Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception


Human olfactory perception differs enormously between individuals, with large reported perceptual variations in the intensity and pleasantness of a given odour. For instance, androstenone (5α-androst-16-en-3-one), an odorous steroid derived from testosterone, is variously perceived by different individuals as offensive (“sweaty, urinous”), pleasant (“sweet, floral”) or odourless1,2,3. Similar variation in odour perception has been observed for several other odours4,5,6. The mechanistic basis of variation in odour perception between individuals is unknown. We investigated whether genetic variation in human odorant receptor genes accounts in part for variation in odour perception between individuals7,8. Here we show that a human odorant receptor, OR7D4, is selectively activated in vitro by androstenone and the related odorous steroid androstadienone (androsta-4,16-dien-3-one) and does not respond to a panel of 64 other odours and two solvents. A common variant of this receptor (OR7D4 WM) contains two non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), resulting in two amino acid substitutions (R88W, T133M; hence ‘RT’) that severely impair function in vitro. Human subjects with RT/WM or WM/WM genotypes as a group were less sensitive to androstenone and androstadienone and found both odours less unpleasant than the RT/RT group. Genotypic variation in OR7D4 accounts for a significant proportion of the valence (pleasantness or unpleasantness) and intensity variance in perception of these steroidal odours. Our results demonstrate the first link between the function of a human odorant receptor in vitro and odour perception.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: OR7D4 is selectively activated by androstenone and androstadienone.
Figure 2: Functional characterization of OR7D4 polymorphisms.
Figure 3: OR7D4 variation affects androstenone and androstadienone intensity perception.
Figure 4: OR7D4 variation affects androstenone and androstadienone quality perception.


  1. 1

    Wysocki, C. J. & Beauchamp, G. K. Ability to smell androstenone is genetically determined. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 4899–4902 (1984)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Gower, D. B., Nixon, A. & Mallet, A. I. in Perfumery (eds Van Toller, S. & Dodd, G. H.) 47–75 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Bremner, E. A., Mainland, J. D., Khan, R. M. & Sobel, N. The prevalence of androstenone anosmia. Chem. Senses 28, 423–432 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Guillot, M. Physiologie des sensations—anosmies partielles et odeurs fondamentales. C.R. Hebd. Acad. Sci. 226, 1307–1309 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Gilbert, A. N. & Kemp, S. E. Odor perception phenotypes: multiple, specific hyperosmias to musks. Chem. Senses 21, 411–416 (1996)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Whissell-Buechy, D. & Amoore, J. E. Odour-blindness to musk: simple recessive inheritance. Nature 242, 271–273 (1973)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Menashe, I., Man, O., Lancet, D. & Gilad, Y. Different noses for different people. Nature Genet. 34, 143–144 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Gilad, Y. & Lancet, D. Population differences in the human functional olfactory repertoire. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 307–314 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Saito, H., Kubota, M., Roberts, R. W., Chi, Q. & Matsunami, H. RTP family members induce functional expression of mammalian odorant receptors. Cell 119, 679–691 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Keller, A. & Vosshall, L. B. Human olfactory psychophysics. Curr. Biol. 14, R875–R878 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Stevens, D. A. & O’Connell, R. J. Enhanced sensitivity to androstenone following regular exposure to pemenone. Chem. Senses 20, 413–419 (1995)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Zhuang, H. & Matsunami, H. Synergism of accessory factors in functional expression of mammalian odorant receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 15284–15293 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Zhang, X. et al. Characterizing the expression of the human olfactory receptor gene family using a novel DNA microarray. Genome Biol. 8, R86 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Doty, R. L., McKeown, D. A., Lee, W. W. & Shaman, P. A study of the test–retest reliability of ten olfactory tests. Chem. Senses 20, 645–656 (1995)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Doty, R. L. & Laing, D. G. in Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation (ed. Doty, R. L.) 203–228 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Dravnieks, A. Odor quality: semantically generated multidimensional profiles are stable. Science 218, 799–801 (1982)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Cleveland, W. S. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 829–836 (1979)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T. & Buck, L. B. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell 96, 713–723 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Wysocki, C. J., Dorries, K. M. & Beauchamp, G. K. Ability to perceive androstenone can be acquired by ostensibly anosmic people. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 7976–7978 (1989)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Dorries, K. M., Schmidt, H. J., Beauchamp, G. K. & Wysocki, C. J. Changes in sensitivity to the odor of androstenone during adolescence. Dev. Psychobiol. 22, 423–435 (1989)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Dalton, P., Doolittle, N. & Breslin, P. A. Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nature Neurosci. 5, 199–200 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Mainland, J. D. et al. One nostril knows what the other learns. Nature 419, 802 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Wang, L., Chen, L. & Jacob, T. Evidence for peripheral plasticity in human odour response. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 554, 236–244 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Jacob, S., Kinnunen, L. H., Metz, J., Cooper, M. & McClintock, M. K. Sustained human chemosignal unconsciously alters brain function. Neuroreport 12, 2391–2394 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Wyart, C. et al. Smelling a single component of male sweat alters levels of cortisol in women. J. Neurosci. 27, 1261–1265 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Krautwurst, D., Yau, K. W. & Reed, R. R. Identification of ligands for olfactory receptors by functional expression of a receptor library. Cell 95, 917–926 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Laird, D. W. & Molday, R. S. Evidence against the role of rhodopsin in rod outer segment binding to RPE cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 29, 419–428 (1988)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Keller, A. & Vosshall, L. B. A psychophysical test of the vibration theory of olfaction. Nature Neurosci. 7, 337–338 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


L.B.V. and A.K. thank E. Gotschlich, B. Coller, A. N. Gilbert, I. Gomez, P. Hempstead and C. Vancil; H.M. and H.Z. thank H. Amrein, M. Cook, M. Kubota, D. Marchuk, R. Molday, D. Tracey and R. Valdivia. This research was supported in part by an NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award to Rockefeller University and by grants to L.B.V. from the Irma T. Hirschl Trust, to H.M. from the NIH, to H.Z. from an NIH National Research Service Award, and to A.K. from a Marco S. Stoffel Fellowship.

Author Contributions H.Z. and H.M. screened for androstenone receptors, identified polymorphisms, performed functional expression of receptor variants, and genotyped the human subjects with assistance from Q.C. A.K. and L.B.V. devised the human olfactory psychophysics study, for which A.K. supervised data collection and analysis.

The sequences of the human OR7D4 variants are deposited in Genbank under accession numbers EU049291–EU049294.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Leslie B. Vosshall or Hiroaki Matsunami.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.K., H.Z., Q.C., L.B.V. and H.M. filed a patent application relevant to this work on 8 May 2007.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Methods with additional references, Supplementary Figures S1-S10 with Legends and Supplementary Tables S1-S6. (PDF 9302 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, A., Zhuang, H., Chi, Q. et al. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature 449, 468–472 (2007).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing