Letter | Published:

Fishing elevates variability in the abundance of exploited species

Nature volume 443, pages 859862 (19 October 2006) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The separation of the effects of environmental variability from the impacts of fishing has been elusive, but is essential for sound fisheries management1,2,3,4,5,6,7. We distinguish environmental effects from fishing effects by comparing the temporal variability of exploited versus unexploited fish stocks living in the same environments. Using the unique suite of 50-year-long larval fish surveys from the California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations4 we analyse fishing as a treatment effect in a long-term ecological experiment. Here we present evidence from the marine environment that exploited species exhibit higher temporal variability in abundance than unexploited species. This remains true after accounting for life-history effects, abundance, ecological traits and phylogeny. The increased variability of exploited populations is probably caused by fishery-induced truncation of the age structure, which reduces the capacity of populations to buffer environmental events1,5,8,9. Therefore, to avoid collapse, fisheries must be managed not only to sustain the total viable biomass but also to prevent the significant truncation of age structure1,5,8,9. The double jeopardy of fishing to potentially deplete stock sizes and, more immediately, to amplify the peaks and valleys of population variability7, calls for a precautionary management approach10,11.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Fisheries sustainability via protection of age structure and spatial distribution of fish populations. Fisheries 29, 23–32 (2004)

  2. 2.

    , & Quantitative ecosystem indicators for fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 307–614 (2005)

  3. 3.

    et al. Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305, 346–347 (2004)

  4. 4.

    et al. A comparison of long-term trends and variability in populations of larvae of exploited and unexploited fishes in the Southern California region: a community approach. Prog. Oceanogr. 67, 160–185 (2005)

  5. 5.

    & Marine fish population collapses: consequences for recovery and extinction risk. Bioscience 13, 297–309 (2004)

  6. 6.

    , , , & The ecosystem approach to fisheries. Issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 443, 1–71 (2003)

  7. 7.

    & Harvesting natural populations in a randomly fluctuating environment. Science 197, 463–465 (1977)

  8. 8.

    , & Impacts of demographic variation in spawning characteristics on reference points for fishery management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 58, 1002–1014 (2001)

  9. 9.

    Vital statistics of the Pacific sardine (Sardinops Caerulea) and the population consequences. Ecology 48, 731–736 (1967)

  10. 10.

    , , & Distinguishing random environmental fluctuations from ecological catastrophes for the North Pacific Ocean. Nature 435, 336–340 (2005)

  11. 11.

    , , , & Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413, 591–596 (2001)

  12. 12.

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (FAO). Review of the State of World Marine Fishery Resources (FAO, Rome, 2005)

  13. 13.

    & Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 423, 280–283 (2003)

  14. 14.

    Collapse and recovery of marine fishes. Nature 406, 882–885 (2000)

  15. 15.

    , , , & Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the North Sea. Nature 426, 661–664 (2003)

  16. 16.

    , , & Fisheries productivity in the northeastern Pacific Ocean over the past 2,200 years. Nature 416, 729–733 (2002)

  17. 17.

    , , , & A Pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 78, 1069–1079 (1997)

  18. 18.

    , , & Exploiting natural populations in an uncertain world. Math. Biosci. 42, 219–252 (1978)

  19. 19.

    , , & The precautionary approach and risk management: can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 99–107 (2001)

  20. 20.

    The Balance of Nature? Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities 39–58 (University of Chicago, Chicago, 1991)

  21. 21.

    , & Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. Science 260, 17, 36 (1993)

  22. 22.

    & Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: implications for population regulation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49, 2196–2218 (1992)

  23. 23.

    & Match/mismatch predictions of spawning duration versus recruitment variability. Fish. Oceanogr. 3, 1–14 (1994)

  24. 24.

    & Influence of fecundity on recruitment variability of marine fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53, 1618–1625 (1996)

  25. 25.

    & Measuring marine fishes biodiversity: temporal changes in abundance, life history and demography. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 360, 315–338 (2005)

  26. 26.

    & Effect of age on the seasonality of maturation and spawning of Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, in the northwest Atlantic. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 2468–2474 (1993)

  27. 27.

    Duration and intensity of spawning in herring Clupea harengus as related to the age structure of the population. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 39, 209–220 (1987)

  28. 28.

    & Maternal influence on the size and viability of Iceland cod (Gadus morhua) eggs and larvae. J. Fish Biol. 52, 1241–1258 (1998)

  29. 29.

    & Regulation in fish populations: myth or mirage?. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 330, 151–164 (1990)

  30. 30.

    & Statistical Analysis with Missing Data 164–220 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the CalCOFI for the use of the data. R. Hewitt, D. Checkley, M. Ohman, S. Sandin, M. Maunder, P. Hastings, K. Roy, D. Lucas and S. Glaser provided discussion and comments on this work. A. MacCall, K. Hill, D. Sampson, I. Stewart, J. Cope, D. Aseltin-Nelson and J. Mason provided fisheries-related data. B. Macewicz, N. Lo, B. Watson and S. Suyama provided data and comments on life-history traits of fishes. Our study was funded by NOAA Fisheries and the Environment (FATE), the National Marine Fisheries Service, NSF/LTER CCE ‘Nonlinear Transitions in the California Current Coastal Pelagic Ecosystem’, the Center for Marine Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Taiwan Oceanic University, the Deutsche Bank Complexity Studies Fund and the Sugihara Family Trust. Author Contributions C.H. and G.S. conceived the original study. C.H. is responsible for the statistical analyses and uncovering the main result. All co-authors contributed to refining the analysis, framing and interpreting the result, and to its final exposition.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0202, USA

    • Chih-hao Hsieh
    • , John R. Hunter
    •  & George Sugihara
  2. Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, California 92037-1508, USA

    • Christian S. Reiss
  3. Division of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, RSM Building, South Kensington campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK

    • John R. Beddington
  4. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK

    • Robert M. May

Authors

  1. Search for Chih-hao Hsieh in:

  2. Search for Christian S. Reiss in:

  3. Search for John R. Hunter in:

  4. Search for John R. Beddington in:

  5. Search for Robert M. May in:

  6. Search for George Sugihara in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Sugihara.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Notes

    This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Results, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Tables and Supplementary Figures

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05232

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.