Article | Published:

The branching programme of mouse lung development

Nature volume 453, pages 745750 (05 June 2008) | Download Citation

Abstract

Mammalian lungs are branched networks containing thousands to millions of airways arrayed in intricate patterns that are crucial for respiration. How such trees are generated during development, and how the developmental patterning information is encoded, have long fascinated biologists and mathematicians. However, models have been limited by a lack of information on the normal sequence and pattern of branching events. Here we present the complete three-dimensional branching pattern and lineage of the mouse bronchial tree, reconstructed from an analysis of hundreds of developmental intermediates. The branching process is remarkably stereotyped and elegant: the tree is generated by three geometrically simple local modes of branching used in three different orders throughout the lung. We propose that each mode of branching is controlled by a genetically encoded subroutine, a series of local patterning and morphogenesis operations, which are themselves controlled by a more global master routine. We show that this hierarchical and modular programme is genetically tractable, and it is ideally suited to encoding and evolving the complex networks of the lung and other branched organs.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The Pathway for Oxygen (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984)

  2. 2.

    , & A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276, 122–126 (1997)

  3. 3.

    Shape and Structure, From Engineering to Nature (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000)

  4. 4.

    , , & An optimal bronchial tree may be dangerous. Nature 427, 633–636 (2004)

  5. 5.

    Der Bronchialbaum der Säugethiere und des Menschen, nebst Bemerkungen über den Bronchialbaum der Vögel und Reptilien (Engelmann, Leipzig, 1880)

  6. 6.

    Segmental Anatomy of the Lungs; a Study of the Patterns of the Segmental Bronchi and Related Pulmonary Vessels (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955)

  7. 7.

    & Architecture of the human lung. Science 137, 577–585 (1962)

  8. 8.

    Morphometry of the Human Lung (Academic, New York, 1963)

  9. 9.

    & Genetic control of branching morphogenesis. Science 284, 1635–1639 (1999)

  10. 10.

    Morphogenesis of lines and nets. Differentiation 6, 117–123 (1976)

  11. 11.

    The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, New York, 1983)

  12. 12.

    & Modeling of lung morphogenesis using fractal geometries. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 7, 321–327 (1988)

  13. 13.

    & The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants (Springer, New York, 1990)

  14. 14.

    , & A three-dimensional model of the human airway tree. J. Appl. Physiol. 87, 2207–2217 (1999)

  15. 15.

    , & Generation of an anatomically based three-dimensional model of the conducting airways. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28, 793–802 (2000)

  16. 16.

    Modeling lung branching morphogenesis. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 81, 291–310 (2007)

  17. 17.

    , , & Interaction of epithelium with mesenchyme affects global features of lung architecture: a computer model of development. J. Appl. Physiol. 102, 294–305 (2007)

  18. 18.

    & Regulation of early lung morphogenesis: questions, facts and controversies. Development 133, 1611–1624 (2006)

  19. 19.

    Zur Bildungsgeschichte der Lungen beim menschlichen Embryo. Arch. Anat. Entwicklungsgeschichte 1887, 89–106 (1887)

  20. 20.

    Development of the lungs. Am. J. Anat. 6, 1–138 (1906)

  21. 21.

    Zur Entwicklung und Anatomie der menschlichen Lunge. Arch. Anat. Physiol. Anatomische Abteilung 1919, 1–129 (1919)

  22. 22.

    The development in vitro of the submandibular and sublingual glands of Mus musculus. J. Anat. 84, 287–302 (1950)

  23. 23.

    Osservazioni su culture organotipiche di polmone embrionale di topo. Arch. Ital. Anat. Embriol. 65, 323–363 (1960)

  24. 24.

    et al. In vitro branching morphogenesis of the fetal rat lung. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 15, 89–97 (1993)

  25. 25.

    & Real-time analysis of ureteric bud branching morphogenesis in vitro. Dev. Biol. 271, 98–108 (2004)

  26. 26.

    , , & Mutation of an axonemal dynein affects left–right asymmetry in inversus viscerum mice. Nature 389, 963–966 (1997)

  27. 27.

    & Visceral inversion and associated anomalies in the mouse. J. Hered. 50, 9–13 (1959)

  28. 28.

    , , & Sprouty2, a mouse deafness gene, regulates cell fate decisions in the auditory sensory epithelium by antagonizing FGF signaling. Dev. Cell 8, 553–564 (2005)

  29. 29.

    et al. Sprouty encodes a novel antagonist of FGF signaling that patterns apical branching of the Drosophila airways. Cell 92, 253–263 (1998)

  30. 30.

    et al. Vertebrate Sprouty genes are induced by FGF signaling and can cause chondrodysplasia when overexpressed. Development 126, 4465–4475 (1999)

  31. 31.

    et al. Mouse Genome Database〉 (2005)

  32. 32.

    Morphogenesis. Cell 96, 225–233 (1999)

  33. 33.

    et al. Molecular mechanisms of early lung specification and branching morphogenesis. Pediatr. Res. 57, 26R–37R (2005)

  34. 34.

    , & Transcriptional control of lung morphogenesis. Physiol. Rev. 87, 219–244 (2007)

  35. 35.

    & Architectural patterns in branching morphogenesis in the kidney. Kidney Int. 54, 1832–1842 (1998)

  36. 36.

    , & Comparative mechanisms of branching morphogenesis in diverse systems. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 11, 213–228 (2006)

  37. 37.

    & Branching morphogenesis in the prostate gland and seminal vesicles. Differentiation 74, 382–392 (2006)

  38. 38.

    & A morphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb. Evol. Biol. 20, 319–387 (1986)

  39. 39.

    , & Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388, 639–648 (1997)

  40. 40.

    et al. Evolution and development of inflorescence architectures. Science 316, 1452–1456 (2007)

  41. 41.

    & The development of the bronchopulmonary segments in human embryos of horizons XVII to XIX. Am. J. Anat. 95, 163–201 (1954)

  42. 42.

    , , & Expression and role of E- and P-cadherin adhesion molecules in embryonic histogenesis. I. Lung epithelial morphogenesis. Development 105, 263–270 (1989)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Krasnow laboratory and P. Brown, D. Brutlag, N. Hacohen, D. Kingsley, L. Mündermann, J. Spudich and E. Storm for advice and discussion, and M. Kumar and M. Petersen for help with preparing the figures. This work was funded by grants from National Institutes of Health (to M.A.K. and G.R.M.). M.A.K. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author Contributions R.J.M. and M.A.K. conceived the experiments. R.J.M. designed and performed experiments and collected data. O.D.K. and G.R.M. contributed to conception and design of the Spry2 experiments and provided genotyped Spry2 embryos. R.J.M. and M.A.K. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed results and edited the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Ross J. Metzger
    •  & Ophir D. Klein

    Present addresses: Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, California 94158-2517, USA (R.J.M.); Departments of Orofacial Sciences and Pediatrics, and Institute of Human Genetics, Schools of Dentistry and Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0442, USA (O.D.K.).

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and HHMI, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5307, USA

    • Ross J. Metzger
    •  & Mark A. Krasnow
  2. Department of Anatomy and Program in Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158-2324, USA

    • Ophir D. Klein
    •  & Gail R. Martin

Authors

  1. Search for Ross J. Metzger in:

  2. Search for Ophir D. Klein in:

  3. Search for Gail R. Martin in:

  4. Search for Mark A. Krasnow in:

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ross J. Metzger or Mark A. Krasnow.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Figure 1

    The file contains Supplementary Figure 1, showing the branching lineage of the mouse bronchial tree as 29 separate panels which can be assembled into a single lineage figure.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Figure 1'

    This file contains Supplementary Figure 1', the aligned and assembled branching lineage of the mouse bronchial tree.

  3. 3.

    Legend to Supplementary Figures 1 and 1'

    This file contains the Legend to Supplementary Figures 1 and 1'.

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Figures 2-5

    This file contains Supplementary Figures 2-5 with Legends.

  5. 5.

    Additional details

    This file contains additional details of the immunostaining protocols used in this study.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07005

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.