Letter | Published:

Experience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex

Naturevolume 441pages979983 (2006) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Functional circuits in the adult neocortex adjust to novel sensory experience, but the underlying synaptic mechanisms remain unknown1. Growth and retraction of dendritic spines with synapse formation and elimination could change brain circuits2,3,4,5,6,7. In the apical tufts of layer 5B (L5B) pyramidal neurons in the mouse barrel cortex, a subset of dendritic spines appear and disappear over days, whereas most spines are persistent for months4,5,6,8,9. Under baseline conditions, new spines are mostly transient and rarely survive for more than a week. Transient spines tend to be small4,5,9, whereas persistent spines are usually large4,5,6,8,9. Because most excitatory synapses in the cortex occur on spines, and because synapse size10 and the number of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptors11,12,13 are proportional to spine volume, the excitation of pyramidal neurons is probably driven through synapses on persistent spines. Here we test whether the generation and loss of persistent spines are enhanced by novel sensory experience. We repeatedly imaged dendritic spines for one month after trimming alternate whiskers, a paradigm that induces adaptive functional changes in neocortical circuits14,15. Whisker trimming stabilized new spines and destabilized previously persistent spines. New-persistent spines always formed synapses. They were preferentially added on L5B neurons with complex apical tufts rather than simple tufts. Our data indicate that novel sensory experience drives the stabilization of new spines on subclasses of cortical neurons. These synaptic changes probably underlie experience-dependent remodelling of specific neocortical circuits.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Buonomano, D. V. & Merzenich, M. M. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 149–186 (1998)

  2. 2

    Bailey, C. H. & Kandel, E. R. Structural changes accompanying memory formation. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 55, 397–426 (1993)

  3. 3

    Knott, G. W., Quairiaux, C., Genoud, C. & Welker, E. Formation of dendritic spines with GABAergic synapses induced by whisker stimulation in adult mice. Neuron 34, 265–273 (2002)

  4. 4

    Trachtenberg, J. T. et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature 420, 788–794 (2002)

  5. 5

    Holtmaat, A. J. et al. Transient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo. Neuron 45, 279–291 (2005)

  6. 6

    Zuo, Y., Yang, G., Kwon, E. & Gan, W. B. Long-term sensory deprivation prevents dendritic spine loss in primary somatosensory cortex. Nature 436, 261–265 (2005)

  7. 7

    De Paola, V. et al. Cell type-specific structural plasticity of axonal branches and boutons in the adult neocortex. Neuron 49, 861–875 (2006)

  8. 8

    Grutzendler, J., Kasthuri, N. & Gan, W. B. Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature 420, 812–816 (2002)

  9. 9

    Majewska, A. K., Newton, J. R. & Sur, M. Remodeling of synaptic structure in sensory cortical areas in vivo. J. Neurosci. 26, 3021–3029 (2006)

  10. 10

    Harris, K. M. & Stevens, J. K. Dendritic spines of CA1 pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus: serial electron microscopy with reference to their biophysical characterisitcs. J. Neurosci. 9, 2982–2997 (1989)

  11. 11

    Nusser, Z. et al. Cell type and pathway dependence of synaptic AMPA receptor number and variability in the hippocampus. Neuron 21, 545–559 (1998)

  12. 12

    Takumi, Y., Ramirez-Leon, V., Laake, P., Rinvik, E. & Ottersen, O. P. Different modes of expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors in hippocampal synapses. Nature Neurosci. 2, 618–624 (1999)

  13. 13

    Matsuzaki, M. et al. Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nature Neurosci. 4, 1086–1092 (2001)

  14. 14

    Diamond, M. E., Huang, W. & Ebner, F. F. Laminar comparison of somatosensory cortical plasticity. Science 265, 1885–1888 (1994)

  15. 15

    Fox, K. Anatomical pathways and molecular mechanisms for plasticity in the barrel cortex. Neuroscience 111, 799–814 (2002)

  16. 16

    Denk, W., Strickler, J. H. & Webb, W. W. Two-photon laser scanning microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990)

  17. 17

    Denk, W. & Svoboda, K. Photon upmanship: why multiphoton imaging is more than a gimmick. Neuron 18, 351–357 (1997)

  18. 18

    Feng, G. et al. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron 28, 41–51 (2000)

  19. 19

    Glazewski, S. & Fox, K. Time course of experience-dependent synaptic potentiation and depression in barrel cortex of adolescent rats. J. Neurophysiol. 75, 1714–1729 (1996)

  20. 20

    Shepherd, G. M., Pologruto, T. A. & Svoboda, K. Circuit analysis of experience-dependent plasticity in the developing rat barrel cortex. Neuron 38, 277–289 (2003)

  21. 21

    Lu, S. M. & Lin, R. C. S. Thalamic afferents of the rat barrel cortex: a light- and electron-microscopic study using Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin as an anterograde tracer. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 10, 1–16 (1993)

  22. 22

    Toni, N., Buchs, P. A., Nikonenko, I., Bron, C. R. & Muller, D. LTP promotes formation of multiple spine synapses between a single axon terminal and a dendrite. Nature 402, 421–425 (1999)

  23. 23

    Yuste, R. & Bonhoeffer, T. Genesis of dendritic spines: insights from ultrastructural and imaging studies. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5, 24–34 (2004)

  24. 24

    Jontes, J. D. & Smith, S. J. Filopodia, spines, and the generation of synaptic diversity. Neuron 27, 11–14 (2000)

  25. 25

    Chagnac-Amitai, Y., Luhmann, H. J. & Prince, D. A. Burst generating and regular spiking layer 5 pyramidal neurons of rat neocortex have different morphological features. J. Comp. Neurol. 296, 598–613 (1990)

  26. 26

    Larkman, A. & Mason, A. Correlations between morphology and electrophysiology of pyramidal neurons in slices of rat visual cortex. I. Establishment of cell classes. J. Neurosci. 10, 1407–1414 (1990)

  27. 27

    Kasper, E. M., Larkman, A. U., Lubke, J. & Blakemore, C. Pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of the rat visual cortex. I. Correlation among cell morphology, intrinsic electrophysiological properties, and axon targets. J. Comp. Neurol. 339, 459–474 (1994)

  28. 28

    Tsiola, A., Hamzei-Sichani, F., Peterlin, Z. & Yuste, R. Quantitative morphologic classification of layer 5 neurons from mouse primary visual cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 461, 415–428 (2003)

  29. 29

    Pologruto, T. A., Sabatini, B. L. & Svoboda, K. ScanImage: Flexible software for operating laser-scanning microscopes. Biomed. Eng. Online 2, 13 (2003)

  30. 30

    Fiala, J. C., Feinberg, M., Popov, V. & Harris, K. M. Synaptogenesis via dendritic filopodia in developing hippocampal area CA1. J. Neurosci. 18, 8900–8911 (1998)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Petreanu for suggesting the comparison of cell types; V. DePaola, B. Burbach and C. Musetti for help with experiments; K. Masback for data analysis; T. O'Connor for writing the spine analysis software; and V. DePaola, G. Shepherd, J. Trachtenberg and K. Zito for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the NIH and the Swiss National Science Foundation (G.W.K, E.W.).Author Contributions A.H. and L.W. contributed equally to this work. A.H. and L.W. performed the imaging experiments. K.S. built the custom microscope. G.W.K. performed the ssEM reconstructions with help from A.H. and L.W. G.W.K., A.H. and L.W. performed the cell reconstructions. A.H., L.W. and K.S. analysed the data and wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 11724, USA

    • Anthony Holtmaat
    • , Linda Wilbrecht
    •  & Karel Svoboda
  2. Institut de biologie cellulaire et de morphologie (IBCM), Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 9, CH 1005, Switzerland

    • Graham W. Knott
    •  & Egbert Welker

Authors

  1. Search for Anthony Holtmaat in:

  2. Search for Linda Wilbrecht in:

  3. Search for Graham W. Knott in:

  4. Search for Egbert Welker in:

  5. Search for Karel Svoboda in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karel Svoboda.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Notes

    This file contains Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, Supplementary Discussion 1 and 2, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary References (PDF 37 kb)

  2. Supplementary Figure 1

    Survival function (PDF 91 kb)

  3. Supplementary Figure 2

    Location-dependent growth of persistent spines. (PDF 196 kb)

  4. Supplementary Figure 3

    New spine growth. (PDF 100 kb)

  5. Supplementary Figure 4

    Examples of complex-tuft and simple-tuft cells and correlations. (PDF 126 kb)

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04783

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.