Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks


The interactions between plants and their animal pollinators and seed dispersers have moulded much of Earth’s biodiversity1,2,3. Recently, it has been shown that these mutually beneficial interactions form complex networks with a well-defined architecture that may contribute to biodiversity persistence4,5,6,7,8. Little is known, however, about which ecological and evolutionary processes generate these network patterns3,9. Here we use phylogenetic methods10,11 to show that the phylogenetic relationships of species predict the number of interactions they exhibit in more than one-third of the networks, and the identity of the species with which they interact in about half of the networks. As a consequence of the phylogenetic effects on interaction patterns, simulated extinction events tend to trigger coextinction cascades of related species. This results in a non-random pruning of the evolutionary tree12,13 and a more pronounced loss of taxonomic diversity than expected in the absence of a phylogenetic signal. Our results emphasize how the simultaneous consideration of phylogenetic information and network architecture can contribute to our understanding of the structure and fate of species-rich communities.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: A phylogenetic approach to mutualistic networks.
Figure 2: Magnitude of phylogenetic signal on the number and strength of mutualistic interactions.
Figure 3: Correlation between ecological similarity and phylogenetic relatedness.
Figure 4: Phylogenetic resemblance induces a higher loss of taxonomic diversity after species extinctions.


  1. Ehrlich, P. R. & Raven, P. H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 18, 586–608 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson, J. N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Waser, N. M. & Ollerton, J. Plant–Pollinator Interactions: from Specialization to Generalization (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jordano, P., Bascompte, J. & Olesen, J. M. Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant–animal interactions. Ecol. Lett. 6, 69–81 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J. & Olesen, J. M. The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9383–9387 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Olesen, J. M. Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312, 431–433 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Memmott, J., Waser, N. M. & Price, M. V. Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 2605–2611 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vázquez, D. P. & Aizen, M. A. Asymmetric specialization: a pervasive feature of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology 85, 1251–1257 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson, J. N. Mutualistic webs of species. Science 312, 372–373 (2006)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Freckleton, R. P., Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160, 712–726 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 57, 717–745 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Purvis, A., Agapow, P.-M., Gittleman, J. J. & Mace, G. M. Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science 288, 328–330 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heard, S. B. & Mooers, A. Ø. Phylogenetically patterned speciation rates and extinction risks change the loss of evolutionary history during extinctions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 613–620 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ives, A. R. & Godfray, C. J. Phylogenetic analysis of trophic associations. Am. Nat. 168, E1–E14 (2006)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Armbruster, W. S. Phylogeny and the evolution of plant–animal interactions. Bioscience 42, 12–20 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrera, C. M. Historical effects and sorting processes as explanations for contemporary ecological patterns: character syndromes in Mediterranean woody plants. Am. Nat. 140, 421–446 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jordano, P. Angiosperm fleshy fruits and seed dispersers: a comparative analysis of adaptation and constraints in plant–animal interactions. Am. Nat. 145, 163–191 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M. & Ollerton, J. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77, 1043–1060 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Albert, R., Barabási, A.-L. & Jeong, H. The Internet’s Achilles’ Heel: Error and attack tolerance in complex networks. Nature 406, 378–382 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Montoya, J. M., Pimm, S. L. & Solé, R. V. Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442, 259–264 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wheelwright, N. T. Fruit size in a tropical tree species—variation, preference by birds, and heritability. Vegetatio 108, 163–174 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fenster, C. B., Armbruster, W. S., Wilson, P., Dudash, M. R. & Thompson, J. D. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 375–403 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bronstein, J. L., Alarcón, R. & Geber, M. The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms. New Phytol. 172, 412–428 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cattin, M.-F., Bersier, L.-F., Banasek-Richter, C., Baltensperger, R. & Gabriel, J.-P. Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure. Nature 427, 835–839 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garland, T. A. Bennett, F. & Rezende, E. L. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 3015–3035 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology 2nd edn 254–256 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Clarke, K. R. & Warwick, R. M. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. J. Appl. Ecol. 35, 523–531 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank S. Armbruster, P. Buston, M. A. Fortuna, P. Guimarães, M. Helmus, A. Ives, J. Olesen, D. Posada, A. G. Sáez, J. N. Thompson and N. Waser for comments on a previous draft. This work was funded by the European Heads of Research Councils, the European Science Foundation, and the EC Sixth Framework Programme through a EURYI (European Young Investigator) Award (J.B.), by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (P.J. and J.B.), by the Junta de Andalucía (P.J. and J.B.), and by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (P.R.G).

Author Contributions E.L.R. performed all the analysis and compiled the phylogenies jointly with J.E.L. P.R.G. performed the extinction simulations. P.J. and J.B. designed the study and compiled the interaction matrices. E.L.R. and J.B. wrote a first version of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to the final draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Bascompte.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figures 1-3, additional references and all the phylogenies compiled for this study. (PDF 6238 kb)

Supplementary Data and Methods

This file contains Supplementary Data with the entire database listing (i) interaction matrices used in this study; (ii) species list and their information and (iii) results from statistical analysis summarized in main text and Supplementary Methods. (XLS 6259 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rezende, E., Lavabre, J., Guimarães, P. et al. Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature 448, 925–928 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing