Letter | Published:

Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast

Nature volume 457, pages 10331037 (19 February 2009) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Genome-wide pervasive transcription has been reported in many eukaryotic organisms1,2,3,4,5,6,7, revealing a highly interleaved transcriptome organization that involves hundreds of previously unknown non-coding RNAs8. These recently identified transcripts either exist stably in cells (stable unannotated transcripts, SUTs) or are rapidly degraded by the RNA surveillance pathway (cryptic unstable transcripts, CUTs). One characteristic of pervasive transcription is the extensive overlap of SUTs and CUTs with previously annotated features, which prompts questions regarding how these transcripts are generated, and whether they exert function9. Single-gene studies have shown that transcription of SUTs and CUTs can be functional, through mechanisms involving the generated RNAs10,11 or their generation itself12,13,14. So far, a complete transcriptome architecture including SUTs and CUTs has not been described in any organism. Knowledge about the position and genome-wide arrangement of these transcripts will be instrumental in understanding their function8,15. Here we provide a comprehensive analysis of these transcripts in the context of multiple conditions, a mutant of the exosome machinery and different strain backgrounds of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that both SUTs and CUTs display distinct patterns of distribution at specific locations. Most of the newly identified transcripts initiate from nucleosome-free regions (NFRs) associated with the promoters of other transcripts (mostly protein-coding genes), or from NFRs at the 3′ ends of protein-coding genes. Likewise, about half of all coding transcripts initiate from NFRs associated with promoters of other transcripts. These data change our view of how a genome is transcribed, indicating that bidirectionality is an inherent feature of promoters. Such an arrangement of divergent and overlapping transcripts may provide a mechanism for local spreading of regulatory signals—that is, coupling the transcriptional regulation of neighbouring genes by means of transcriptional interference or histone modification.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Accessions

Primary accessions

ArrayExpress

Data deposits

Raw data are available from ArrayExpress (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-TABM-590.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Global identification of human transcribed sequences with genome tiling arrays. Science 306, 2242–2246 (2004)

  2. 2.

    et al. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 309, 1559–1563 (2005)

  3. 3.

    et al. A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5320–5325 (2006)

  4. 4.

    et al. Dynamic transcriptome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe shown by RNA–DNA hybrid mapping. Nature Genet. 40, 977–986 (2008)

  5. 5.

    et al. Genome-wide transcription analyses in rice using tiling microarrays. Nature Genet. 38, 124–129 (2006)

  6. 6.

    et al. A gene expression map for the euchromatic genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 306, 655–660 (2004)

  7. 7.

    et al. Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution. Nature 453, 1239–1243 (2008)

  8. 8.

    , & Genome-wide transcription and the implications for genomic organization. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 413–423 (2007)

  9. 9.

    Transcriptional noise and the fidelity of initiation by RNA polymerase II. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 103–105 (2007)

  10. 10.

    , & A cryptic unstable transcript mediates transcriptional trans-silencing of the Ty1 retrotransposon in S. cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 22, 615–626 (2008)

  11. 11.

    et al. Antisense RNA stabilization induces transcriptional gene silencing via histone deacetylation in S. cerevisiae. Cell 131, 706–717 (2007)

  12. 12.

    , , & Repression of ADH1 and ADH3 during zinc deficiency by Zap1-induced intergenic RNA transcripts. EMBO J. 25, 5726–5734 (2006)

  13. 13.

    , , & Antisense transcription controls cell fate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 127, 735–745 (2006)

  14. 14.

    , & Intergenic transcription is required to repress the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SER3 gene. Nature 429, 571–574 (2004)

  15. 15.

    et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 447, 799–816 (2007)

  16. 16.

    , & Transcript mapping with high-density oligonucleotide tiling arrays. Bioinformatics 22, 1963–1970 (2006)

  17. 17.

    & Accumulation of unstable promoter-associated transcripts upon loss of the nuclear exosome subunit Rrp6p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3262–3267 (2006)

  18. 18.

    et al. Cryptic pol II transcripts are degraded by a nuclear quality control pathway involving a new poly(A) polymerase. Cell 121, 725–737 (2005)

  19. 19.

    et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 320, 1344–1349 (2008)

  20. 20.

    et al. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nature Genet. 39, 1235–1244 (2007)

  21. 21.

    et al. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol. 6, e65 (2008)

  22. 22.

    et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res. 18, 1073–1083 (2008)

  23. 23.

    , , & Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature 450, 1031–1035 (2007)

  24. 24.

    et al. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309, 626–630 (2005)

  25. 25.

    et al. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 446, 572–576 (2007)

  26. 26.

    , & Chance and necessity in chromosomal gene distributions. Trends Genet. 24, 216–219 (2008)

  27. 27.

    , & A role for noncoding transcription in activation of the yeast PHO5 gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8011–8016 (2007)

  28. 28.

    et al. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12825–12830 (2007)

  29. 29.

    , & Bidirectional transcription is an inherent feature of Giardia lamblia promoters and contributes to an abundance of sterile antisense transcripts throughout the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 2544–2553 (2007)

  30. 30.

    , , & Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, e128 (2007)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Akhtar, A. Ladurner, S. Blandin, R. Aiyar, E. Mancera and E. Fritsch for comments on the manuscript, J. Toedling for discussion and for the template of the website, C. Girardot for data submission to ArrayExpress, N. Proudfoot for access to experimental equipment, and the contributors to the Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org) and R (http://www.r-project.org) projects for their software. This work was supported by grants to L.M.S. from the National Institutes of Health and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, by a SystemsX fellowship to E.G., by a Roche fellowship to J.C. and by grants to F.S. from SNF and NCCR Frontiers in Genetics.

Author Contributions L.M.S., Z.X. and W.W. designed the research; Z.X. and W.W. annotated the transcripts with the help of J.G. and F.P.; W.W. and Z.X. performed analysis of the transcripts with the help of J.G.; F.P. and S.C.-M. performed the array hybridizations; J.C. E.G. and F.S. provided samples for the rrp6Δ mutant, and designed and performed validation polymerase chain reaction with reverse transcription and 5′ RACE experiments; L.M.S., J.G., F.S. and W.H. supervised the research; and L.M.S., Z.X., W.W., J.G. and W.H. wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Zhenyu Xu
    •  & Wu Wei

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany

    • Zhenyu Xu
    • , Wu Wei
    • , Julien Gagneur
    • , Fabiana Perocchi
    • , Sandra Clauder-Münster
    •  & Lars M. Steinmetz
  2. Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK

    • Jurgi Camblong
  3. Department of Cell Biology, Sciences III, University of Geneva, 30 Quai E. Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland

    • Elisa Guffanti
    •  & Françoise Stutz
  4. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK

    • Wolfgang Huber

Authors

  1. Search for Zhenyu Xu in:

  2. Search for Wu Wei in:

  3. Search for Julien Gagneur in:

  4. Search for Fabiana Perocchi in:

  5. Search for Sandra Clauder-Münster in:

  6. Search for Jurgi Camblong in:

  7. Search for Elisa Guffanti in:

  8. Search for Françoise Stutz in:

  9. Search for Wolfgang Huber in:

  10. Search for Lars M. Steinmetz in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars M. Steinmetz.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Data, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1, 2, 4, and 7-10, Supplementary References and Supplementary Figures 1-5 with Legends, (see separate files s2-s7 for Supplementary Tables 3, 5, 6 and 11-13).

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 3

    Supplementary Table 3: Transcript boundaries for ORF-Ts, SUTs and CUTs

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Table 5

    Supplementary Table 5: Primers used in this study, RT-PCR and 5’ RACE results

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Table 6

    Supplementary Table 6: List of SUTs with at least 2 fold increase in rrp6Δ vs. WT.

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Table 11

    Supplementary Table 11: Transcripts initiating from shared NFRs

  5. 5.

    Supplementary Table 12

    Supplementary Table 12: List of 19 examples like GAL80-SUR7

  6. 6.

    Supplementary Table 13

    Supplementary Table 13: Expression level of transcript pairs containing SUTs

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07728

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.