Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

MicroRNAs to Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 coding regions modulate embryonic stem cell differentiation

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 26 March 2009


MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short RNAs that direct messenger RNA degradation or disrupt mRNA translation in a sequence-dependent manner1,2,3,4,5,6,7. For more than a decade, attempts to study the interaction of miRNAs with their targets were confined to the 3′ untranslated regions of mRNAs1, fuelling an underlying assumption that these regions are the principal recipients of miRNA activity. Here we focus on the mouse Nanog, Oct4 (also known as Pou5f1) and Sox2 genes8,9,10,11 and demonstrate the existence of many naturally occurring miRNA targets in their amino acid coding sequence (CDS). Some of the mouse targets analysed do not contain the miRNA seed, whereas others span exon–exon junctions or are not conserved in the human and rhesus genomes. miR-134, miR-296 and miR-470, upregulated on retinoic-acid-induced differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells, target the CDS of each transcription factor in various combinations, leading to transcriptional and morphological changes characteristic of differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells, and resulting in a new phenotype. Silent mutations at the predicted targets abolish miRNA activity, prevent the downregulation of the corresponding genes and delay the induced phenotype. Our findings demonstrate the abundance of CDS-located miRNA targets, some of which can be species-specific, and support an augmented model whereby animal miRNAs exercise their control on mRNAs through targets that can reside beyond the 3′ untranslated region.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: MicroRNA effect on the amount of the mRNA and protein of the corresponding predicted target.
Figure 2: MicroRNA effect on the amount of mRNA and protein of a CDS construct.
Figure 3: The mutant Nanog -CDS construct partially rescues miR-296 modulated mouse ESC differentiation.
Figure 4: Mutant Nanog- and Oct4 -CDS constructs partially rescue miR-470 modulated mouse ESC differentiation.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Bartel, D. P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116, 281–297 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Elbashir, S. M., Lendeckel, W. & Tuschl, T. RNA interference is mediated by 21- and 22-nucleotide RNAs. Genes Dev. 15, 188–200 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammond, S. M. Dicing and slicing: the core machinery of the RNA interference pathway. FEBS Lett. 579, 5822–5829 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hannon, G. J. RNA interference. Nature 418, 244–251 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lagos-Quintana, M., Rauhut, R., Lendeckel, W. & Tuschl, T. Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science 294, 853–858 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pillai, R. S., Bhattacharyya, S. N. & Filipowicz, W. Repression of protein synthesis by miRNAs: how many mechanisms? Trends Cell Biol. 17, 118–126 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pillai, R. S. MicroRNA function: multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA? RNA 11, 1753–1761 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J. & Smith, A. G. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nature Genet. 24, 372–376 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Okumura-Nakanishi, S., Saito, M., Niwa, H. & Ishikawa, F. Oct-3/4 and Sox2 regulate Oct-3/4 gene in embryonic stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 5307–5317 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan, G. & Thomson, J. A. Nanog and transcriptional networks in embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Cell Res. 17, 42–49 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitsui, K. et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113, 631–642 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Slack, F. J. et al. The lin-41 RBCC gene acts in the C. elegans heterochronic pathway between the let-7 regulatory RNA and the LIN-29 transcription factor. Mol. Cell 5, 659–669 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L. & Ambros, V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14 . Cell 75, 843–854 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Easow, G., Teleman, A. A. & Cohen, S. M. Isolation of microRNA targets by miRNP immunopurification. RNA 13, 1198–1204 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lytle, J. R., Yario, T. A. & Steitz, J. A. Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5′ UTR as in the 3′ UTR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9667–9672 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bentwich, I. Prediction and validation of microRNAs and their targets. FEBS Lett. 579, 5904–5910 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajewsky, N. microRNA target predictions in animals. Nature Genet. 38, S8–S13 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miranda, K. C. et al. A pattern-based method for the identification of microRNA binding sites and their corresponding heteroduplexes. Cell 126, 1203–1217 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kloosterman, W. P., Wienholds, E., Ketting, R. F. & Plasterk, R. H. Substrate requirements for let-7 function in the developing zebrafish embryo. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 6284–6291 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva, J., Chambers, I., Pollard, S. & Smith, A. Nanog promotes transfer of pluripotency after cell fusion. Nature 441, 997–1001 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Loh, Y. H. et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 38, 431–440 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chambers, I. et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113, 643–655 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tay, Y. M. et al. MicroRNA-134 modulates the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells, where it causes post-transcriptional attenuation of Nanog and LRH1. Stem Cells 26, 17–29 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmqvist, L. et al. Correlation of murine embryonic stem cell gene expression profiles with functional measures of pluripotency. Stem Cells 23, 663–680 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Duursma, A. M., Kedde, M., Schrier, M., le Sage, C. & Agami, R. miR-148 targets human DNMT3b protein coding region. RNA 14, 872–877 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lal, A. et al. p16INK4atranslation suppressed by miR-24. PLoS ONE 3, e1864 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hobert, O. Gene regulation by transcription factors and microRNAs. Science 319, 1785–1786 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Floyd, S. K. & Bowman, J. L. Gene regulation: ancient microRNA target sequences in plants. Nature 428, 485–486 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Didiano, D. & Hobert, O. Perfect seed pairing is not a generally reliable predictor for miRNA-target interactions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 849–851 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomson, A. M. et al. The acute box cis-element in human heavy ferritin mRNA 5′-untranslated region is a unique translation enhancer that binds poly(C)-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 30032–30045 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank T. Huynh for assistance with building the rna22 pipeline that was used to make the miRNA target predictions, and H. Zhang and Y. L. Lee for their help with some of the constructs. The work of Y.T., J.Z., A.M.T. and B.L. was supported by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore. Y.T. was the recipient of an A*STAR graduate scholarship. B.L. was also partially supported by National Institutes of Health grants DK47636 and AI54973.

Author Contributions Y.T. carried out the experiments and assisted with writing the paper. J.Z. assisted with the experiments. A.M.T. assisted with and supervised the experiments, and assisted with writing the paper. B.L. supervised the experiments and supported the experimental aspects of the research. I.R. designed the research and experiments, carried out the computational analyses and wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isidore Rigoutsos.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figures 1-13 and References (PDF 3522 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tay, Y., Zhang, J., Thomson, A. et al. MicroRNAs to Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 coding regions modulate embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nature 455, 1124–1128 (2008).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing