Abstract
Dehydration or desiccation is one of the most frequent and severe challenges to living cells1. The bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans is the best known extremophile among the few organisms that can survive extremely high exposures to desiccation and ionizing radiation, which shatter its genome into hundreds of short DNA fragments2,3,4,5. Remarkably, these fragments are readily reassembled into a functional 3.28-megabase genome. Here we describe the relevant two-stage DNA repair process, which involves a previously unknown molecular mechanism for fragment reassembly called ‘extended synthesis-dependent strand annealing’ (ESDSA), followed and completed by crossovers. At least two genome copies and random DNA breakage are requirements for effective ESDSA. In ESDSA, chromosomal fragments with overlapping homologies are used both as primers and as templates for massive synthesis of complementary single strands, as occurs in a single-round multiplex polymerase chain reaction. This synthesis depends on DNA polymerase I and incorporates more nucleotides than does normal replication in intact cells. Newly synthesized complementary single-stranded extensions become ‘sticky ends’ that anneal with high precision, joining together contiguous DNA fragments into long, linear, double-stranded intermediates. These intermediates require RecA-dependent crossovers to mature into circular chromosomes that comprise double-stranded patchworks of numerous DNA blocks synthesized before radiation, connected by DNA blocks synthesized after radiation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Structural and DNA end resection study of the bacterial NurA-HerA complex
BMC Biology Open Access 24 February 2023
-
Characterization of gross genome rearrangements in Deinococcus radiodurans recA mutants
Scientific Reports Open Access 25 May 2021
-
Gene expression in diapausing rotifer eggs in response to divergent environmental predictability regimes
Scientific Reports Open Access 07 December 2020
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




References
Potts, M. Desiccation tolerance: a simple process? Trends Microbiol. 9, 553–559 (2001)
Minton, K. W. DNA repair in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Mol. Microbiol. 13, 9–15 (1994)
Battista, J. R., Earl, A. M. & Park, M. J. Why is Deinococcus radiodurans so resistant to ionizing radiation? Trends Microbiol. 7, 362–365 (1999)
Mattimore, V. & Battista, J. R. Radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans: functions necessary to survive ionizing radiation are also necessary to survive prolonged desiccation. J. Bacteriol. 178, 633–637 (1996)
Sanders, S. W. & Maxcy, R. B. Isolation of radiation-resistant bacteria without exposure to radiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 38, 436–439 (1979)
Krasin, F. & Hutchinson, F. Repair of DNA double-strand breaks in Escherichia coli which requires recA function and the presence of duplicate genome. J. Mol. Biol. 116, 81–98 (1977)
Fujimori, A. et al. Rad52 partially substitutes for Rad51 paralog XRCC3 in maintaining chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 20, 5513–5520 (2001)
Dean, C. J., Feldschreiber, P. & Lett, J. T. Repair of X-ray damage to the deoxyribonucleic acid in Micrococcus radiodurans. Nature 209, 49–52 (1966)
White, O. et al. Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. Science 286, 1571–1577 (1999)
Ferreira, A. C. et al. Characterization and radiation resistance of new isolates of Rubrobacter radiotolerans and Rubrobacter xylanophilus. Extremophiles 3, 235–238 (1999)
Narumi, I. Unlocking radiation resistance mechanisms: still a long way to go. Trends Microbiol. 11, 422–425 (2003)
Cox, M. M. & Battista, J. R. Deinococcus radiodurans—the consummate survivor. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 3, 882–892 (2005)
Harsojo. Kitayama, S. & Matsuyama, A. Genome multiplicity and radiation resistance in Micrococcus radiodurans. J. Biochem. 90, 877–880 (1981)
Levin-Zaidman, S. et al. Ringlike structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans genome: a key to radioresistance? Science 299, 254–256 (2003)
Zimmerman, J. M. & Battista, J. R. A ring-like nucleoid is not necessary for radioresistance in Deinococcaceae. BMC Microbiol. 5, 17–27 (2005)
Daly, M. J. & Minton, K. W. An alternative pathway of recombination of chromosomal fragments precedes recA-dependent recombination in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J. Bacteriol. 178, 4461–4471 (1996)
Meselson, M. & Stahl, F. W. The replication of DNA. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 23, 9–12 (1958)
Lion, M. B. Search for a mechanism for the increased sensitivity of 5-bromouracil-substituted DNA to ultraviolet radiation. II. Single-strand breaks in the DNA of irradiated 5-bromouracil-substituted T3 coliphage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 209, 24–33 (1970)
Lohman, P. H. M., Bootsma, D. & Hey, A. H. The influence of 5-bromodeoxyuridine on the induction of breaks in deoxyribonucleic acid of cultivated human cells by X-irradiation and ultraviolet light. Radiat. Res. 52, 627–641 (1972)
Lin, J. et al. Whole-genome shotgun optical mapping of Deinococcus radiodurans. Science 285, 1558–1562 (1999)
Milligan, J. R. et al. DNA strand-break yield after incubation with base excision repair endonucleases implicate hydroxyl radical pairs in double-strand break formation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 76, 1475–1483 (2000)
Lindahl, T. DNA repair enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 51, 61–87 (1982)
Makarova, K. S. et al. Genome of the extremely radiation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans viewed from the perspective of comparative genomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 44–79 (2001)
Rayssiguier, C., Thaler, D. S. & Radman, M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature 342, 396–401 (1989)
Mennecier, S., Coste, G., Servant, P., Bailone, A. & Sommer, S. Mismatch repair ensures fidelity of replication and recombination in the radioresistant organism Deinococcus radiodurans. Mol. Genet. Genomics 272, 460–469 (2004)
Rainey, F. A. et al. Extensive diversity of ionizing-radiation-resistant bacteria recovered from Sonoran Desert soil and description of nine new species of the genus Deinococcus from a single soil sample. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 5225–5235 (2005)
Harris, D. R. et al. Preserving genome integrity: the DdrA protein of Deinococcus radiodurans R1. PLoS Biol. 2, 1629–1639 (2004)
Anderson, A. W., Nordon, H. C., Cain, R. F., Parrish, G. & Duggan, D. Studies on a radio-resistant micrococcus. I. Isolation, morphology, cultural characteristics and resistance to γ radiation. Food Technol. 10, 575–578 (1956)
Bonacossa de Almeida, C., Coste, G., Sommer, S. & Bailone, A. Quantification of RecA protein in Deinococcus radiodurans reveals involvement of RecA, but not LexA, in its regulation. Mol. Genet. Genomics 268, 28–41 (2002)
Acknowledgements
We thank J. Battista for initial help with Deinococcus and for the polA mutant; M. Meselson, B. Wagner, A. Stark, D. Zahradka and members of the M.R. lab for reading this manuscript and/or providing advice; M. Blazevic for technical assistance on γ-irradiation; and Mikula Radman for illustrations. K.Z. held a fellowship from the Necker Institute during work in M.R.'s laboratory. D.S. holds a Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation predoctoral fellowship and A.B.L. is a Marie Curie fellow. The laboratory in the Université de Paris-Descartes was funded by INSERM and the Necker Institute (Mixis/PLIVA contract); that in the Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie by EDF-France and CNRS (GEOMEX); that in the Institut Curie by EDF-France; and that in the Ruder Boskovic Institute by the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports. Author Contributions Experiments in Figs 1 and 2 and Supplementary Fig. 4 were carried out by K.Z.; those in Fig. 3 by D.S. A.B.L. provided expertise in microscopy; and the global experimental design was by M.R. The results of Fig. 1b, f, were obtained in, and with the scientific and material support of, the Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie; those of Fig. 1a, e, in the Institut Curie; those of refs Figs 1c, d, and Supplementary Fig. 4 in the Ruder Boskovic Institute, and those of Fig. 3 in the Université de Paris-Descartes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Data
This file contains the full-length reviewed article. (DOC 1271 kb)
Supplementary Notes
This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Results, Supplementary Discussion and additional references. (PDF 93 kb)
Supplementary Figure 1
Analysis of repaired D. radiodurans DNA by 5-BrdU density labelling. (PPT 55 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zahradka, K., Slade, D., Bailone, A. et al. Reassembly of shattered chromosomes in Deinococcus radiodurans. Nature 443, 569–573 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05160
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05160
This article is cited by
-
Structural and DNA end resection study of the bacterial NurA-HerA complex
BMC Biology (2023)
-
Radioresistance and radiosensitivity: a biophysical approach on bacterial cells robustness
Theory in Biosciences (2023)
-
Genomic attributes of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic bacteria and archaea
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology (2022)
-
Characterization of gross genome rearrangements in Deinococcus radiodurans recA mutants
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Functional and structural characterization of Deinococcus radiodurans R1 MazEF toxin-antitoxin system, Dr0416-Dr0417
Journal of Microbiology (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.