.5–100 GeV

Article metrics

Abstract

Antiparticles account for a small fraction of cosmic rays and are known to be produced in interactions between cosmic-ray nuclei and atoms in the interstellar medium1, which is referred to as a ‘secondary source’. Positrons might also originate in objects such as pulsars2 and microquasars3 or through dark matter annihilation4, which would be ‘primary sources’. Previous statistically limited measurements5,6,7 of the ratio of positron and electron fluxes have been interpreted as evidence for a primary source for the positrons, as has an increase in the total electron+positron flux at energies between 300 and 600 GeV (ref. 8). Here we report a measurement of the positron fraction in the energy range 1.5–100 GeV. We find that the positron fraction increases sharply over much of that range, in a way that appears to be completely inconsistent with secondary sources. We therefore conclude that a primary source, be it an astrophysical object or dark matter annihilation, is necessary.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Calorimeter energy fraction, .
Figure 2: PAMELA positron fraction with other experimental data and with secondary production model.

References

  1. 1

    Moskalenko, I. V. & Strong, A. W. Production and propagation of cosmic-ray positrons and electrons. Astrophys. J. 493, 694–707 (1998)

  2. 2

    Atoian, A. M., Aharonian, F. A. & Volk, H. J. Electrons and positrons in the galactic cosmic rays. Phys. Rev. D 52, 3265–3275 (1995)

  3. 3

    Heinz, S. & Sunyaev, R. Cosmic rays from microquasars: A narrow component in the CR spectrum. Astron. Astrophys. 390, 751–766 (2002)

  4. 4

    Jungman, G., Kamionkowski, M. & Griest, K. Supersymmetric dark matter. Phys. Rep. 267, 195–373 (1996)

  5. 5

    Golden, R. L. et al. Measurement of the positron to electron ratio in the cosmic rays above 5 GeV. Astrophys. J. 457, L103–L106 (1996)

  6. 6

    Barwick, S. W. et al. Measurements of the cosmic-ray positron fraction from 1 to 50 GeV. Astrophys. J. 482, L191–L194 (1997)

  7. 7

    Aguilar, M. et al. Cosmic-ray positron fraction measurement from 1 to 30 GeV with AMS-01. Phys. Lett. B 646, 145–154 (2007)

  8. 8

    Chang, J. et al. An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300–800 GeV. Nature 456, 362–365 (2008)

  9. 9

    Picozza, P. et al. PAMELA — A payload for antimatter matter exploration and light-nuclei astrophysics. Astropart. Phys. 27, 296–315 (2007)

  10. 10

    Delahaye, T. et al. Galactic secondary positron flux at the Earth. Preprint at 〈http://arXiv.org/abs/0809.5268v3〉 (2008)

  11. 11

    Boezio, M. et al. The cosmic-ray electron and positron spectra measured at 1 AU during solar minimum activity. Astrophys. J. 532, 653–669 (2000)

  12. 12

    Alcaraz, J. et al. Leptons in near earth orbit. Phys. Lett. B 484, 10–22 (2000)

  13. 13

    Clem, J. & Evenson, P. in Proc. 30th Intl Cosmic Ray Conf. Vol. 1 (eds Caballero, R. et al.) 477–480 (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2008)

  14. 14

    Aharonian, F. et al. First detection of a VHE gamma-ray spectral maximum from a cosmic source: HESS discovery of the Vela X nebula. Astron. Astrophys. 448, L43–L47 (2006)

  15. 15

    Berezhko, E. G., Ksenofontov, L. T. & Völk, H. J. Emission of SN 1006 produced by accelerated cosmic rays. Astron. Astrophys. 395, 943–953 (2002)

  16. 16

    Serpico, P. On the possible causes of a rise with energy of the cosmic ray positron fraction. Phys. Rev. D 79, 021302 (2009)

  17. 17

    Komatsu, E. et al. Five-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe observations: Cosmological interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 180, 330–376 (2009)

  18. 18

    Servant, G. & Tait, T. M. P. Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate? Nucl. Phys. B 650, 391–419 (2003)

  19. 19

    Cheng, H. C., Feng, J. L. & Matchev, K. T. Kaluza-Klein dark matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 211301 (2002)

  20. 20

    Bertone, G., Hooper, D. & Silk, J. Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints. Phys. Rep. 405, 279–390 (2005)

  21. 21

    Adriani, O. et al. A new measurement of the antiproton-to-proton flux ratio up to 100 GeV in the cosmic radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 051101 (2009)

  22. 22

    Cholis, I., Dobler, G., Finkbeiner, D. P., Goodenough, L. & Weiner, N. The case for a 700+ GeV WIMP: Cosmic ray spectra from ATIC and PAMELA. Preprint at 〈http://arXiv.org/abs/0811.3641v1〉 (2008)

  23. 23

    Bergström, L., Bringmann, T. & Edsjö, J. New positron spectral features from supersymmetric dark matter: A way to explain the PAMELA data? Phys. Rev. D 78, 103520 (2008)

  24. 24

    Donato, F., Maurin, D., Brun, P., Delahaye, T. & Salati, P. Constraints on WIMP dark matter from the high energy PAMELA data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 071301 (2009)

  25. 25

    Grajek, P., Kane, G., Phalen, D. J., Pierce, A. & Watson, A. Is the PAMELA positron excess winos? Preprint at 〈http://arXiv.org/abs/0812.4555v1〉 (2008)

  26. 26

    Grimani, C. Pulsar birthrate set by cosmic-ray positron observations. Astron. Astrophys. 418, 649–653 (2004)

  27. 27

    Büsching, I., de Jager, O. C., Potgieter, M. S. & Venter, C. A cosmic-ray positron anisotropy due to two middle-aged, nearby pulsars? Astrophys. J. 78, L39–L42 (2008)

  28. 28

    Yuksel, H., Kistler, M. D. & Stanev, T. TeV gamma rays from Geminga and the origin of the GeV positron excess. Preprint at 〈http://arXiv.org/abs/0810.2784v2〉 (2008)

  29. 29

    Hooper, D., Blasi, P. & Serpico, P. D. Pulsars as the sources of high energy cosmic ray positrons. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01, 025 (2009)

  30. 30

    Beatty, J. J. et al. New measurement of the cosmic-ray positron fraction from 5 to 15GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 241102 (2004)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Marinucci for discussions concerning statistical methods, D. Müller, S. Swordy and their group at University of Chicago, G. Bellettini and G. Chiarelli for discussions about the data analysis and L. Bergström for comments on the interpretation of our results. We acknowledge support from The Italian Space Agency (ASI), Deutsches Zentrum für Luftund Raumfahrt (DLR), The Swedish National Space Board, The Swedish Research Council, The Russian Space Agency (Roscosmos) and The Russian Foundation for Basic Research.

Author information

Correspondence to P. Picozza.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures s1-s7 with Legends, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Data and Supplementary References (PDF 324 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.