Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Koenigs et al. reply

Abstract

Replying to: G. Kahane & N. Shackel Nature 452, doi:10.1038/nature06785 (2008)

Kahane and Shackel argue1, on the basis of a re-classification of the moral scenarios used in our study2, that our conclusion of a utilitarian bias among patients with ventromedial–prefrontal–cortex (VMPC) damage is unwarranted. Here we provide a re-analysis of our data based on precisely the classification scheme that Kahane and Shackel suggest. This re-analysis confirms our conclusion that damage to the VMPC results in an increase in utilitarian judgements.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Kahane, G. & Shackel, N. Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias? Nature 452, 10.1038/06785 (2008)

  2. 2

    Koenigs, M. et al. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature 446, 908–911 (2007)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Wheatley, T. & Haidt, J. Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychol. Sci. 16, 780–784 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Valdesolo, P. & DeSteno, D. Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychol. Sci. 17, 476–477 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Ladavas, E. & di Pellegrino, G. Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 84–92 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Hauser, M. D. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed a Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (Harper Collins, New York, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Cushman, F. A., Young, L. & Hauser, M. D. The role of conscious reasoning and intuitions in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1082–1089 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M. & Saxe, R. The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8235–8240 (2007)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R. et al. Koenigs et al. reply. Nature 452, E5–E6 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06804

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing