Emergence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quantum wells


According to Noether’s theorem1, for every symmetry in nature there is a corresponding conservation law. For example, invariance with respect to spatial translation corresponds to conservation of momentum. In another well-known example, invariance with respect to rotation of the electron’s spin, or SU(2) symmetry, leads to conservation of spin polarization. For electrons in a solid, this symmetry is ordinarily broken by spin–orbit coupling, allowing spin angular momentum to flow to orbital angular momentum. However, it has recently been predicted that SU(2) can be achieved in a two-dimensional electron gas, despite the presence of spin–orbit coupling2. The corresponding conserved quantities include the amplitude and phase of a helical spin density wave termed the ‘persistent spin helix’2. SU(2) is realized, in principle, when the strengths of two dominant spin–orbit interactions, the Rashba3 (strength parameterized by α) and linear Dresselhaus4 (β1) interactions, are equal. This symmetry is predicted to be robust against all forms of spin-independent scattering, including electron–electron interactions, but is broken by the cubic Dresselhaus term (β3) and spin-dependent scattering. When these terms are negligible, the distance over which spin information can propagate is predicted to diverge as α approaches β1. Here we report experimental observation of the emergence of the persistent spin helix in GaAs quantum wells by independently tuning α and β1. Using transient spin-grating spectroscopy5, we find a spin-lifetime enhancement of two orders of magnitude near the symmetry point. Excellent quantitative agreement with theory across a wide range of sample parameters allows us to obtain an absolute measure of all relevant spin–orbit terms, identifying β3 as the main SU(2)-violating term in our samples. The tunable suppression of spin relaxation demonstrated in this work is well suited for application to spintronics6,7.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Double-exponential decay of transient spin gratings.
Figure 2: Rashba and linear Dresselhaus tuning.
Figure 3: Temperature dependence of the PSH.


  1. 1

    Noether, E. Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachr. König. Gesellsch. Wiss. Göttingen, Math-Phys. Klasse 235–257 (1918)

  2. 2

    Bernevig, B. A., Orenstein, J. & Zhang, S.-C. Exact SU(2) symmetry and persistent spin helix in a spin-orbit coupled system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 236601 (2006)

  3. 3

    Bychkov, Y. A. & Rashba, E. I. Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers. J. Phys. Chem. 17, 6039–6045 (1984)

  4. 4

    Dresselhaus, G. Spin–orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures. Phys. Rev. 100, 580–586 (1955)

  5. 5

    Cameron, A. R., Riblet, P. & Miller, A. Spin gratings and the measurement of electron drift mobility in multiple quantum well semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4793–4796 (1996)

  6. 6

    Awschalom, D. D., Loss, D. & Samarth, N. (eds) Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation (Springer, 2002)

  7. 7

    Ohno, M. & Yoh, K. Datta-Das-type spin-field-effect transistor in the nonballistic regime. Phys. Rev. B 77, 045323 (2008)

  8. 8

    Meier, F. & Zakharchenya, B. Optical Orientation (North-Holland, 1984)

  9. 9

    Gedik, N. & Orenstein, J. Absolute phase measurement in heterodyne detection of transient gratings. Opt. Lett. 29, 2109–2111 (2004)

  10. 10

    Crooker, S. A., Awschalom, D. D. & Samarth, N. Time-resolved Faraday rotation spectroscopy of spin dynamics in digital magnetic heterostructures. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 1, 1082–1092 (1995)

  11. 11

    Froltsov, V. A. Diffusion of inhomogeneous spin distribution in a magnetic field parallel to interfaces of a III–V semiconductor quantum well. Phys. Rev. B 64, 045311 (2001)

  12. 12

    Burkov, A. A., Nunez, A. S. & MacDonald, A. H. Theory of spin-charge-coupled transport in a two-dimensional electron gas with Rashba spin-orbit interactions. Phys. Rev. B 70, 155308 (2004)

  13. 13

    Weber, C. P. et al. Nondiffusive spin dynamics in a two-dimensional electron gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 076604 (2007)

  14. 14

    Schliemann, J., Egues, J. C. & Loss, D. Nonballistic spin-field-effect transistor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 146801 (2003)

  15. 15

    Stanescu, T. D. & Galitski, V. Spin relaxation in a generic two-dimensional spin-orbit coupled system. Phys. Rev. B 75, 125307 (2007)

  16. 16

    Braun, W. Trampert, A. Däweritz, L. & Ploog, K. H. Nonuniform segregation of Ga at AlAs/GaAs heterointerfaces. Phys. Rev. B 55, 1689–1695 (1997)

  17. 17

    de Andrada e Silva, E. A. La Rocca, G. C. & Bassani, F. Spin-orbit splitting of electronic states in semiconductor asymmetric quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 55, 16293–16299 (1997)

  18. 18

    Schubert, E. F. et al. Fermi-level-pinning-induced impurity redistribution in semiconductors during epitaxial growth. Phys. Rev. B 42, 1364–1368 (1990)

  19. 19

    Winkler, R. Spin–Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems (Springer Tracts Mod. Phys. Vol. 191, Springer, 2003)

  20. 20

    Krich, J. J. & Halperin, B. I. Cubic Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling in 2D electron quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 226802 (2007)

  21. 21

    Chantis, A. N., Schilfgaarde, M. & Kotani, T. Ab initio prediction of conduction band spin splitting in zinc blende semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 086405 (2006)

  22. 22

    Fabian, J., Matos-Abiague, A., Ertler, C., Stano, P. & Zutic, I. Semiconductor spintronics. Acta Physica Slovaca 57, 565–907 (2007)

  23. 23

    D’Amico, I. & Vignale, G. Spin Coulomb drag in the two-dimensional electron liquid. Phys. Rev. B 68, 045307 (2003)

  24. 24

    Weber, C. P. et al. Observation of spin Coulomb drag in a two-dimensional electron gas. Nature 437, 1330–1333 (2005)

  25. 25

    Weng, M. Q., Wu, M. W. & Cui, H. L. Spin relaxation in n-type GaAs quantum wells with transient spin grating. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 063714 (2008)

  26. 26

    Sherman, E. & Ya Random spin–orbit coupling and spin relaxation in symmetric quantum wells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 209–211 (2003)

  27. 27

    D’Yakonov, M. I. & Perel’, V. I. Spin relaxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmetric semiconductors. Sov. Phys. Solid State 13, 3023–3026 (1971)

Download references


Work performed at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Stanford University was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Science, Materials Science and Engineering Division, and at the University of California, Santa Barbara by the US National Science Foundation and Office of Naval Research. S.M. acknowledges partial support through the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship Program. We thank J. Stephens and J. Krich for discussions, G. Fleming for use of a phase-mask array, and K. Bruns for creating the PSH diagram of Fig. 1c.

Author information

Correspondence to J. D. Koralek.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Notes to Supplementary Figures S1-S7 with Legends and Supplementary Tables S3 and S4. (PDF 535 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koralek, J., Weber, C., Orenstein, J. et al. Emergence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quantum wells. Nature 458, 610–613 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07871

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.