Letter | Published:

Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species

Nature volume 455, pages 12351239 (30 October 2008) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Global amphibian declines have often been attributed to disease1,2, but ignorance of the relative importance and mode of action of potential drivers of infection has made it difficult to develop effective remediation. In a field study, here we show that the widely used herbicide, atrazine, was the best predictor (out of more than 240 plausible candidates) of the abundance of larval trematodes (parasitic flatworms) in the declining northern leopard frog Rana pipiens. The effects of atrazine were consistent across trematode taxa. The combination of atrazine and phosphate—principal agrochemicals in global corn and sorghum production—accounted for 74% of the variation in the abundance of these often debilitating larval trematodes (atrazine alone accounted for 51%). Analysis of field data supported a causal mechanism whereby both agrochemicals increase exposure and susceptibility to larval trematodes by augmenting snail intermediate hosts and suppressing amphibian immunity. A mesocosm experiment demonstrated that, relative to control tanks, atrazine tanks had immunosuppressed tadpoles, had significantly more attached algae and snails, and had tadpoles with elevated trematode loads, further supporting a causal relationship between atrazine and elevated trematode infections in amphibians. These results raise concerns about the role of atrazine and phosphate in amphibian declines, and illustrate the value of quantifying the relative importance of several possible drivers of disease risk while determining the mechanisms by which they facilitate disease emergence.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306, 1783–1786 (2004)

  2. 2.

    , & Infectious disease and amphibian population declines. Divers. Distrib. 9, 141–150 (2003)

  3. 3.

    , & Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal. Science 282, 2256–2258 (1998)

  4. 4.

    & Mechanisms of disease-induced extinction. Ecol. Lett. 8, 117–126 (2005)

  5. 5.

    & Good medicine for conservation biology: The intersection of epidemiology and conservation theory. Conserv. Biol. 16, 593–604 (2002)

  6. 6.

    , & Relationship of tadpole stage to location of echinostome cercariae encystment and the consequences for tadpole survival. J. Parasitol. 89, 475–482 (2003)

  7. 7.

    & Amphibian deformities and Ribeiroia infection: An emerging helminthiasis. Trends Parasitol. 19, 332–335 (2003)

  8. 8.

    et al. in Disease Ecology: Community Structure and Pathogen Dynamics (eds Collinge, S. K. & Ray, C.) 153–167 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006)

  9. 9.

    et al. in Status and Conservation of U.S. Amphibians (ed. Lannoo, M. J.) 153–167 (Univ. Chicago Press, 2003)

  10. 10.

    et al. Aquatic eutrophication promotes pathogenic infection in amphibians. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15781–15786 (2007)

  11. 11.

    , , & The effect of trematode infection on amphibian limb development and survivorship. Science 284, 802–804 (1999)

  12. 12.

    , , & Influence of Ribeiroia ondatrae (Trematoda: Digenea) infection on limb development and survival of northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens): effects of host stage and parasite-exposure level. Can. J. Zool. 81, 1144–1153 (2003)

  13. 13.

    in Amphibian Declines: The Conservation and Status of United States Species (ed. Lannoo, M. J.) (Univ. California Press, 2005)

  14. 14.

    , , & Understanding the net effects of pesticides on amphibian trematode infections. Ecol. Appl. (in the press)

  15. 15.

    , & Pesticide Industry Sales and Usage: 2000 and 2001 Market Estimates (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2004)

  16. 16.

    Atrazine Risk Characterization Document (California Department of Pesticide Regulation, 2001)

  17. 17.

    , & Ecological Risks of Pesticides in Freshwater Ecosystems Part 1: Herbicides Alterra-Rapport 088 (Alterra, Green World Research, 2000)

  18. 18.

    , , & Atrazine is an immune disruptor in adult northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26, 80–84 (2007)

  19. 19.

    Synergism between trematode infection and pesticide exposure: A link to amphibian limb deformities in nature? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9900–9904 (2002)

  20. 20.

    & Effects of atrazine and iridovirus infection on survival and life-history traits of the long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 25, 168–173 (2006)

  21. 21.

    Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006)

  22. 22.

    et al. Histopathology and ultrastructure of Platichthys flesus naturally infected with Anisakis simplex S.L. larvae (Nematoda: Anisakidae). J. Parasitol. 93, 1416–1423 (2007)

  23. 23.

    & The divergent roles of alternatively activated macrophages in helminthic infections. Parasite Immunol. 29, 609–619 (2007)

  24. 24.

    & Melano-macrophage centres and their role in fish pathology. J. Fish Dis. 26, 499–509 (2003)

  25. 25.

    & Effects of an herbicide and an insecticide on pond community structure and processes. Ecol. Appl. 15, 1135–1147 (2005)

  26. 26.

    , & Community ecology as a framework for predicting contaminant effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 606–613 (2006)

  27. 27.

    , & Declines of the California red-legged frog: Climate, UV-B, habitat, and pesticides hypotheses. Ecol. Appl. 11, 464–479 (2001)

  28. 28.

    et al. Hermaphroditic, demasculinized frogs after exposure to the herbicide atrazine at low ecologically relevant doses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5476–5480 (2002)

  29. 29.

    & Survivorship patterns of larval amphibians exposed to low concentrations of atrazine. Environ. Health Perspect. 112, 1054–1057 (2004)

  30. 30.

    , , & Exposure, postexposure, and density-mediated effects of atrazine on amphibians: Breaking down net effects into their parts. Environ. Health Perspect. 114, 46–50 (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Murphy, A. Antolin, K. Beckman, R. Cole, A. Koehler, C. Hall, T. Hollenhorst and J. Romansic for collection and compilation of field, parasitological or land cover data; R. Cole, M. Martin, M. Mescher, J. Romansic, J. Runyon and the O. Bjørnstad, C. De Moraes, E. Holmes, P. Hudson, B. Grenfell and M. Poss laboratories for comments and suggestions on this work; and J. Grace for reviewing sections of the paper on structural equation modelling. We also thank the USGS National Wildlife Health Center for laboratory space and support. Funds came from National Science Foundation (DEB-0809487) and US Department of Agriculture (NRI 2008-00622 and 2008-01785) grants to J.R.R., and US Environmental Protection Agency STAR grants to V.R.B. (R825867) and J.R.R. and T.R.R (R833835). This work does not necessarily reflect the views of these agencies.

Author Contributions For the field survey, V.R.B. and L.B.J. designed the data collection. C.M.J., P.K.S., C.L. and A.M.S. conducted the survey. C.M.J. coordinated data collection, assembly and management. M.D.P. conducted all analyte analyses. A.M.S. performed amphibian necropsies of R. pipiens for parasite quantification. C.L. quantified amphibian immunity. For the mesocosm study, J.R.R., T.R.R. and J.T.H. designed and implemented the experiment. J.R.R. oversaw all components the study. T.R.R. and N.H. processed amphibian samples and quantified amphibian immune parameters. H.J.C. quantified periphyton and phytoplankton. J.R.R. conducted all statistical analyses and wrote the paper. A.M.S. wrote parts of the Supplementary Methods. The paper was edited by all authors.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA

    • Jason R. Rohr
    • , Thomas R. Raffel
    •  & Neal Halstead
  2. Penn State Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

    • Jason R. Rohr
    •  & Thomas R. Raffel
  3. College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61802, USA

    • Anna M. Schotthoefer
    • , Camilla Lieske
    •  & Val R. Beasley
  4. School of Forest Resources, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

    • Hunter J. Carrick
  5. Department of Forest, Wildlife and Fisheries, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-4563, USA

    • Jason T. Hoverman
  6. Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota 55811, USA

    • Catherine M. Johnson
    • , Lucinda B. Johnson
    •  & Patrick K. Schoff
  7. Illinois Waste Management and Research Center, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA

    • Marvin D. Piwoni

Authors

  1. Search for Jason R. Rohr in:

  2. Search for Anna M. Schotthoefer in:

  3. Search for Thomas R. Raffel in:

  4. Search for Hunter J. Carrick in:

  5. Search for Neal Halstead in:

  6. Search for Jason T. Hoverman in:

  7. Search for Catherine M. Johnson in:

  8. Search for Lucinda B. Johnson in:

  9. Search for Camilla Lieske in:

  10. Search for Marvin D. Piwoni in:

  11. Search for Patrick K. Schoff in:

  12. Search for Val R. Beasley in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason R. Rohr.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Methods and Discussion, Supplementary Tables S1-S8, and Supplementary Figures S1-S6.  Supplementary Table S8 for this Letter should have been uploaded at the time of publication. This oversight was rectified no 06 January 2009

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07281

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.