Abstract
Humans regularly produce new utterances that are understood by other members of the same language community1. Linguistic theories account for this ability through the use of syntactic rules (or generative grammars) that describe the acceptable structure of utterances2. The recursive, hierarchical embedding of language units (for example, words or phrases within shorter sentences) that is part of the ability to construct new utterances minimally requires a ‘context-free’ grammar2,3 that is more complex than the ‘finite-state’ grammars thought sufficient to specify the structure of all non-human communication signals. Recent hypotheses make the central claim that the capacity for syntactic recursion forms the computational core of a uniquely human language faculty4,5. Here we show that European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) accurately recognize acoustic patterns defined by a recursive, self-embedding, context-free grammar. They are also able to classify new patterns defined by the grammar and reliably exclude agrammatical patterns. Thus, the capacity to classify sequences from recursive, centre-embedded grammars is not uniquely human. This finding opens a new range of complex syntactic processing mechanisms to physiological investigation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Syntactic chunking reveals a core syntactic representation of multi-digit numbers, which is generative and automatic
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications Open Access 06 July 2022
-
Overlooked evidence for semantic compositionality and signal reduction in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Animal Cognition Open Access 25 November 2021
-
Towards ending the animal cognition war: a three-dimensional model of causal cognition
Biology & Philosophy Open Access 19 February 2021
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
£199.00
only £3.90 per issue
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.




References
Hockett, C. F. The origin of speech. Sci. Am. 203, 89–96 (1960)
Chomsky, N. Syntactic Structures (Mouton, The Hague, 1957)
Hopcroft, J. & Ullman, J. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1979)
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569–1579 (2002)
Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D. & Chomsky, N. The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition 97, 179–210 (2005)
Eens, M. Understanding the complex song of the European starling: An integrated approach. Adv. Study Behav. 26, 355–434 (1997)
Gentner, T. Q. & Hulse, S. H. Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Anim. Behav. 56, 579–594 (1998)
Gentner, T. Q. & Hulse, S. H. Perceptual classification based on the component structure of song in European starlings. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3369–3381 (2000)
Gentner, T. Q. & Margoliash, D. Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects. Nature 424, 669–674 (2003)
Hauser, M. D., Newport, E. L. & Aslin, R. N. Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins. Cognition 78, B53–B64 (2001)
Hauser, M. D., Weiss, D. & Marcus, G. Rule learning by cotton-top tamarins. Cognition 86, B15–B22 (2002)
Fitch, W. T. & Hauser, M. D. Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303, 377–380 (2004)
Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. The faculty of language: what's special about it? Cognition 95, 201–236 (2005)
Acknowledgements
We thank T. Brawn for help in conducting some of these experiments, and A. Henly, P. Visser and L. Kay for comments on an earlier draft. This research was supported by an NIH grant to D.M.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Note
This file contains the Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Tables and Supplementary Figures. (PDF 1351 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gentner, T., Fenn, K., Margoliash, D. et al. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature 440, 1204–1207 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04675
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04675
This article is cited by
-
Syntactic chunking reveals a core syntactic representation of multi-digit numbers, which is generative and automatic
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2022)
-
Overlooked evidence for semantic compositionality and signal reduction in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Animal Cognition (2022)
-
Towards ending the animal cognition war: a three-dimensional model of causal cognition
Biology & Philosophy (2021)
-
Statistical learning for vocal sequence acquisition in a songbird
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Baboons (Papio papio) Process a Context-Free but Not a Context-Sensitive Grammar
Scientific Reports (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.