Letter | Published:

The evolutionary origin of flatfish asymmetry

Nature volume 454, pages 209212 (10 July 2008) | Download Citation

Abstract

All adult flatfishes (Pleuronectiformes), including the gastronomically familiar plaice, sole, turbot and halibut, have highly asymmetrical skulls, with both eyes placed on one side of the head. This arrangement, one of the most extraordinary anatomical specializations among vertebrates, arises through migration of one eye during late larval development. Although the transformation of symmetrical larvae into asymmetrical juveniles is well documented1,2,3,4,5,6,7, the evolutionary origins of flatfish asymmetry are uncertain1,2 because there are no transitional forms linking flatfishes with their symmetrical relatives8,9. The supposed inviability of such intermediates gave pleuronectiforms a prominent role in evolutionary debates10,11,12,13,14,15,16, leading to attacks on natural selection11 and arguments for saltatory change14,15. Here I show that Amphistium and the new genus Heteronectes, both extinct spiny-finned fishes from the Eocene epoch of Europe, are the most primitive pleuronectiforms known. The orbital region of the skull in both taxa is strongly asymmetrical, as in living flatfishes, but these genera retain many primitive characters unknown in extant forms. Most remarkably, orbital migration was incomplete in Amphistium and Heteronectes, with eyes remaining on opposite sides of the head in post-metamorphic individuals. This condition is intermediate between that in living pleuronectiforms and the arrangement found in other fishes. Amphistium and Heteronectes indicate that the evolution of the profound cranial asymmetry of extant flatfishes was gradual in nature.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The asymmetry, metamorphosis, and origin of flat-fishes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 211, 75–129 (1923)

  2. 2.

    A Systematic Monograph of the Flatfishes (Heterosomata). Vol. 1. Psettotidae, Bothidae, Pleuronectidae (British Museum (Natural History), London, 1934)

  3. 3.

    , , , & in Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes (eds Moser, H. G. et al.) 640–670 (Allen, Lawrence, Kansas, 1984)

  4. 4.

    , , , & Asymmetrical development of bones and soft tissues during eye migration of metamorphosing Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Cell Tissue Res. 304, 59–66 (2001)

  5. 5.

    & Development of the bony skull in common sole: brief survey of morpho-functional aspects of ossification sequence. J. Fish Biol. 59, 1350–1369 (2001)

  6. 6.

    Fixing the confused term “pseudomesial bar” and homologies of pleuronectiform cranial elements, with proposals of new terms. Ichthyol. Res. 53, 435–440 (2006)

  7. 7.

    Asymmetric craniofacial remodeling and lateralized behavior in larval flatfish. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 610–621 (2006)

  8. 8.

    A cladistic reappraisal of the fossil flatfishes record consequences on the phylogeny of the Pleuronectiformes (Osteichthyes: Teleostei). Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. 18, 105–117 (1997)

  9. 9.

    Supposed and true flatfishes [Teleostei: Pleuronectiformes] from the Eocene of Monte Bolca, Italy. Stud. Ric. Giacim. Terz. Bolca 8, 220–243 (1999)

  10. 10.

    Philosophie Zoologique (Dentu, Paris, 1809)

  11. 11.

    On the Genesis of Species (MacMillan, London, 1871)

  12. 12.

    On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection 6th edn (Murray, London, 1872)

  13. 13.

    Darwinism (MacMillan and Co., London, 1889)

  14. 14.

    Some aspects of evolution. Science 78, 539–547 (1933)

  15. 15.

    The Material Basis of Evolution (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1940)

  16. 16.

    The role of ecological factors in the origin of higher levels of organization. Syst. Zool. 14, 288–300 (1965)

  17. 17.

    Eubuglossus eocenicus (Woodward 1910) from the Upper Lutetian of Egypt, one of the oldest soleids (Teleostei, Pleuronectiformes). Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläntol. Monatsh. 1994, 391–398 (1994)

  18. 18.

    , , & Early Eocene amber from the “Pesciara di Bolca” (Lessini Mountains, Northern Italy). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 223, 260–274 (2005)

  19. 19.

    Pleuronectiform relationships: a cladistic reassessment. Bull. Mar. Sci. 52, 516–540 (1993)

  20. 20.

    Les poissons fossiles du Monte Bolca. Classés jusqu’ici dans les familles des Carangidae, Menidae, Ephippidae, Scatophagidae. Mem. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Verona 1, 1–525 (1969)

  21. 21.

    Sur un Amphistium (poisson téléostéen, Percoidei) de l’Éocène Parisien. Bull. Inf. Géol. Bass. Paris 16, 11–14 (1979)

  22. 22.

    , & Descriptions of larval fishes of the genera Psettodes (Psettotidae) and Pseuorhombus (Paralichthyidae) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 39, 51–70 (1988)

  23. 23.

    The perciform caudal skeleton. Copeia 1961, 265–270 (1961)

  24. 24.

    An overview of the early fossil record of acanthomorphs. Bull. Mar. Sci. 52, 29–59 (1993)

  25. 25.

    & Percomorph phylogeny: a survey of acanthomorphs and a new proposal. Bull. Mar. Sci. 52, 554–626 (1993)

  26. 26.

    & Bilateral asymmetry and bilateral variation in fishes. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 30, 229–310 (1944)

  27. 27.

    From symmetry to asymmetry: phylogenetic patterns of asymmetry variation in animals and their evolutionary significance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14279–14286 (1996)

  28. 28.

    , & Observations of fin use in relation to feeding and resting behavior in flatfishes (Pleuronectiformes). Copeia 1973, 154–156 (1973)

  29. 29.

    in The Fossil Record 2 (ed. Benton, M. J.) 621–656 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1993)

  30. 30.

    , , & in Assembling the Tree of Life (eds Cracraft, J. & Donoghue, M. J.) 410–429 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2004)

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank G. Clément, P. Forey, D. Goujet, M. Richter, O. Schultz, A. Vaccari and M. Véran for loaning or providing access to fossil specimens; R. Arrindell, B. Brown, D. Johnson, S. Raredon, M. Rogers and M. Westneat for arranging the loan or study of recent material; E. Hilton for checking gill-arch characters in carangids; M. Colbert and A. Gosselin-Ildari for compiling the computed tomography renderings, K. Claeson for providing specimen transport; L. Herzog, A. Shinya, D. Wagner and J. Holstein for helping in fossil preparation; and A. Bannikov, M. Coates, M. LaBarbera and N. Smith for discussion. This work was supported by a grant from the Lerner-Grey Fund for Marine Research, a Hinds Fund Grant, an Evolving Earth Grant, a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (award number DGE-0228235), and an Environmental Protection Agency STAR Fellowship (award number FP916730).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, 1025 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

    • Matt Friedman
  2. Department of Geology, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA

    • Matt Friedman

Authors

  1. Search for Matt Friedman in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Friedman.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    The file contains Supplementary Information which includes the following sections: I. Institutional abbreviations; II. Supplementary morphological data: †Heteronectes chaneti; III. Details of computed tomography (CT); IV. Supplementary morphological data: †Amphistium; V. Legends for CT rendering movies; VI. Characters used in cladistic analysis; VII. Comparative materials used to code characters: fossil taxa; VIII. Comparative materials used to code characters: Recent taxa; IX. Taxon-by-character matrix; X. Systematic methodology; XI. Character optimisations; XII. additional references.. The file also includes Supplementary Figures 1-20 with Legends.

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    The file contains Supplementary Movie 1 showing CT rendering of neurocranium of †Amphistium paradoxum (BMNH P.16138; dextral morph).  Animation begins with neurocranium in right-lateral view (damaged side with unmigrated orbit; the skull was fractured when the slab containing the fish was split), then rotates the skull 360 degrees about a vertical axis. Upon returning to start position, the skull rotates the skull 360 degrees about its long axis, showing ventral, left-lateral (side with migrated orbit), and dorsal views. Specimen missing ethmoid region and parasphenoid (broken off block). A still image of the CT rendering and interpretive line drawing are given in Supplementary figure 10. A photograph of the complete specimen is shown in Supplementary figure 8, and a close-up of the skull in Supplementary figure 9.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary information

    The file contains Supplementary Movie 2 showing CT rendering of neurocranium of †Amphistium paradoxum (BMNH P.1982; dextral morph).  Animation begins with neurocranium in right-lateral view (damaged side with unmigrated orbit; the skull was fractured when the slab containing the fish was split), then rotates the skull 360 degrees about a vertical axis. Upon returning to start position, the skull rotates the skull 360 degrees about its long axis showing ventral, left-lateral (side with migrated orbit), and dorsal views. The latter clearly shows medial extent of migrated orbit. A still image of the CT rendering and interpretive line drawing are given in Supplementary figure

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07108

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.