Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Neural processing of auditory feedback during vocal practice in a songbird


Songbirds are capable of vocal learning and communication1,2 and are ideally suited to the study of neural mechanisms of complex sensory and motor processing. Vocal communication in a noisy bird colony and vocal learning of a specific song template both require the ability to monitor auditory feedback3,4 to distinguish self-generated vocalizations from external sounds and to identify mismatches between the developing song and a memorized template acquired from a tutor5. However, neurons that respond to auditory feedback from vocal output have not been found in song-control areas despite intensive searching6,7,8. Here we investigate feedback processing outside the traditional song system, in single auditory forebrain neurons of juvenile zebra finches that were in a late developmental stage of song learning. Overall, we found similarity of spike responses during singing and during playback of the bird’s own song, with song responses commonly leading by a few milliseconds. However, brief time-locked acoustic perturbations of auditory feedback revealed complex sensitivity that could not be predicted from passive playback responses. Some neurons that responded to playback perturbations did not respond to song perturbations, which is reminiscent of sensory-motor mirror neurons8,9. By contrast, some neurons were highly feedback sensitive in that they responded vigorously to song perturbations, but not to unperturbed songs or perturbed playback. These findings suggest that a computational function of forebrain auditory areas may be to detect errors between actual feedback and mirrored feedback deriving from an internal model of the bird’s own song or that of its tutor. Such feedback-sensitive spikes could constitute the key signals that trigger adaptive motor responses to song disruptions10,11 or reinforce exploratory motor gestures for vocal learning12.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Comparison of active responses with passive responses.
Figure 2: Example perturbation responses.
Figure 3: Summary of perturbation selectivity.


  1. Marler, P. & Tamura, M. Culturally transmitted patterns of vocal behavior in sparrows. Science 146, 1483–1486 (1964)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thorpe, W. H. The biological significance of duetting and antiphonal song. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars.) 35, 517–528 (1975)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Konishi, M. The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. Z. Tierpsychol. 22, 770–783 (1965)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brainard, M. S. & Doupe, A. J. Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 31–40 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Immelman, K. in Bird Vocalizations (ed. Hinde, R. A.) 61–74 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leonardo, A. Experimental test of the birdsong error-correction model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16935–16940 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kozhevnikov, A. A. & Fee, M. S. Singing-related activity of identified HVC neurons in the zebra finch. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 4271–4283 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prather, J. F., Peters, S., Nowicki, S. & Mooney, R. Precise auditory–vocal mirroring in neurons for learned vocal communication. Nature 451, 305–310 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rizzolatti, G. & Craighero, L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169–192 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leonardo, A. & Konishi, M. Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback. Nature 399, 466–470 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tumer, E. C. & Brainard, M. S. Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong. Nature 450, 1240–1244 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiete, I. R., Fee, M. S. & Seung, H. S. Model of birdsong learning based on gradient estimation by dynamic perturbation of neural conductances. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 2038–2057 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karten, H. J. The ascending auditory pathway in the pigeon (Columba livia). II. Telencephalic projections of the nucleus ovoidalis thalami. Brain Res. 11, 134–153 (1968)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nottebohm, F., Kelley, D. B. & Paton, J. A. Connections of vocal control nuclei in the canary telencephalon. J. Comp. Neurol. 207, 344–357 (1982)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vates, G. E., Broome, B. M., Mello, C. V. & Nottebohm, F. Auditory pathways of caudal telencephalon and their relation to the song system of adult male zebra finches. J. Comp. Neurol. 366, 613–642 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Foster, E. F. & Bottjer, S. W. Axonal connections of the high vocal center and surrounding cortical regions in juvenile and adult male zebra finches. J. Comp. Neurol. 397, 118–138 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng, S., Zhang, X., Peng, W. & Zuo, M. Immunohistochemistry and neural connectivity of the Ov shell in the songbird and their evolutionary implications. J. Comp. Neurol. 470, 192–209 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cardin, J. A. & Schmidt, M. F. Song system auditory responses are stable and highly tuned during sedation, rapidly modulated and unselective during wakefulness, and suppressed by arousal. J. Neurophysiol. 90, 2884–2899 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bauer, E. E. et al. A synaptic basis for auditory-vocal integration in the songbird. J. Neurosci. 28, 1509–1522 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Janata, P. & Margoliash, D. Gradual emergence of song selectivity in sensorimotor structures of the male zebra finch song system. J. Neurosci. 19, 5108–5118 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Amin, N., Grace, J. A. & Theunissen, F. E. Neural response to bird’s own song and tutor song in the zebra finch field L and caudal mesopallium. J. Comp. Physiol. A 190, 469–489 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kimpo, R. R., Theunissen, F. E. & Doupe, A. J. Propagation of correlated activity through multiple stages of a neural circuit. J. Neurosci. 23, 5750–5761 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hahnloser, R. H., Kozhevnikov, A. A. & Fee, M. S. Sleep-related neural activity in a premotor and a basal-ganglia pathway of the songbird. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 794–812 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Poulet, J. F. & Hedwig, B. The cellular basis of a corollary discharge. Science 311, 518–522 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eliades, S. J. & Wang, X. Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 2194–2207 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eliades, S. J. & Wang, X. Neural substrates of vocalization feedback monitoring in primate auditory cortex. Nature 453, 1102–1106 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jordan, M. I. & Rumelhart, D. E. Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cogn. Sci. 16, 307–354 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Phan, M. L., Pytte, C. L. & Vicario, D. S. Early auditory experience generates long-lasting memories that may subserve vocal learning in songbirds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1088–1093 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. London, S. E. & Clayton, D. F. Functional identification of sensory mechanisms required for developmental song learning. Nature Neurosci. 11, 579–586 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fee, M. S. & Leonardo, A. Miniature motorized microdrive and commutator system for chronic neural recording in small animals. J. Neurosci. Methods 112, 83–94 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation Professorship Grant to R.H.R.H. We thank K. Martin, R. Mooney and R. Douglas for comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions G.B.K. performed the experiments and analysed the data. Both authors wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard H. R. Hahnloser.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures S1-S13, a Supplementary Discussion and a Supplementary Reference (PDF 3401 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, G., Hahnloser, R. Neural processing of auditory feedback during vocal practice in a songbird. Nature 457, 187–190 (2009).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing