Magnani et al. reply


Replying to: A. De Schrijver et al. Nature 451, 10.1038/nature06578; W. de Vries et al. Nature 451, 10.1038/nature06579 (2008)

Nitrogen (N) deposition alters ecosystem function in several ways, with important effects on N leaching and water quality, as well as on interspecific competition and biodiversity. These changes have been attributed to ecosystem N saturation, defined as the alleviation of N limitations on rates of biological function1. After an initial fertilization effect, N saturation has also been suggested to reduce plant function and growth2, eventually leading to forest dieback. Although our observation of a substantial positive effect of N deposition on forest carbon (C) sequestration3 does not imply the absence of nitrate losses or other negative effects, as rightly stressed by De Schrijver et al.4, the sustained response observed demonstrates that the fear of a generalized forest decline in response to N fertilization could be overstated, at least within the rather broad N deposition range explored in our analysis. The nature of the observed response of forest C sequestration to N deposition, however, has been questioned outright by de Vries et al.5, who suggested that it could be an artefact resulting from the covariation between N deposition and other environmental variables. The arguments proposed against an overwhelming N effect, however, do not seem to stand up to close scrutiny.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Aber, J. D. et al. Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 48, 921–934 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Aber, J. D. et al. Is nitrogen deposition altering the nitrogen status of northeastern forests? Bioscience 53, 375–389 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Magnani, F. et al. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of established temperate and boreal forests. Nature 447, 848–850 (2007)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    De Schrijver, A. et al. Nitrogen saturation and net ecosystem production. Nature 451 10.1038/nature06578 (2008)

  5. 5

    de Vries, W. et al. Ecologically implausible carbon response? Nature 451 10.1038/nature06579 (2008)

  6. 6

    Spiecker, H. Overview of recent growth trends in European forests. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 116, 33–46 (1999)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Bowden, R. D., Davidson, E., Savage, K., Arabia, C. & Steudler, P. Chronic nitrogen additions reduce total soil respiration and microbial respiration in temperate forest soils at the Harvard Forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 196, 43–56 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Olsson, P., Linder, S., Giesler, R. & Högberg, P. Fertilization of boreal forest reduces both autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1745–1753 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Schulze, E.-D. Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in European Forest Ecosystems (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Dentener, F. et al. Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales. A multimodel evaluation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 20, GB4003 (2006)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Litton, C. M., Raich, J. W. & Ryan, M. G. Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2089–2109 (2007)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Hyvönen, R. et al. Impact of long-term nitrogen addition on carbon stocks in trees and soils in northern Europe. Biogeochemistry 10–1007/s10533-007-9121-3 (2007)

  13. 13

    Sievering, H. Nitrogen deposition and carbon sequestration. Nature 400, 629–630 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Sievering, H., Tomaszewski, T. & Torizzo, J. Canopy uptake of atmospheric N deposition at a conifer forest. Part I—Canopy N budget, photosynthetic efficiency and net ecosystem exchange. Tellus 59B, 483–492 (2007)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Gaige, E. et al. Changes in canopy processes following whole-forest canopy nitrogen fertilization of a mature spruce-hemlock forest. Ecosystems 10, 1133–1147 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnani, F., Mencuccini, M., Borghetti, M. et al. Magnani et al. reply. Nature 451, E3–E4 (2008).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.