Letter | Published:

Horizontal endosymbiont transmission in hydrothermal vent tubeworms

Nature volume 441, pages 345348 (18 May 2006) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Transmission of obligate bacterial symbionts between generations is vital for the survival of the host. Although the larvae of certain hydrothermal vent tubeworms (Vestimentifera, Siboglinidae) are symbiont-free and possess a transient digestive system, these structures are lost during development, resulting in adult animals that are nutritionally dependent on their bacterial symbionts. Thus, each generation of tubeworms must be newly colonized with its specific symbiont1,2. Here we present a model for tubeworm symbiont acquisition and the development of the symbiont-housing organ, the trophosome. Our data indicate that the bacterial symbionts colonize the developing tube of the settled larvae and enter the host through the skin, a process that continues through the early juvenile stages during which the trophosome is established from mesodermal tissue. In later juvenile stages we observed massive apoptosis of host epidermis, muscles and undifferentiated mesodermal tissue, which was coincident with the cessation of the colonization process. Characterizing the symbiont transmission process in this finely tuned mutualistic symbiosis provides another model of symbiont acquisition and additional insights into underlying mechanisms common to both pathogenic infections and beneficial host–symbiont interactions.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Identification and localization of bacterial endosymbionts in hydrothermal vent taxa with symbiont-specific polymerase chain reaction amplification and in situ hybridization techniques. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 2, 51–62 (1993)

  2. 2.

    et al. Genetic variation among endosymbionts of widely distributed vestimentiferan tubeworms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 651–658 (2000)

  3. 3.

    & The Rhizobium–plant symbiosis. Microbiol. Rev. 59, 124–142 (1995)

  4. 4.

    & Developmental biology in marine invertebrate symbioses. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3, 603–607 (2000)

  5. 5.

    Microalgal–invertebrate symbioses: a review. Endocytobiosis Cell Res. 9, 135–175 (1993)

  6. 6.

    & Evidence for a transient digestive tract in Vestimentifera. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 101, 423–433 (1988)

  7. 7.

    Development of the gut and segmentation of newly settled stages of Ridgeia (Vestimentifera): Implications for relationship between Vestimentifera and Pogonophora. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 68, 465–487 (1988)

  8. 8.

    & Larval development and the formation of the gut Siboglinum poseidoni Flügel & Langhof (Pogonophora, Perviata), evidence of protostomian affinity. Sarsia 80, 73–89 (1995)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Molecular phylogenetics of bacterial endosymbionts and their vestimentiferan hosts. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 6, 268–277 (1997)

  10. 10.

    et al. Temporal and spatial patterns of biological community development at nascent deep-sea hydrothermal vents (9°50′N, East Pacific Rise). Deep-sea Res. II 45, 465–515 (1998)

  11. 11.

    , , , & Modeling the mutualistic interactions between tubeworms and microbial consortia. PLoS Biol. 3, e77 (2005)

  12. 12.

    , & Osedax: bone-eating marine worms with dwarf males. Science 305, 668–671 (2004)

  13. 13.

    , & Pogonophora (Annelida): form and function. Hydrobiologia 535/536, 227–251 (2005)

  14. 14.

    & Ultrastructural reinvestigation of the trophosome in adults of Riftia pachyptila (Annelida, Siboglinidae). Invertebr. Biol. 122, 345–366 (2003)

  15. 15.

    Larvae. Microfauna Marina 4, 353–371 (1988)

  16. 16.

    , , & Embryology of vestimentiferan tube worms from deep-sea methane/sulphide seeps. Nature 381, 514–516 (1996)

  17. 17.

    , , & Larval dispersal potential of the tubeworm Riftia pachyptila at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Nature 411, 77–80 (2001)

  18. 18.

    Toward an understanding of the molecular mechanisms of physiological cell death. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 786–789 (1993)

  19. 19.

    Developmental cell death: morphological diversity and multiple mechanisms. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 181, 195–213 (1990)

  20. 20.

    & Pathways of apoptosis and importance in development. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 9, 345–359 (2005)

  21. 21.

    & Apoptosis in bacterial pathogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 100, 493–495 (1997)

  22. 22.

    , & Apoptosis, but not necrosis, of infected monocytes is coupled with killing of intracellular bacillus Calmette-Guerin. J. Exp. Med. 180, 1499–1509 (1994)

  23. 23.

    & Induction of apoptosis by cooperative bacteria in the morphogenesis of host epithelial tissues. Dev. Genes Evol. 208, 295–303 (1998)

  24. 24.

    , , & Tubeworm succession at hydrothermal vents: use of biogenic cues to reduce habitat selection error? Oecologia 123, 275–284 (2000)

  25. 25.

    , , & Characterization of chemoautotrophic symbionts in a gutless marine worm (Oligochaeta, Annelida) by phylogenetic 16S rRNA sequence analysis and in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 2346–2350 (1995)

  26. 26.

    et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1363–1371 (2004)

  27. 27.

    et al. The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D294–D296 (2005)

  28. 28.

    et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 12–17 (1999)

  29. 29.

    , , , & The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: Development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 22, 434–444 (1999)

  30. 30.

    , , , & Phylogenetic oligonucleotide probes for the major subclasses of Proteobacteria: Problems and solutions. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 15, 593–600 (1992)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the captain and crew of the RV Atlantis and the crew of the DSV Alvin for their continuous support; H. Grillitsch for the schematic illustrations; P. Gahleitner for sectioning; W. Klepal for the EM support; S. C. Cary, C. M. Cavanaugh (grants from NOAA and NSF), J. J. Childress and L. S. Mullineaux for their hospitality on cruises; and C. M. Cavanaugh and M. Horn for their comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Austrian Science Foundation and the Austrian Academy of Science to M.B., by a grant from the Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna to A.D.N., and a grant from the US National Science Foundation to C.R.F. Author Contributions M.B. was the project leader, designed the TASCs and performed the t.e.m. work; A.D.N. performed the molecular work and was responsible for the data collection; and A.D.N., C.R.F. and M.B. performed the field work and wrote the paper.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Marine Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

    • Andrea D. Nussbaumer
    •  & Monika Bright
  2. Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, 208 Mueller Laboratory, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

    • Charles R. Fisher

Authors

  1. Search for Andrea D. Nussbaumer in:

  2. Search for Charles R. Fisher in:

  3. Search for Monika Bright in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Bright.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Notes

    This file contains the Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figures and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04793

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.