Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Bone histology indicates insular dwarfism in a new Late Jurassic sauropod dinosaur


Sauropod dinosaurs were the largest animals ever to inhabit the land, with truly gigantic forms in at least three lineages1,2,3. Small species with an adult body mass less than five tonnes are very rare4,5, and small sauropod bones generally represent juveniles. Here we describe a new diminutive species of basal macronarian sauropod, Europasaurus holgeri gen. et sp. nov., and on the basis of bone histology we show it to have been a dwarf species. The fossils, including excellent skull material, come from Kimmeridgian marine beds of northern Germany6,7, and record more than 11 individuals of sauropods 1.7 to 6.2 m in total body length. Morphological overlap between partial skeletons and isolated bones links all material to the same new taxon. Cortical histology of femora and tibiae indicates that size differences within the specimens are due to different ontogenetic stages, from juveniles to fully grown individuals. The little dinosaurs must have lived on one of the large islands around the Lower Saxony basin8. Comparison with the long-bone histology of large-bodied sauropods suggests that the island dwarf species evolved through a decrease in growth rate from its larger ancestor.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Europasaurus holgeri gen. et sp. nov.
Figure 2: Histological growth series and sampled bones of Europasaurus holgeri gen. et sp. nov.


  1. Wilson, J. A. Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: critique and cladistic analysis. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 136, 217–276 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wedel, M. J., Cifelli, R. L. & Sanders, R. K. Sauroposeidon proteles, a new sauropod from the Early Cretaceous of Oklahoma. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 20, 109–114 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, J. B. et al. A giant sauropod dinosaur from an Upper Cretaceous mangrove deposit in Egypt. Science 292, 1704–1706 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Upchurch, P., Barrett, P. M. & Dodson, P. in The Dinosauria 2nd edn (eds Weishampel, D. B., Dodson, P. & Osmólska, H.) 259–322 (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Rauhut, O. W. M. et al. Discovery of a short-necked sauropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic period of Patagonia. Nature 435, 670–672 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lotze, F. Zum Jura des Langenberges zwischen Oker und Bad Harzburg (nördl. Harzrand). Neues Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh. 1968, 730–732 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pape, H. Die Malmschichtenfolge vom Langenberg bei Oker (nördl. Harzvorland). Mitt. Geol. Inst. Tech. Univ. Hann. 9, 41–134 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ziegler, P. A. Geological Atlas of Western and Central Europe 2nd edn (Shell International Petroleum Company, Amsterdam, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sander, P. M. Long bone histology of the Tendaguru sauropods: implications for growth and biology. Paleobiology 26, 466–488 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horner, J. R., Padian, K. & de Ricqlès, A. Comparative osteohistology of some embryonic and neonatal archosaurs: implications for variable life histories among dinosaurs. Paleobiology 27, 39–58 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erickson, G. M. Assessing dinosaur growth patterns: a microscopic revolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 677–684 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chinsamy-Turan, A. The Microstructure of Dinosaur Bone (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Turvey, S. P., Green, O. R. & Holdaway, R. N. Cortical growth marks reveal extended juvenile development in New Zealand moa. Nature 435, 940–943 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nopcsa, F. Über das Vorkommen der Dinosaurier in Siebenbürgen. Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien 54, 12–14 (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weishampel, D., Grigorescu, D. & Norman, D. B. The dinosaurs of Transsylvania. Natl Geogr. Res. 7, 196–215 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jianu, C. M. & Weishampel, D. B. The smallest of the largest: a new look at possible dwarfing in sauropod dinosaurs. Geol. Mijnbouw 78, 335–343 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dalla Vecchia, F. M. et al. Dinosaur track sites in the upper Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous) of the Istrian Peninsula (Croatia). Bol. Soc. Paleont. Ital. 40, 25–53 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weishampel, D. B., Norman, D. B. & Grigorescu, D. Telmatosaurus transsylvanicus from the Late Cretaceous of Romania: the most basal hadrosaurid dinosaur. Palaeontology 36, 361–385 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Le Loeuff, J. Romanian Late Cretaceous dinosaurs: big dwarfs or small giants? Hist. Biol. 17, 15–17 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Padian, K., de Ricqlès, A. & Horner, J. R. Dinosaurian growth rates and bird origins. Nature 412, 405–408 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. de Ricqlès, A. et al. in BoneVol. 3 Bone Matrix and Bone Specific Products (ed. Hall, B. K.) 1–78 (CRC, Boca Raton, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sander, P. M. & Tückmantel, C. Bone lamina thickness, bone apposition rates, and age estimates in sauropod humeri and femora. Paläontol. Z. 76, 161–172 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Erickson, G. M. et al. Gigantism and comparative life-history parameters of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs. Nature 430, 772–774 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sander, P. M. et al. Adaptive radiation in sauropod dinosaurs: bone histology indicates rapid evolution of giant body size through acceleration. Org. Divers. Evol. 4, 165–173 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Antunes, M. T. & Mateus, O. Dinosaurs of Portugal. C R. Palevol. 2, 77–95 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank O. Dülfer, W. Fink, D. Flemming, W. Fricke, A. Hänel, O. Heumann, D. Kranz, M. Lorsch, M. Mastroianni, R. Nimser, G. Oleschinski, U. Resch, D. Rössler, H.-J. Siber, S. Thiele, D. Unwin, F. Wesling, J. Wilson and R. Windolf. We especially appreciate the support of J. McIntosh, F. von Pupka, B. Wolter and H. Lüdtke. This research was supported by the Jurassic Foundation, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Portuguese “Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia”. This paper is contribution number 9 of the DFG Research Unit 533 “Biology of the Sauropod Dinosaurs: The Evolution of Gigantism”. Author Contributions P.M.S. was responsible for the bone histology work presented as part of this study. The morphology, systematics and taphonomy of the new sauropod was studied by the remaining authors, who are to be considered the sole authors of the name Europasaurus holgeri gen. et sp. nov.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to P. Martin Sander or Octávio Mateus.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Notes

This file contains information on the geology and taphonomy of the Langenberg quarry locality, details of the phylogenetic analysis including the data matrix, an extended diagnosis of Europasaurus holgeri gen. et sp. nov., information on body length (BL) estimates for Europasaurus and on methods of histologic study of Europasaurus long bones. This file also contains four figures. Supplementary Figure 1 provides a palaeogeographic map of Central Europe during the Kimmeridgian. Supplementary Figure 2 illustrates the various parts of the skeleton, including autapomorphic features. Supplementary Figures 3 illustrates the premaxilla bearing the cranial autapomorphy of Europasaurus. Supplementary Figure 4 illustrates the results of the phylogenetic analysis in a cladogram. (DOC 2708 kb)

*The legend to Supplementary Fig. 2 has been modified on 7 July 2006 by addition of ref. 14 to give due credit for the reconstruction of Brachiosaurus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin Sander, P., Mateus, O., Laven, T. et al. Bone histology indicates insular dwarfism in a new Late Jurassic sauropod dinosaur. Nature 441, 739–741 (2006).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing