Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Protein evolution

Causes of trends in amino-acid gain and loss

Abstract

Arising from: I. K. Jordan et al. Nature 433, 633–638 (2005); Jordan et al. reply

Understanding how proteins evolve is important for determining the molecular basis of adaptation, for inferring phylogenies and for engineering novel proteins. It has been suggested that some amino acids were incorporated into the genetic code more recently than others1 and, after comparing pairs of closely related genomes, Jordan et al.2 report that 'recent' amino acids are becoming more common. They argue that this process has been going on since the genetic code first evolved to encompass all 20 amino acids. Here we provide evidence that the patterns observed conform with standard, nearly neutral theoretical expectations3 and require no new explanation. This reinforces the need for caution in the interpretation of results derived from closely related taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The observed profile of gains or losses per amino acid compared with that expected from the underlying nucleotide-level mutation bias and codon content.
Figure 2: Relation between divergence between taxa and bias in amino-acid gain and loss.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trifonov, E. N. J. Biomol. Struct. Dynam. 22, 1–11 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jordan, I. K. et al. Nature 433, 633–638 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald, J. H. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 240–244 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rocha, E. P. et al. J. Theor. Biol. 239, 226–235 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharp, P. M. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356, 867–876 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho, S. Y., Phillips, M. J., Cooper, A. & Drummond, A. J. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1561–1568 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Penny, D. Nature 436, 183–184 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks, D. J., Fresco, J. R., Lesk, A. M. & Singh, M. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1645–1655 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akashi, H. & Gojobori, T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3695–3700 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keightley, P. D., Lercher, M. J. & Eyre-Walker, A. PLoS Biol. 3, 282–288 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence D. Hurst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurst, L., Feil, E. & Rocha, E. Causes of trends in amino-acid gain and loss. Nature 442, E11–E12 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05137

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05137

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing