Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile


Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of infectious diarrhoea in hospitals worldwide, because of its virulence, spore-forming ability and persistence1,2. C. difficile-associated diseases are induced by antibiotic treatment or disruption of the normal gastrointestinal flora3,4. Recently, morbidity and mortality resulting from C. difficile-associated diseases have increased significantly due to changes in the virulence of the causative strains and antibiotic usage patterns1,2,5,6. Since 2002, epidemic toxinotype III NAP1/027 strains1,2, which produce high levels of the major virulence factors, toxin A and toxin B, have emerged. These toxins have 63% amino acid sequence similarity7 and are members of the large clostridial glucosylating toxin family, which are monoglucosyltransferases that are pro-inflammatory, cytotoxic and enterotoxic in the human colon8,9,10. Inside host cells, both toxins catalyse the transfer of glucose onto the Rho family of GTPases, leading to cell death8,11. However, the role of these toxins in the context of a C. difficile infection is unknown. Here we describe the construction of isogenic tcdA and tcdB (encoding toxin A and B, respectively) mutants of a virulent C. difficile strain and their use in the hamster disease model to show that toxin B is a key virulence determinant. Previous studies showed that purified toxin A alone can induce most of the pathology observed after infection of hamsters with C. difficile8,9,12 and that toxin B is not toxic in animals unless it is co-administered with toxin A, suggesting that the toxins act synergistically12. Our work provides evidence that toxin B, not toxin A, is essential for virulence. Furthermore, it is clear that the importance of these toxins in the context of infection cannot be predicted exclusively from studies using purified toxins, reinforcing the importance of using the natural infection process to dissect the role of toxins in disease.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Genetic organization of the C. difficile PaLoc and analysis of toxin mutants.
Figure 2: Comparative analysis of toxin production by wild-type and mutant C. difficile strains.
Figure 3: Virulence of C. difficile wild-type and mutant strains in hamsters.


  1. 1

    McDonald, L. C. et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile . N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 2433–2441 (2005)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Warny, M. et al. Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet 366, 1079–1084 (2005)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Bartlett, J. G. et al. Role of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis. Gastroenterology 75, 778–782 (1978)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Bartlett, J. G. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 334–339 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Redelings, M. D., Sorvillo, F. & Mascola, L. Increase in Clostridium difficile-related mortality rates, United States, 1999–2004. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13, 1417–1419 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    O’Brien, J. A., Lahue, B. J., Caro, J. J. & Davidson, D. M. The emerging infectious challenge of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in Massachusetts hospitals: clinical and economic consequences. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 28, 1219–1227 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    von Eichel-Streiber, C. et al. Comparative sequence analysis of the Clostridium difficile toxins A and B. Mol. Gen. Genet. 233, 260–268 (1992)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Just, I. & Gerhard, R. Large clostridial cytotoxins. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 152, 23–47 (2004)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Voth, D. E. & Ballard, J. D. Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18, 247–263 (2005)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Jank, T. & Aktories, K. Structure and mode of action of clostridial glucosylating toxins: the ABCD model. Trends Microbiol. 16, 222–229 (2008)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Just, I. et al. Glucosylation of Rho proteins by Clostridium difficile toxin B. Nature 375, 500–503 (1995)

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Lyerly, D. M., Saum, K. E., MacDonald, D. K. & Wilkins, T. D. Effects of Clostridium difficile toxins given intragastrically to animals. Infect. Immun. 47, 349–352 (1985)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    O’Connor, J. R. et al. Construction and analysis of chromosomal Clostridium difficile mutants. Mol. Microbiol. 61, 1335–1351 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Heap, J. T. et al. The ClosTron: a universal gene knock-out system for the genus Clostridium . J. Microbiol. Methods 70, 452–464 (2007)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Dineen, S., Villapakkam, A. C., Nordman, J. T. & Sonenshein, A. L. Repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression by CodY. Mol. Microbiol. 66, 206–219 (2007)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Mani, N. et al. Environmental response and autoregulation of Clostridium difficile TxeR, a sigma factor for toxin gene expression. J. Bacteriol. 184, 5971–5978 (2002)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Matamouros, S., England, P. & Dupuy, B. Clostridium difficile toxin expression is inhibited by the novel regulator TcdC. Mol. Microbiol. 64, 1274–1288 (2007)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Schirmer, J. & Aktories, K. Large clostridial cytotoxins: cellular biology of Rho/Ras-glucosylating toxins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1673, 66–74 (2004)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Torres, J., Camorlinga-Ponce, M. & Munoz, O. Sensitivity in culture of epithelial cells from rhesus monkey kidney and human colon carcinoma to toxins A and B from Clostridium difficile . Toxicon 30, 419–426 (1992)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Giesemann, T. et al. Cholesterol-dependent pore formation of Clostridium difficile toxin A. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 10808–10815 (2006)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Burger, S. et al. Expression of recombinant Clostridium difficile toxin A using the Bacillus megaterium system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 307, 584–588 (2003)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Tang-Feldman, Y. J. et al. One-step cloning and expression of Clostridium difficile toxin B gene (tcdB). Mol. Cell. Probes 16, 179–183 (2002)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Sambol, S. P. et al. Infection of hamsters with epidemiologically important strains of Clostridium difficile . J. Infect. Dis. 183, 1760–1766 (2001)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Kim, P. H., Iaconis, J. P. & Rolfe, R. D. Immunization of adult hamsters against Clostridium difficile-associated ileocecitis and transfer of protection to infant hamsters. Infect. Immun. 55, 2984–2992 (1987)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Du, T. & Alfa, M. J. Translocation of Clostridium difficile toxin B across polarized Caco-2 cell monolayers is enhanced by toxin A. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 15, 83–88 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Drudy, D., Fanning, S. & Kyne, L. Toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile . Int. J. Infect. Dis. 11, 5–10 (2007)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Johnson, S. et al. Fatal pseudomembranous colitis associated with a variant Clostridium difficile strain not detected by toxin A immunoassay. Ann. Intern. Med. 135, 434–438 (2001)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Benson, L., Song, X., Campos, J. & Singh, N. Changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in children. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 28, 1233–1235 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Smith, C. J., Markowitz, S. M. & Macrina, F. L. Transferable tetracycline resistance in Clostridium difficile . Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 19, 997–1003 (1981)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Simon, R., Priefer, U. & Puhler, A. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Bio/Technology 1, 784–790 (1983)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Miller, J. H. Experiments in Molecular Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Inoue, H., Nojima, H. & Okayama, H. High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene 96, 23–28 (1990)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Sambrook, J. & Russell, D. W. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Carter, G. P. et al. Binary toxin production in Clostridium difficile is regulated by CdtR, a LytTR family response regulator. J. Bacteriol. 189, 7290–7301 (2007)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Lyras, D. & Rood, J. I. Conjugative transfer of RP4-oriT shuttle vectors from Escherichia coli to Clostridium perfringens . Plasmid 39, 160–164 (1998)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Lyras, D. & Rood, J. Transposition of Tn4451 and Tn4453 involves a circular intermediate that forms a promoter for the large resolvase, TnpX. Mol. Microbiol. 38, 588–601 (2000)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Razaq, N. et al. Infection of hamsters with historical and epidemic BI types of Clostridium difficile . J. Infect. Dis. 196, 1813–1819 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Clabots, C. R. et al. Development of a rapid and efficient restriction endonuclease analysis typing system for Clostridium difficile and correlation with other typing systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31, 1870–1875 (1993)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Research at Monash University was supported by Program Grant 284214 from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, funding from the ARC Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics and grant AI057637 from the United States National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. S.J., D.N.G. and G.V. were supported by Merit Review Grants from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Research Service. We thank D. Lyerly, K. Aktories and C. von-Eichel Streiber for providing toxin-A-specific and toxin-B-specific antibodies, K. Nagaro and A. Cheknis for assistance with the hamster experiments, V. K. Viswanathan for providing intestinal epithelial cell lines, E. Hartland for providing the HT29 cell line, and M. Merrigan for adherence assays.

Author Contributions D.L., J.R.O’C., G.P.C., V.A. and J.I.R. designed the genetic and molecular aspects of the research, which were carried out by D.L., P.M.H. and G.P.C. S.J., S.P.S., J.R.O’C. and D.N.G. planned and developed the animal experiments, which were carried out by S.P.S. and J.R.O’C. Tissue culture assays were designed, planned and carried out by D.L., G.P.C., R.P., T.P. and G.V. All authors were involved in data analysis and interpretation. The manuscript was primarily written by D.L. and J.I.R. but all authors had very significant input into its content and reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian I. Rood.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table

This file contains Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 46 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyras, D., O’Connor, J., Howarth, P. et al. Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile. Nature 458, 1176–1179 (2009).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing