Abstract

Recent advances in understanding insect communities in tropical forests1,2 have contributed little to our knowledge of large-scale patterns of insect diversity, because incomplete taxonomic knowledge of many tropical species hinders the mapping of their distribution records3. This impedes an understanding of global biodiversity patterns and explains why tropical insects are under-represented in conservation biology. Our study of approximately 500 species from three herbivorous guilds feeding on foliage (caterpillars, Lepidoptera), wood (ambrosia beetles, Coleoptera) and fruit (fruitflies, Diptera) found a low rate of change in species composition (beta diversity) across 75,000 square kilometres of contiguous lowland rainforest in Papua New Guinea, as most species were widely distributed. For caterpillars feeding on large plant genera, most species fed on multiple host species, so that even locally restricted plant species did not support endemic herbivores. Large plant genera represented a continuously distributed resource easily colonized by moths and butterflies over hundreds of kilometres. Low beta diversity was also documented in groups with differing host specificity (fruitflies and ambrosia beetles), suggesting that dispersal limitation does not have a substantial role in shaping the distribution of insect species in New Guinea lowland rainforests. Similar patterns of low beta diversity can be expected in other tropical lowland rainforests, as they are typically situated in the extensive low basins of major tropical rivers similar to the Sepik–Ramu region of New Guinea studied here.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Host specificity of insect herbivores in tropical forests. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1083–1090 (2005)

  2. 2.

    , & Insects on plants: diversity of herbivore assemblages revisited. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 597–620 (2005)

  3. 3.

    & From communities to continents: beta-diversity of herbivorous insects. Annal. Zool. Fenn. 42, 463–475 (2005)

  4. 4.

    , , , & Host specialization and species richness of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a New Guinea rain forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 21, 67–77 (2005)

  5. 5.

    & How many species of pimplines (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) are there in Costa Rica? J. Trop. Ecol. 9, 491–499 (1993)

  6. 6.

    & Temporal and spatial patterns of butterfly diversity in a lowland tropical rainforest. In Tropical Rainforest Research — Current Issues (eds Edwards, D. S., Booth W. E. & Choy, S.) 125–138 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996)

  7. 7.

    The biodiversity question: How many species of terrestrial arthropods are there? In Forest Canopies 2nd edn (eds Lowman, M. D. & Rinker, H. B.) 259–269 (Elsevier, Burlington, 2004)

  8. 8.

    , , & Two biases in estimating range sizes of Amazonian plant species. J. Trop. Ecol. 18, 935–942 (2002)

  9. 9.

    Host specificity, alpha- and beta-diversity of phytophagous beetles in two tropical forests in Panama. Biodivers. Conserv. 15, 83–105 (2006)

  10. 10.

    & Beta-diversity of geometrid moths from northern Borneo: effects of habitat, time and space. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 230–237 (2007)

  11. 11.

    Geologic, evolutionary, and ecological bases of the diversification of Neotropical butterflies. In Tropical Rainforests. Past, Present, and Future (eds Bermingham, E., Dick, C. W. & Moritz, C.) 166–201 (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005)

  12. 12.

    et al. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394, 472–474 (1998)

  13. 13.

    , & Studies on New Guinea moths. 1. Introduction (Lepidoptera). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 105, 1035–1043 (2003)

  14. 14.

    et al. Local species richness of leaf-chewing insects feeding on woody plants from one hectare of a lowland rainforest. Cons. Biol. 18, 227–237 (2004)

  15. 15.

    et al. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295, 666–669 (2002)

  16. 16.

    The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2001)

  17. 17.

    et al. Riverine barriers and the geographic distribution of Amazonian species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13672–13677 (2000)

  18. 18.

    & The phylogeography of Amazonia revisited: New evidence from riodinid butterflies. Evolution 56, 1489–1497 (2002)

  19. 19.

    Species Diversity in Space and Time (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995)

  20. 20.

    , & Are there latitudinal gradients in species turnover? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 483–498 (2003)

  21. 21.

    Plants of New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Dictionary of the Genera and Families of Flowering Plants and Ferns, Handbook no. 13. (Wau Ecology Institute, Wau, 1992)

  22. 22.

    et al. Response to comment on “Why are there so many species of herbivorous insects in tropical rainforests?”. Science 315, 1666 (2007)

  23. 23.

    How many species of arthropods? Erwin’s estimate revised. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71, 583–597 (2000)

  24. 24.

    et al. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416, 841–844 (2002)

  25. 25.

    How many species are there? Biodiv.. Cons. 2, 215–232 (1993)

  26. 26.

    et al. An altitudinal comparison of caterpillar (Lepidoptera) assemblages on Ficus trees in Papua New Guinea. J. Biogeogr. 32, 1303–1314 (2005)

  27. 27.

    , & Global distribution of species diversity in vascular plants: towards a world map of phytodiversity. Erdkunde 50, 317–327 (1996)

  28. 28.

    et al. Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10309–10313 (2003)

  29. 29.

    , , & Tree species distributions in an upper Amazonian forest. Ecology 80, 2651–2661 (1999)

  30. 30.

    , , & A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol. Lett. 8, 148–159 (2005)

  31. 31.

    & The Middle Sepik Plains, New Guinea: A physiographic study. Geogr. Rev. 54, 20–44 (1964)

  32. 32.

    & Language Atlas of the Pacific Area (Australian Academy of the Humanities, Canberra, 1981)

  33. 33.

    & Size distribution of conspecific populations: peoples of New Guinea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 947–952 (2000)

  34. 34.

    (ed.) New Guinea Vegetation (Australian National Univ. Press, Canberra, 1976)

  35. 35.

    The soils of New Guinea. In Biogeography and Ecology of New Guinea (ed. Gressitt, J. L.) 73–86 (W. Junk, The Hague, 1982)

  36. 36.

    Dacine fruit flies collected during the dry season in the lowland rainforest of Madang Province, Papua New Guinea (Diptera: Tephritidae). Aust. J. Entomol. 37, 315–318 (1998)

  37. 37.

    et al. Conservation and biological monitoring of tropical forests: the role of parataxonomists. J. Appl. Ecol. 41, 163–174 (2004)

  38. 38.

    et al. Predictably simple: communities of caterpillars (Lepidoptera) feeding on rainforest trees in Papua New Guinea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.. B 269, 2337–2344 (2002)

  39. 39.

    & Terranes and the accretion history of the New Guinea orogen. J. Austral. Geol. Geophys. 10, 193–211 (1987)

  40. 40.

    , , & Terranes of the New Guinea orogen. In Proceedings of the Geology Exploration and Mining Conference, Madang (ed. Hancock, G.) 61–66 (Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, 1997)

  41. 41.

    Neogene tectonic reconstruction of the Adelbert-Finisterre-New Britain collision, northern Papua New Guinea. J. S. E. Asian Earth Sci. 11, 33–51 (1995)

  42. 42.

    Changing shorelines and cultural orientations in the Sepik-Ramu, Papua New Guinea: implications for Pacific prehistory. World Archaeol. 29, 1–14 (1997)

  43. 43.

    & Climate as a dominant control in the biogeography of northern Australia and New Guinea. In Bridge and Barrier: the Natural and Cultural History of Torres Straight (ed. Walker, D.) 61–92 (Australian National University, Canberra, 1972)

  44. 44.

    , & Habitat and successional status of plants in relation to the communities of their leaf-chewing herbivores in Papua New Guinea. J. Ecol. 89, 186–199 (2001)

  45. 45.

    , , , & Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14812–14817 (2004)

  46. 46.

    et al. DNA barcoding confirms polyphagy in a generalist moth, Homona mermerodes (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 549–557 (2007)

  47. 47.

    Insect-fungus relationship in the bark and ambrosia beetles. In Insect-Fungus Interactions (eds Wilding, N., Collins, N. M., Hammond, P. M. & Webber, J. F.) 121–143 (Academic, London, 1989)

  48. 48.

    , , , & The evolution of agriculture in insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36, 563–595 (2005)

  49. 49.

    Host specificity of temperate and tropical animals. Nature 281, 139–141 (1979)

  50. 50.

    et al. The evolution of agriculture in beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae). Evolution 55, 2011–2027 (2001)

  51. 51.

    The tropical fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) of the Australasian and Oceanian regions. Mem. Queensl. Mus. 26, 1–521 (1989)

  52. 52.

    et al. Distribution and biogeography of Bactrocera and Dacus species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Papua New Guinea. Aust. J. Entomol. 43, 148–156 (2004)

  53. 53.

    , & Measuring beta diversity for presence and absence data. J. Anim. Ecol. 72, 367–382 (2003)

  54. 54.

    EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 7. 5 <> (2005)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Bito, W. Boen, A. Borney, L. Cizek, G. Damag, A. Krasa, J. Kua, R. Kutil, R. Lilip, M. Manaono, M. Rimandai, S. Sau, G. Sosanika, D. Stancik, V. Iwam and D. Wal for technical assistance, and V. O. Becker, J. Brown, A. Cognato, L. Craven, K. Damas, C. Drew, J. D. Holloway, M. Horak, K. Maes, J. Miller, E. G. Munroe, M. Shaffer, A. M. Solis, D. Stancik, W. Takeuchi and K. Tuck for taxonomic assistance. More than 150 insect collectors contributed to the study. P. Herbert provided DNA barcodes; J. Leps advised on statistical analysis; R. Condit, H. L. Davies, O. Diserud, J. Chave, M. Heads, J. Hrcek, D. H. Janzen, O. T. Lewis, F. Ødegaard, D. Storch and C. O. Webb commented on the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (USA), Grant Agencies of the Czech Republic, Czech Academy of Sciences and Czech Ministry of Education, Darwin Initiative for the Survival of Species (UK), David and Lucile Packard Fellowship in Science and Engineering, the National Geographic Society (USA), and The International Centre for the Management of Pest Fruit Flies (Griffith University). We thank Papua New Guinean customary landowners for allowing us to work in their forests. We dedicate this work to the late Richard Kutil.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Biology Center of the Czech Academy of Sciences and School of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 31, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

    • Vojtech Novotny
    • , Jiri Hulcr
    •  & Milan Janda
  2. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20013-7012, USA

    • Scott E. Miller
    •  & Karolyn Darrow
  3. Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 243 Natural Science, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA

    • Jiri Hulcr
  4. Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, Queensland 4111, Australia

    • Richard A. I. Drew
  5. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Panama

    • Yves Basset
  6. Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA

    • Gregory P. Setliff
  7. School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK

    • Alan J. A. Stewart
  8. New Guinea Binatang Research Center, PO Box 604, Madang, Papua New Guinea

    • John Auga
    • , Brus Isua
    • , Kenneth Molem
    • , Markus Manumbor
    • , Elvis Tamtiai
    •  & Martin Mogia
  9. Bell Museum of Natural History and Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, 250 Biological Sciences Center, 1445 Gortner Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55108-1095, USA

    • George D. Weiblen

Authors

  1. Search for Vojtech Novotny in:

  2. Search for Scott E. Miller in:

  3. Search for Jiri Hulcr in:

  4. Search for Richard A. I. Drew in:

  5. Search for Yves Basset in:

  6. Search for Milan Janda in:

  7. Search for Gregory P. Setliff in:

  8. Search for Karolyn Darrow in:

  9. Search for Alan J. A. Stewart in:

  10. Search for John Auga in:

  11. Search for Brus Isua in:

  12. Search for Kenneth Molem in:

  13. Search for Markus Manumbor in:

  14. Search for Elvis Tamtiai in:

  15. Search for Martin Mogia in:

  16. Search for George D. Weiblen in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vojtech Novotny.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Results, Supplementary Figures S1-S5 with Legends, Supplementary Tables S1-S3 and Supplementary Appendices S1-S4.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06021

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.