Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance


Changes in climate, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and fire regimes have been occurring for decades in the global boreal forest1,2,3, with future climate change likely to increase fire frequency4—the primary disturbance agent in most boreal forests3,5. Previous attempts to assess quantitatively the effect of changing environmental conditions on the net boreal forest carbon balance have not taken into account the competition between different vegetation types on a large scale6,7,8,9. Here we use a process model with three competing vascular and non-vascular vegetation types to examine the effects of climate, carbon dioxide concentrations and fire disturbance on net biome production, net primary production and vegetation dominance in 100 Mha of Canadian boreal forest. We find that the carbon balance of this region was driven by changes in fire disturbance from 1948 to 2005. Climate changes affected the variability, but not the mean, of the landscape carbon balance, with precipitation exerting a more significant effect than temperature. We show that more frequent and larger fires in the late twentieth century resulted in deciduous trees and mosses increasing production at the expense of coniferous trees. Our model did not however exhibit the increases in total forest net primary production that have been inferred from satellite data1,10. We find that poor soil drainage decreased the variability of the landscape carbon balance, which suggests that increased climate and hydrological changes have the potential to affect disproportionately the carbon dynamics of these areas. Overall, we conclude that direct ecophysiological changes resulting from global climate change have not yet been felt in this large boreal region. Variations in the landscape carbon balance and vegetation dominance have so far been driven largely by increases in fire frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Difference in net biome production (NBP) between simulation scenarios, over length of simulation.
Figure 2: Temporal and spatial distribution of simulated net primary production (NPP).
Figure 3: Comparison of model output with observed data from a variety of studies.


  1. Goetz, S. J. et al. Satellite-observed photosynthetic trends across boreal North America associated with climate and fire disturbance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13521–13525 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gillett, N. P. et al. Detecting the effect of climate change on Canadian forest fires. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 L18211 doi: 10.1029/2004GL020876 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stocks, B. J. et al. Large forest fires in Canada, 1959–1997. J. Geophys. Res. 108 8149 doi: 10.1029/2001JD000484 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Watson, R. T. et al. The Regional Impacts of Climate Change. An Assessment of Vulnerability (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zimov, S. A. et al. Contribution of disturbance to increasing seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO2 . Science 284, 1973–1976 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Balshi, M. S. et al. Role of historical fire disturbance in the carbon dynamics of the pan-boreal region: a process-based analysis. J. Geophys. Res. 112 G02029 doi: 10.1029/2006JG000380 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng, C. & Apps, M. J. Modelling the response of net primary productivity (NPP) of boreal forest ecosystems to changes in climate and fire disturbance regimes. Ecol. Modell. 122, 175–193 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang, S., Kimball, J. S. & Running, S. W. Simulating effects of fire disturbance and climate change on boreal forest productivity and evapotranspiration. Sci. Tot. Environ. 362, 85–102 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kasischke, E. S., Christensen, N. L. J. & Stocks, B. J. Fire, global warming, and the carbon balance of boreal forests. Ecol. Appl. 5, 437–451 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nemani, R. R. et al. Climate-drive increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 300, 1560–1563 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Running, S. W. & Coughlan, J. C. A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. I. Hydrological balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes. Ecol. Modell. 42, 125–154 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bond-Lamberty, B. et al. Reimplementation of the BIOME-BGC model to simulate successional change. Tree Physiol. 25, 413–424 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chapin, F. S. et al. Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods. Ecosystems 9, 1041–1050 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Running, S. W. & Gower, S. T. FOREST-BGC, A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. II. Dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. Tree Physiol. 9, 147–160 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bond-Lamberty, B., Gower, S. T. & Ahl, D. E. Improved simulation of poorly drained forests using Biome-BGC. Tree Physiol. 27, 703–715 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bond-Lamberty, B. et al. Simulation of boreal black spruce chronosequences: comparison to field measurements and model evaluation. J. Geophys. Res. 111 G02014 doi: 10.1029/2005JG000123 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Amthor, J. S. et al. Boreal forest CO2 exchange and evapotranspiration predicted by nine ecosystem process models: Intermodal comparisons and relationships to field measurements. J. Geophys. Res. D 106, 33623–33648 (2001)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurz, W. A. & Apps, M. J. A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector. Ecol. Appl. 9, 526–547 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, Z. et al. Temporal changes of forest net primary production and net ecosystem production in west central Canada associated with natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Can. J. For. Res. 33, 2340–2351 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amiro, B. D. et al. Direct carbon emissions from Canadian forest fires, 1959–1999. Can. J. For. Res. 31, 512–525 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harden, J. W. et al. The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget. Glob. Change Biol. 6 (Suppl. 1). 174–184 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kasischke, E. S. & Bruhwiler, L. P. Emissions of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and methane from boreal forest fires in 1998. J. Geophys. Res. 108 8146 doi: 10.1029/2001JD000461 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harden, J. W. et al. Dynamics of soil carbon during deglaciation of the Laurentide ice sheet. Science 258, 1921–1924 (1992)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Deng, F. et al. Global monthly CO2 flux inversion with a focus over North America. Tellus B 59, 179–190 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hicke, J. A. et al. Satellite-derived increases in net primary productivity across North America, 1982–1998. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29 1427 doi: 10.1029/2001GL013578 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou, L. et al. Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981 to 1999. J. Geophys. Res. D 106, 20069–20083 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hicke, J. A. et al. Postfire response of North American boreal forest net primary productivity analyzed with satellite observations. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 1145–1157 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Litvak, M. et al. Effect of stand age on whole ecosystem CO2 exchange in the Canadian boreal forest. J. Geophys. Res. D 108 8225 doi: 10.1029/2001JD000854 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Flannigan, M. D. & Van Wagner, C. E. Climate change and wildfire in Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 21, 66–72 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2006)

Download references


This research was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration and National Science Foundation (Integrated Research Challenges in Environmental Biology) grants to S.T.G. Biome-BGC version 4.1.2 was provided by the Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG) at the University of Montana; NTSG assumes no responsibility for the proper use of Biome-BGC by others. This study would not have been possible without the assistance of D. Luke.

Author Contributions S.T.G., B.B.-L. and D.E.A. designed the experiment. S.D.P. and D.E.A. assembled input data, and B.B.-L. and S.D.P. wrote code, ran the model, and analysed output data. B.B.-L. administered the experiment and wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Bond-Lamberty.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Figures S1-S2, Supplementary Table S1 and additional references. This document gives a full map of the study area, maps of input data, a table summarizing meteorological input data used, and references to studies appearing in Figure 3 of the main text. (PDF 2103 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bond-Lamberty, B., Peckham, S., Ahl, D. et al. Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance. Nature 450, 89–92 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing