Letter | Published:

Suppression of dwarf galaxy formation by cosmic reionization

Nature volume 441, pages 322324 (18 May 2006) | Download Citation



A large number of faint galaxies, born less than a billion years after the Big Bang, have recently been discovered1,2,3,4,5,6. Fluctuations in the distribution of these galaxies contributed to a scatter in the ionization fraction of cosmic hydrogen on scales of tens of megaparsecs, as observed along the lines of sight to the earliest known quasars7,8,9. Theoretical simulations predict that the formation of dwarf galaxies should have been suppressed after cosmic hydrogen was reionized10,11,12,13, leading to a drop in the cosmic star-formation rate14. Here we report evidence for this suppression. We show that the post-reionization galaxies that produced most of the ionizing radiation at a redshift z ≈ 5.5 must have had a mass in excess of 1010.9 ± 0.5 solar masses (M) or else the aforementioned scatter would have been smaller than observed. This limiting mass is two orders of magnitude larger than the galaxy mass that is thought to have dominated the reionization of cosmic hydrogen (108M). We predict that future surveys with space-based infrared telescopes will detect a population of smaller galaxies that reionized the Universe at an earlier time, before the epoch of dwarf galaxy suppression.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & Lyα emitters at z = 5.7. Astrophys. J. Lett. 563, 5–8 (2001)

  2. 2.

    et al. Subaru Deep Survey. IV. Discovery of a large-scale structure at redshift 5. Astrophys. J. Lett. 586, 111–114 (2003)

  3. 3.

    et al. Galaxies at z = 7–8: z850-dropouts in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. Astrophys. J. Lett. 616, 79–82 (2004)

  4. 4.

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Blakeslee, J. P. & Franx, M. Galaxies at z6: The rest-frame UV luminosity function and luminosity density from 506 UDF, UDF-PS, and goods I-dropouts. Preprint at (2005).

  5. 5.

    et al. Subaru Deep Survey. VI. A census of Lyman break galaxies at z = 4 and 5 in the Subaru deep fields: Clustering properties. Astrophys. J. 611, 685–702 (2004)

  6. 6.

    Stark, D. P. & Ellis, M. Searching for the sources responsible for cosmic reionization: Probing the redshift range 7 < z < 10 and beyond. Preprint at (2005).

  7. 7.

    in Proc. Tenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity (eds Novello, M., Perez-Bergliaffa, S. & Ruffini, R.) (World Scientific, Singapore, in the press); preprint at (2004)

  8. 8.

    , & Quasars as probes of late reionization and early structure formation. New Astron. Rev. 50, 140–145 (2006)

  9. 9.

    Fan, X. et al. Constraining the evolution of the ionizing background and the epoch of reionization with z6 quasars. II: Analysis using a sample of 19 quasars. Preprint at (2005).

  10. 10.

    Suppressing the formation of dwarf galaxies via photoionization. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 256, 43–47 (1992)

  11. 11.

    , & Photoionization and the formation of dwarf galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 278, L49–L54 (1996)

  12. 12.

    & Hydrodynamic simulations of galaxy formation. II. Photoionization and the formation of low-mass galaxies. Astrophys. J. 465, 608–616 (1996)

  13. 13.

    , , & Photoionization feedback in low-mass galaxies at high redshift. Astrophys. J. 601, 666–675 (2004)

  14. 14.

    & Identifying the reionization redshift from the cosmic star formation rate. Astrophys. J. 539, 20–25 (2000)

  15. 15.

    et al. A survey of z > 5.7 quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III: Discovery of five additional quasars. Astron. J. (in the press); preprint at (2005)

  16. 16.

    et al. VLT optical and near-infrared observations of the z = 6.28 quasar SDSS J1030 + 0524. Astron. J. 123, 2151–2158 (2002)

  17. 17.

    , , & Probing the ionization state of the Universe at z > 6. Astron. J. 126, 1–14 (2003)

  18. 18.

    & A large neutral fraction of cosmic hydrogen a billion years after the Big Bang. Nature 427, 815–817 (2004)

  19. 19.

    et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of three redshift z = 5.7 Lyα emitters from the large-area Lyman alpha survey. Astron. J. 125, 1006–1013 (2003)

  20. 20.

    , , & The star formation rate of the Universe at z6 from the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 355, 374–384 (2004)

  21. 21.

    , , & A faint star-forming system viewed through the lensing cluster Abell 2218: First light at z5.6? Astrophys. J. Lett. 560, 119–122 (2001)

  22. 22.

    , , , & The abundance of low-luminosity Lyα emitter at high redshift. Astrophys. J. 606, 683–701 (2004)

  23. 23.

    , , & A probable z7 galaxy strongly lensed by the rich cluster A2218: Exploring the Dark Ages. Astrophys. J. 607, 697–703 (2004)

  24. 24.

    , & Was the Universe reionized at redshift 10? Astrophys. J. 620, 553–558 (2005)

  25. 25.

    , & Ellipsoidal collapse and an improved model for the number and spatial distribution of dark matter haloes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 323, 1–12 (2001)

  26. 26.

    et al. Starburst99: Synthesis models for galaxies with active star formation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 123, 3–40 (1999)

  27. 27.

    Wyithe, J. S. B. & Loeb, A. Cosmic variance in the transparency of the intergalactic medium after reionization. Preprint at (2006).

  28. 28.

    & Unusually large fluctuations in the statistics of galaxy formation at high redshift. Astrophys. J. 609, 474–481 (2004)

  29. 29.

    , & Have we detected patchy reionization in quasar spectra? Astrophys. J. Lett. 639, 47–50 (2006)

  30. 30.

    & Effective screening due to minihalos during the epoch of reionization. Astrophys. J. 578, 1–11 (2002)

  31. 31.

    & Feedback and the fundamental line of low-luminosity low-surface-brightness/dwarf galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, 1131–1144 (2003)

  32. 32.

    et al. The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 105 low-redshift galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 341, 54–69 (2003)

  33. 33.

    Spergel, D. N. et al. Three-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Implications for cosmology. Astrophys. J. (submitted); preprint at (2006).

Download references


This work was supported in part by grants from ARC, NSF and NASA. We acknowledge helpful discussions with A. Lidz regarding this work.

Author information


  1. University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia

    • J. Stuart B. Wyithe
  2. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

    • Abraham Loeb


  1. Search for J. Stuart B. Wyithe in:

  2. Search for Abraham Loeb in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to J. Stuart B. Wyithe or Abraham Loeb.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Discussion

    The Letter to Nature with the above title interprets the observed luminosity function of z~6 galaxies and the large-scale fluctuations in the Lyman-alpha optical depth towards z~6 quasars, based on a detailed theoretical model. This supplement provides full details on the basic version of this model as well as its variants.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.