Article | Published:

Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch

Nature volume 449, pages 677681 (11 October 2007) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

How gene duplication and divergence contribute to genetic novelty and adaptation has been of intense interest, but experimental evidence has been limited. The genetic switch controlling the yeast galactose use pathway includes two paralogous genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encode a co-inducer (GAL3) and a galactokinase (GAL1). These paralogues arose from a single bifunctional ancestral gene as is still present in Kluyveromyces lactis. To determine which evolutionary processes shaped the evolution of the two paralogues, here we assess the effects of precise replacement of coding and non-coding sequences on organismal fitness. We suggest that duplication of the ancestral bifunctional gene allowed for the resolution of an adaptive conflict between the transcriptional regulation of the two gene functions. After duplication, previously disfavoured binding site configurations evolved that divided the regulation of the ancestral gene into two specialized genes, one of which ultimately became one of the most tightly regulated genes in the genome.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer, New York, 1970)

  2. 2.

    & Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 615–643 (2004)

  3. 3.

    , & Evolutionary genetics of ruminant lysozymes. Anim. Genet. 23, 193–202 (1992)

  4. 4.

    Molecular evolution of color vision in vertebrates. Gene 300, 69–78 (2002)

  5. 5.

    , & Adaptive evolution of a duplicated pancreatic ribonuclease gene in a leaf-eating monkey. Nature Genet. 30, 411–415 (2002)

  6. 6.

    & Splitting pairs: the diverging fates of duplicated genes. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 827–837 (2002)

  7. 7.

    Conserved functions of yeast genes support the duplication, degeneration and complementation model for gene duplication. Genetics 171, 1455–1461 (2005)

  8. 8.

    , , , & Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440, 341–345 (2006)

  9. 9.

    et al. Evolution of mitochondrial chaperones utilized in Fe–S cluster biogenesis. Curr. Biol. 16, 1660–1665 (2006)

  10. 10.

    Gene Sharing and Evolution: The Diversity of Protein Functions (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2007)

  11. 11.

    et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531–1545 (1999)

  12. 12.

    , , & Evolution of cis elements in the differential expression of two Hoxa2 coparalogous genes in pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5419–5424 (2006)

  13. 13.

    & The recruitment of crystallins: new functions precede gene duplication. Science 252, 1078–1079 (1991)

  14. 14.

    The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc. Biol. Sci. 256, 119–124 (1994)

  15. 15.

    Adaptive Evolution of Genes and Genomes (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999)

  16. 16.

    A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 51, 458–476 (1987)

  17. 17.

    & Transcriptional control of the GAL/MEL regulon of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mechanism of galactose-mediated signal transduction. Mol. Microbiol. 40, 1059–1066 (2001)

  18. 18.

    & Genes and Signals (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Woodbury, New York, 2001)

  19. 19.

    & Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387, 708–713 (1997)

  20. 20.

    et al. The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science 304, 304–307 (2004)

  21. 21.

    , & Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428, 617–624 (2004)

  22. 22.

    , & Parallel inactivation of multiple GAL pathway genes and ecological diversification in yeasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14144–14149 (2004)

  23. 23.

    et al. Independent sorting-out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole-genome duplication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8397–8402 (2007)

  24. 24.

    & Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 1440–1448 (1984)

  25. 25.

    , & Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1GAL10 divergent promoter region: location and function of the upstream activating sequence UASG. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 2467–2478 (1984)

  26. 26.

    , & Yeast regulatory gene GAL3: carbon regulation; UASGal elements in common with GAL1, GAL2, GAL7, GAL10, GAL80, and MEL1; encoded protein strikingly similar to yeast and Escherichia coli galactokinases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 3439–3447 (1988)

  27. 27.

    et al. Activation of Gal4p by galactose-dependent interaction of galactokinase and Gal80p. Science 272, 1662–1665 (1996)

  28. 28.

    & Galactose-dependent reversible interaction of Gal3p with Gal80p in the induction pathway of Gal4p-activated genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1721–1726 (1997)

  29. 29.

    & The yeast galactose genetic switch is mediated by the formation of a Gal4p-Gal80p-Gal3p complex. EMBO J. 17, 4086–4091 (1998)

  30. 30.

    & Gene activation by interaction of an inhibitor with a cytoplasmic signaling protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8548–8553 (2002)

  31. 31.

    , & Galactokinase encoded by GAL1 is a bifunctional protein required for induction of the GAL genes in Kluyveromyces lactis and is able to suppress the gal3 phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 5454–5461 (1991)

  32. 32.

    A comparative analysis of the GAL genetic switch between not-so-distant cousins: Saccharomyces cerevisiae versus Kluyveromyces lactis. FEMS Yeast Res. 5, 1115–1128 (2005)

  33. 33.

    & The organization and transcription of the galactose gene cluster of Kluyveromyces lactis. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 8011–8028 (1988)

  34. 34.

    , , , & Molecular structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gal1p, a bifunctional galactokinase and transcriptional inducer. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 36905–36911 (2005)

  35. 35.

    , , & The insertion of two amino acids into a transcriptional inducer converts it into a galactokinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3154–3159 (2000)

  36. 36.

    , & Perspective: sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 59, 1165–1174 (2005)

  37. 37.

    , , , & Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241–254 (2003)

  38. 38.

    & Gal80–Gal80 interaction on adjacent Gal4p binding sites is required for complete GAL gene repression. EMBO J. 20, 841–851 (2001)

  39. 39.

    Asymmetric functional divergence of duplicate genes in yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1760–1768 (2002)

  40. 40.

    & Divergence in the spatial pattern of gene expression between human duplicate genes. Genome Res. 13, 1638–1645 (2003)

  41. 41.

    , , & Duplicate genes increase gene expression diversity within and between species. Nature Genet. 36, 577–579 (2004)

  42. 42.

    & Divergence of spatial gene expression profiles following species-specific gene duplications in human and mouse. Genome Res. 14, 1870–1879 (2004)

  43. 43.

    , & Expression divergence between duplicate genes. Trends Genet. 21, 602–607 (2005)

  44. 44.

    , & Darwinian evolution in the genealogy of haemoglobin. Nature 253, 603–608 (1975)

  45. 45.

    , , , & Positive cross-regulation and enhancer sharing: two mechanisms for specifying overlapping Hox expression patterns. Genes Dev. 11, 900–913 (1997)

  46. 46.

    , , & A computational analysis of whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene expression. Nature Genet. 26, 183–186 (2000)

  47. 47.

    & in Principles of Population Genetics 216 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1997)

  48. 48.

    et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14, 115–132 (1998)

  49. 49.

    , & Efficient gene targeting in Kluyveromyces lactis. Yeast 21, 781–792 (2004)

  50. 50.

    , , , & A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2519–2524 (1996)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. L. Williams for sharing unpublished data, reagents and the competition assay; J. E. Selegue for technical support; M. Johnston and Washington University in St Louis for access to laboratory space and equipment; Collection de Levures d'Intérêt Biotechnologique for K. lactis strain CLIB210; H. Y. Steensma for the NHEJ-deficient K. lactis strain and transformation protocol; J. H. Hegemann for the kanMX cassette; B. L. Williams, P. M. van Wynsberghe and Carroll laboratory members for technical advice; L. M. Olds for artwork; and B. L. Williams, B. Prud’homme and M. Johnston for critical reading of the manuscript. The Howard Hughes Medical Institute supported this work through an investigatorship (S.B.C.) and predoctoral fellowship (C.T.H.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Chris Todd Hittinger

    Present address: Center for Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA.

Affiliations

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

    • Chris Todd Hittinger
    •  & Sean B. Carroll

Authors

  1. Search for Chris Todd Hittinger in:

  2. Search for Sean B. Carroll in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean B. Carroll.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    The file contains Supplementary Discussion of Supplementary Tables S1-S4, Supplementary Tables S1-S4, Supplementary Figure S1 with Legend and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06151

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.