Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale

Abstract

How and why organisms are distributed as they are has long intrigued evolutionary biologists1,2,3,4. The tendency for species to retain their ancestral ecology has been demonstrated in distributions on local and regional scales5,6,7, but the extent of ecological conservatism over tens of millions of years and across continents has not been assessed8,9,10,11,12,13. Here we show that biome stasis at speciation has outweighed biome shifts by a ratio of more than 25:1, by inferring ancestral biomes for an ecologically diverse sample of more than 11,000 plant species from around the Southern Hemisphere. Stasis was also prevalent in transocean colonizations. Availability of a suitable biome could have substantially influenced which lineages establish on more than one landmass, in addition to the influence of the rarity of the dispersal events themselves. Conversely, the taxonomic composition of biomes has probably been strongly influenced by the rarity of species’ transitions between biomes. This study has implications for the future because if clades have inherently limited capacity to shift biomes13, then their evolutionary potential could be strongly compromised by biome contraction as climate changes.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Biome shifts within landmasses.
Figure 2: Biome conservatism in transoceanic plant colonizations around the Southern Hemisphere.

References

  1. 1

    Darwin, C. Does sea-water kill seeds? Garden. Chron. 21, 356–357 (1855)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Raven, P. H. & Axelrod, D. I. Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 61, 539–673 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Hallam, A. An Outline of Phanerozoic Biogeography (Oxford Univ. Press, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Humphries, C. J. & Parenti, L. Cladistic Biogeography (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Losos, J. B. et al. Niche lability in the evolution of a Caribbean lizard community. Nature 424, 542–545 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Ackerly, D. D., Schwilk, D. W. & Webb, C. O. Niche evolution and adaptive radiation: testing the order of trait divergence. Ecology 87, S50–S61 (2006)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Silvertown, J. et al. Absence of phylogenetic signal in the niche structure of meadow plant communities. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 39–44 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Prinzing, A., Durka, W., Klotz, S. & Brandl, R. The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2383–2389 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Svenning, J. C. Deterministic Plio-Pleistocene extinctions in the European cool-temperate tree flora. Ecol. Lett. 6, 646–653 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Qian, H. & Ricklefs, R. E. Geographical distribution and ecological conservatism of disjunct genera of vascular plants in eastern Asia and eastern North America. J. Ecol. 92, 253–265 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Wiens, J. J. & Graham, C. H. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 519–539 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Ricklefs, R. E. History and diversity: explorations at the intersection of ecology and evolution. Am. Nat. 170 (suppl.), 56–70 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Losos, J. B. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol. Lett. 11, 995–1003 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Peterson, A. T., Soberon, J. & Sanchez-Cordero, V. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285, 1265–1267 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Pearman, P. B., Guisan, A., Broennimann, O. & Randin, C. F. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 149–158 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Woodward, F. I., Lomas, M. R. & Kelly, C. K. Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 1465–1476 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Wiens, J. J. & Donoghue, M. J. Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 639–644 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Crisp, M. D. Biome assembly: what we know and what we need to know. J. Biogeogr. 33, 1332–1333 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Linder, H. P. & Crisp, M. D. Nothofagus and Pacific biogeography. Cladistics 11, 5–32 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Sanmartín, I. & Ronquist, F. Southern Hemisphere biogeography inferred by event-based models: plant versus animal patterns. Syst. Biol. 53, 216–243 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    de Queiroz, A. The resurrection of oceanic dispersal in historical biogeography. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 68–73 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Hill, R. S. Origins of the southeastern Australian vegetation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 1537–1549 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Stromberg, C. A. E. Decoupled taxonomic radiation and ecological expansion of open-habitat grasses in the Cenozoic of North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11980–11984 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Crisp, M., Cook, L. G. & Steane, D. A. Radiation of the Australian flora: what can comparisons of molecular phylogenies across multiple taxa tell us about the evolution of diversity in present-day communities? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 1551–1571 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Alsos, I. G. et al. Frequent long-distance plant colonization in the changing Arctic. Science 316, 1606–1609 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Thuiller, W. et al. Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 2234–2250 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Peterson, A. T. Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q. Rev. Biol. 78, 419–433 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Orians, G. H. & Milewski, A. V. Ecology of Australia: the effects of nutrient-poor soils and intense fires. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 82, 393–423 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Burgoyne, P. M., van Wyk, A. E., Anderson, J. M. & Schrire, B. D. Phanerozoic evolution of plants on the African plate. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 43, 13–52 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Barreda, V. & Palazzesi, L. Patagonian vegetation turnovers during the Paleogene-early Neogene: Origin of arid-adapted floras. Bot. Rev. 73, 31–50 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. MESQUITE: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Mesquitehttp://mesquiteproject.org〉 (version 2.01, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Omland, K. E., Cook, L. G. & Crisp, M. D. Tree thinking for all biology: the problem with reading phylogenies as ladders of progress. Bioessays 30, 854–867 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Cook, L. G. & Crisp, M. D. Directional asymmetry of long-distance dispersal and colonisation could mislead reconstructions of biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 32, 741–754 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Lewis, P. O. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50, 913–925 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Crepet, W. L., Nixon, K. C. & Gandolfo, M. A. Fossil evidence and phylogeny: the age of major angiosperm clades based on mesofossil and macrofossil evidence from Cretaceous deposits. Am. J. Bot. 91, 1666–1682 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    McLoughlin, S. The breakup history of Gondwana and its impact on pre- Cenozoic floristic provincialism. Aust. J. Bot. 49, 271–300 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Cook, L. G. & Crisp, M. D. Not so ancient: the extant crown group of Nothofagus represents a post-Gondwanan radiation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272, 2535–2544 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Ladiges, P. Y. & Cantrill, D. New Caledonia-Australian connections: biogeographic patterns and geology. Aust. Syst. Bot. 20, 383–389 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Australian Research Council-New Zealand Research Network for Vegetation Function for facilitating this collaboration. Participation by M.A.G. and P.W. was supported in part by a grant from the US National Science Foundation.

Author Contributions All authors participated in two workshops where the phylogenetic and biome data were initially compiled. All authors participated in analysis and interpretation at the workshops and subsequently by email. M.W. designed and facilitated the study. M.A.G., G.J.J. and P.W. provided palaeobotanical dates. M.D.C. drafted the paper in collaboration with H.P.L., and provided supplementary statistical analyses during review.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Crisp.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Results, Supplementary Figures 1-2 with Legends, Supplementary Tables 1-6 and Supplementary References (PDF 493 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crisp, M., Arroyo, M., Cook, L. et al. Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature 458, 754–756 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07764

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing