Letter | Published:

Winners don’t punish

Nature volume 452, pages 348351 (20 March 2008) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

A key aspect of human behaviour is cooperation1,2,3,4,5,6,7. We tend to help others even if costs are involved. We are more likely to help when the costs are small and the benefits for the other person significant. Cooperation leads to a tension between what is best for the individual and what is best for the group. A group does better if everyone cooperates, but each individual is tempted to defect. Recently there has been much interest in exploring the effect of costly punishment on human cooperation8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23. Costly punishment means paying a cost for another individual to incur a cost. It has been suggested that costly punishment promotes cooperation even in non-repeated games and without any possibility of reputation effects10. But most of our interactions are repeated and reputation is always at stake. Thus, if costly punishment is important in promoting cooperation, it must do so in a repeated setting. We have performed experiments in which, in each round of a repeated game, people choose between cooperation, defection and costly punishment. In control experiments, people could only cooperate or defect. Here we show that the option of costly punishment increases the amount of cooperation but not the average payoff of the group. Furthermore, there is a strong negative correlation between total payoff and use of costly punishment. Those people who gain the highest total payoff tend not to use costly punishment: winners don’t punish. This suggests that costly punishment behaviour is maladaptive in cooperation games and might have evolved for other reasons.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35–57 (1971)

  2. 2.

    & The evolution of cooperation. Science 211, 1390–1396 (1981)

  3. 3.

    & Evolution and cooperation in noisy repeated games. Am. Econ. Rev. 80, 274–279 (1990)

  4. 4.

    & Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature 355, 250–253 (1992)

  5. 5.

    & Evolutionary stability in repeated games played by finite automata. J. Econ. Theory 57, 278–305 (1992)

  6. 6.

    Game Theory and its Applications in the Social and Biological Sciences (Routledge, New York, 1995)

  7. 7.

    Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006)

  8. 8.

    The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 110–116 (1986)

  9. 9.

    , & Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 86, 404–417 (1992)

  10. 10.

    & Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002)

  11. 11.

    , , & Social norms and social choice (Working Paper no. 05-23, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, 2005)

  12. 12.

    & The economics of altruistic punishment and the demise of cooperation (IZA Discussion Paper no. 1646, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, 2005)

  13. 13.

    & A comparative statics analysis of punishment in public-good experiments (Discussion Paper in Economics no. 05/07, Royal Holloway Univ. London, London, 2005)

  14. 14.

    , & Voluntary association in public goods experiments: reciprocity, mimicry and efficiency. Econ. J. 115, 1032–1053 (2005)

  15. 15.

    , & Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 60, 11–26 (2006)

  16. 16.

    , & The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312, 108–111 (2006)

  17. 17.

    & The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Nature 444, 718–723 (2006)

  18. 18.

    , & Punishment, counterpunishment and sanction enforcement in a social dilemma experiment. Econ. Theory 33, 145–167 (2007)

  19. 19.

    & Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethol. Sociobiol. 13, 171–195 (1992)

  20. 20.

    & Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373, 209–216 (1995)

  21. 21.

    , & Reward and punishment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10757–10762 (2001)

  22. 22.

    , , & The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 3531–3535 (2003)

  23. 23.

    Altruistic punishment and the origin of cooperation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7047–7049 (2005)

  24. 24.

    in Advances in Economic Theory: Sixth World Congress (ed. Laffont, J. J.) 89–131 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993)

  25. 25.

    Cooperation under the shadow of the future: experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. Am. Econ. Rev. 95, 1591–1604 (2005)

  26. 26.

    The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968)

  27. 27.

    , & The effect of rewards and sanctions in provision of public goods (Economics CAEPR Working Paper no. 2006–005, Indiana Univ. Bloomington, 2006)

  28. 28.

    , & They come to play: supply effects in an economic experiment (Economics Discussion Paper no. 06–02, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT, 2006)

  29. 29.

    Economic theory and experimental economics. J. Econ. Lit. 43, 65–107 (2005)

  30. 30.

    z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp. Econ. 10, 171–178 (2007)

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support from the John Templeton Foundation, the National Science Foundation (NSF)–National Institutes of Health joint program in mathematical biology, the Jan Wallander Foundation (A.D.) and an NSF grant (D.F.) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics is sponsored by J. Epstein.

Author information

Author notes

    • Anna Dreber
    •  & David G. Rand

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Program for Evolutionary Dynamics,

    • Anna Dreber
    • , David G. Rand
    •  & Martin A. Nowak
  2. Department of Systems Biology,

    • David G. Rand
  3. Department of Economics,

    • Drew Fudenberg
  4. Department of Mathematics, and,

    • Martin A. Nowak
  5. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

    • Martin A. Nowak
  6. Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, 11358 Stockholm, Sweden

    • Anna Dreber

Authors

  1. Search for Anna Dreber in:

  2. Search for David G. Rand in:

  3. Search for Drew Fudenberg in:

  4. Search for Martin A. Nowak in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Nowak.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    The file contains Supplementary Figures S1-S6 and Supplementary Data, and Supplementary Notes with experimental instructions.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06723

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.