Letter | Published:

Radio-frequency scanning tunnelling microscopy

Nature volume 450, pages 8588 (01 November 2007) | Download Citation

Abstract

The scanning tunnelling microscope (STM)1 relies on localized electron tunnelling between a sharp probe tip and a conducting sample to attain atomic-scale spatial resolution. In the 25-year period since its invention, the STM has helped uncover a wealth of phenomena in diverse physical systems—ranging from semiconductors2,3 to superconductors4 to atomic and molecular nanosystems5,6,7,8,9. A severe limitation in scanning tunnelling microscopy is the low temporal resolution, originating from the diminished high-frequency response of the tunnel current readout circuitry. Here we overcome this limitation by measuring the reflection from a resonant inductor–capacitor circuit in which the tunnel junction is embedded, and demonstrate electronic bandwidths as high as 10 MHz. This 100-fold bandwidth improvement on the state of the art translates into fast surface topography as well as delicate measurements in mesoscopic electronics and mechanics. Broadband noise measurements across the tunnel junction using this radio-frequency STM have allowed us to perform thermometry at the nanometre scale. Furthermore, we have detected high-frequency mechanical motion with a sensitivity approaching 15 fm Hz-1/2. This sensitivity is on par with the highest available from nanoscale optical and electrical displacement detection techniques, and the radio-frequency STM is expected to be capable of quantum-limited position measurements.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Surface studies by scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 57–61 (1982)

  2. 2.

    , & Electronic structure of the Si(111)2 × 1 surface by scanning-tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2579–2582 (1986)

  3. 3.

    & Atom-resolved surface chemistry using scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1049–1052 (1988)

  4. 4.

    et al. Imaging the effects of individual zinc impurity atoms on superconductivity in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Nature 403, 746–750 (2000)

  5. 5.

    & Positioning single atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope. Nature 344, 524–526 (1990)

  6. 6.

    , , & Manipulation of adsorbed atoms and creation of new structures on room-temperature surfaces with a scanning tunneling microscope. Science 251, 1206–1210 (1991)

  7. 7.

    , & Quantum mirages formed by coherent projection of electronic structure. Nature 403, 512–515 (2000)

  8. 8.

    et al. Mapping the one-dimensional electronic states of nanotube peapod structures. Science 295, 828–831 (2002)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Tunneling into a single magnetic atom: spectroscopic evidence of the Kondo resonance. Science 280, 567–569 (1998)

  10. 10.

    , , & Direct observation of the precession of individual parametric spins on oxidized silicon surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2531–2534 (1989)

  11. 11.

    & Electronic spin detection in molecules using scanning-tunneling-microscopy-assisted electron spin resonance. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 458–460 (2002)

  12. 12.

    , , & High-speed scanning tunneling microscopy: Principles and applications. J. Appl. Phys. 75, 161–168 (1994)

  13. 13.

    et al. Scanning probe microscopes go video rate and beyond. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 053710 (2005)

  14. 14.

    & Picosecond resolution in scanning tunneling microscopy. Science 262, 1029–1032 (1993)

  15. 15.

    , , , & Ultrafast scanning probe microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2567–2569 (1993)

  16. 16.

    , , , & The radio-frequency single-electron transistor (RF-SET): A fast and ultrasensitive electrometer. Science 280, 1238–1242 (1998)

  17. 17.

    , & Intrinsic noise properties of atomic point contact displacement detectors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 096804 (2007)

  18. 18.

    , , , & Efficient and sensitive capacitive readout of nanomechanical resonator arrays. Nano Lett. 7, 120–126 (2007)

  19. 19.

    & Gap dependence of the tip-sample capacitance. J. Appl. Phys. 83, 7416–7423 (1998)

  20. 20.

    , , , & Observation of atomic corrugation on Au(111) by scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2879–2882 (1987)

  21. 21.

    , & Shot-noise suppression in the single-electron tunneling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1610–1613 (1995)

  22. 22.

    , , & Primary electronic thermometry using the shot noise of a tunnel junction. Science 300, 1929–1932 (2003)

  23. 23.

    , & Thermal imaging using the atomic force microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 2501–2503 (1993)

  24. 24.

    , & Atomic force microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930–933 (1986)

  25. 25.

    & Momentum noise in vacuum tunneling transducers. Phys. Rev. B 41, 8184–8194 (1990)

  26. 26.

    , & Uncertainty-principle noise in vacuum-tunneling transducers. Phys. Rev. B 45, 3735–3743 (1992)

  27. 27.

    & Shot noise of a tunnel junction displacement detector. Phys. Rev. B 70, 121303 (2004)

  28. 28.

    , & Integrated micro-scanning tunneling microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2305–2307 (1995)

  29. 29.

    , , & Detection of doubled shot noise in short normal-metal/ superconductor junctions. Nature 405, 50–53 (2000)

  30. 30.

    et al. Cooling a nanomechanical resonator with quantum back-action. Nature 443, 193–197 (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. M. Karabacak for help with optical interferometry and A. Vandelay for discussions. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through the Division of Materials Research (IMR Programme), the Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (MDSE Programme) and the Cornell Center for Materials Research.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics,

    • U. Kemiktarak
  2. Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA

    • K. L. Ekinci
  3. Department of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

    • T. Ndukum
    •  & K. C. Schwab

Authors

  1. Search for U. Kemiktarak in:

  2. Search for T. Ndukum in:

  3. Search for K. C. Schwab in:

  4. Search for K. L. Ekinci in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. L. Ekinci.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Figures S1-S2 with Legends, Supplementary Table S1 and additional references. Supplementary Figure S1 shows the effective temperature calculation. Supplementary Figure S2 shows SEM and STM images of the membranes used. Supplementary Table S1 lists the experimentally extracted tunnel junction decay constant.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06238

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.