Letter | Published:

Self-cooling of a micromirror by radiation pressure

Subjects

Abstract

Cooling of mechanical resonators is currently a popular topic in many fields of physics including ultra-high precision measurements1, detection of gravitational waves2,3 and the study of the transition between classical and quantum behaviour of a mechanical system4,5,6. Here we report the observation of self-cooling of a micromirror by radiation pressure inside a high-finesse optical cavity. In essence, changes in intensity in a detuned cavity, as caused by the thermal vibration of the mirror, provide the mechanism for entropy flow from the mirror’s oscillatory motion to the low-entropy cavity field2. The crucial coupling between radiation and mechanical motion was made possible by producing free-standing micromirrors of low mass (m ≈ 400 ng), high reflectance (more than 99.6%) and high mechanical quality (Q ≈ 10,000). We observe cooling of the mechanical oscillator by a factor of more than 30; that is, from room temperature to below 10 K. In addition to purely photothermal effects7 we identify radiation pressure as a relevant mechanism responsible for the cooling. In contrast with earlier experiments, our technique does not need any active feedback8,9,10. We expect that improvements of our method will permit cooling ratios beyond 1,000 and will thus possibly enable cooling all the way down to the quantum mechanical ground state of the micromirror.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    LaHaye, M. D., Buu, O., Camarota, B. & Schwab, K. C. Approaching the quantum limit of a nanomechanical resonator. Science 304, 74–77 (2004)

  2. 2

    Braginsky, V. & Vyatchanin, S. P. Low quantum noise tranquilizer for Fabry–Perot interferometer. Phys. Lett. A 293, 228–234 (2002)

  3. 3

    Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory. 〈http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/〉.

  4. 4

    Schwab, K. C. & Roukes, M. L. Putting mechanics into quantum mechanics. Physics Today July. 36–42 (2005)

  5. 5

    Leggett, A. J. Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, R415–R451 (2002)

  6. 6

    Marshall, W., Simon, C., Penrose, R. & Bouwmeester, D. Towards quantum superpositions of a mirror. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 130401 (2003)

  7. 7

    Metzger, C. & Karrai, K. Cavity cooling of a microlever. Nature 432, 1002–1005 (2004)

  8. 8

    Mertz, J. & Heidmann, A. Photon noise reduction by controlled deletion techniques. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 745–752 (1993)

  9. 9

    Cohadon, P., Heidmann, A. & Pinard, M. Cooling of a mirror by radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3174–3177 (1999)

  10. 10

    Bushev, P. et al. Feedback cooling of a single trapped ion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 043003 (2006)

  11. 11

    Caves, C. Quantum-mechanical radiation-pressure fluctuations in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 75–79 (1980)

  12. 12

    Braginsky, V., Strigin, S. & Vyatchanin, S. P. Parametric oscillatory instability in Fabry-Perot interferometer. Phys. Lett. A 287, 331–338 (2001)

  13. 13

    Braginsky, V. B. Quantum Measurements (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995)

  14. 14

    Tucker, R., Baney, D., Sorin, W. & Flory, C. Thermal noise and radiation pressure in MEMS Fabry–Perot tunable filters and lasers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8, 88–97 (2002)

  15. 15

    Vogel, M., Mooser, C., Karrai, K. & Warburton, R. Optically tunable mechanics of microlevers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 1337–1339 (2003)

  16. 16

    Sheard, B., Gray, M., Mow-Lowry, C. & McClelland, D. Observation and characterization of an optical spring. Phys. Rev. A 69, 051801 (2004)

  17. 17

    Dorsel, A., McCullen, J., Meystre, P., Vignes, E. & Walther, H. Optical bistability and mirror confinement induced by radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1550–1553 (1983)

  18. 18

    Rokhsari, H., Kippenberg, T., Carmon, T. & Vahala, K. Radiation-pressure-driven micro-mechanical oscillator. Opt. Express 13, 5293–5301 (2005)

  19. 19

    Kippenberg, T., Rokhsari, H., Carmon, T., Scherer, A. & Vahala, K. Analysis of radiation-pressure induced mechanical oscillation of an optical microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 033901 (2005)

  20. 20

    Giovanetti, V. & Vitali, D. Phase-noise measurement in a cavity with a movable mirror undergoing quantum Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. A 63, 023812 (2001)

  21. 21

    Zhang, J., Peng, K. & Braunstein, S. L. Quantum-state transfer from light to macroscopic oscillators. Phys. Rev. A 68, 013808 (2003)

  22. 22

    Paternostro, M. et al. Reconstructing the dynamics of a movable mirror in a detuned optical cavity. New J. Phys. 8, 107 (2006)

  23. 23

    Jacobs, K., Tittonen, I., Wiseman, H. & Schiller, S. Quantum noise in the position measurement of a cavity mirror undergoing Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. A 60, 538–548 (1999)

  24. 24

    Black, E. D. An introduction to Pound–Drever–Hall laser frequency stabilization. Am. J. Phys. 69, 79–87 (2001)

  25. 25

    Pinard, M., Hadjar, M. Y. & Heidmann, A. Effective mass in quantum effects of radiation pressure. Eur. Phys. J. D 7, 107–116 (1999)

  26. 26

    Pinard, M. et al. Entangling movable mirrors in a double-cavity system. Europhys. Lett. 72, 747–753 (2005)

  27. 27

    Marquardt, F., Harris, J. G. E. & Girvin, S. M. Dynamical multistability induced by radiation pressure in high-finesse micromechanical optical cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 103901 (2006)

  28. 28

    Bose, S., Jacobs, K. & Knight, P. L. Preparation of nonclassical states in cavities with a moving mirror. Phys. Rev. A 56, 4175–4186 (1997)

  29. 29

    Mancini, S. & Tombesi, P. Quantum noise reduction by radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. A 49, 4055–4065 (1994)

  30. 30

    Bäuerle, D. Laser Processing and Chemistry 3rd edn (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Brukner, S. Gröblacher, J. Kofler, T. Jennewein, M. S. Kim, A. Vandaley and D. Vitali for discussion. We acknowledge financial support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), by the City of Vienna, by the Austrian NANO Initiative (MNA) and by the Foundational Questions Institute (FQXi).

Author information

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence to M. Aspelmeyer.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Notes

    This file contains a detailed characterization of the micro-mechanical oscillator and of the optical cavity, together with a description of the methods used. (PDF 443 kb)

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

About this article

Further reading

Figure 1: Sketch of the experimental setup.
Figure 2: Power spectrum of the mechanical mode at two different relative detuning levels Δ of the cavity for an input power of 2 mW.
Figure 4: Self-cooling of the mechanical resonator.
Figure 3: Radiation-pressure-induced damping of mirror dynamics.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.