Arthropod head segments offer a paradigm for understanding the diversification of form during evolution, as a variety of morphologically diverse appendages have arisen from them. There has been long-running controversy, however, concerning which head appendages are homologous among arthropods, and from which ancestral arrangement they have been derived. This controversy has recently been rekindled by the proposition that the probable ancestral arrangement, with appendages on the first head segment, has not been lost in all extant arthropods as previously thought, but has been retained in the pycnogonids, or sea spiders1. This proposal was based on the neuroanatomical analysis of larvae from the sea spider Anoplodactylus sp., and suggested that the most anterior pair of appendages, the chelifores, are innervated from the first part of the brain, the protocerebrum. Our examination of Hox gene expression in another sea spider, Endeis spinosa, refutes this hypothesis. The anterior boundaries of Hox gene expression domains place the chelifore appendages as clearly belonging to the second head segment, innervated from the second part of the brain, the deutocerebrum. The deutocerebrum must have been secondarily displaced towards the protocerebrum in pycnogonid ancestors. As anterior-most appendages are also deutocerebral in the other two arthropod groups, the Euchelicerata and the Mandibulata, we conclude that the protocerebral appendages have been lost in all extant arthropods.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Maxmen, A., Browne, W. E., Martindale, M. Q. & Giribet, G. Neuroanatomy of sea spiders implies an appendicular origin of the protocerebral segment. Nature 437, 1144–1148 (2005)
Budd, G. E. A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem. Nature 417, 271–275 (2002)
Scholtz, G. & Edgecombe, G. Heads, Hox and the phylogenetic position of trilobites. Crustac. Issues 16, 139–165 (2005)
Eriksson, B. J., Tait, N. N. & Budd, G. E. Head development in the onychophoran Euperipatoides kanangrensis with particular reference to the central nervous system. J. Morphol. 255, 1–23 (2003)
Mayer, G. & Koch, M. Ultrastructure and fate of the nephridial anlagen in the antennal segment of Epiperipatus biolleyi (Onychophora, Peripatidae)—evidence for the onychophoran antennae being modified legs. Arthrop. Struct. Dev. 34, 471–480 (2005)
Popadic, A., Panganiban, G., Rusch, D., Shear, W. A. & Kaufman, T. C. Molecular evidence for the gnathobasic derivation of arthropod mandibles and for the appendicular origin of the labrum and other structures. Dev. Genes Evol. 208, 142–150 (1998)
Damen, W. G. M., Hausdorf, M., Seyfarth, E.-A. & Tautz, D. A conserved mode of head segmentation in arthropods revealed by the expression pattern of Hox genes in a spider. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10665–10670 (1998)
Telford, M. J. & Thomas, R. H. Expression of homeobox genes shows chelicerate arthropods retain their deutocerebral segment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10671–10675 (1998)
Mittmann, B. & Scholtz, G. Development of the nervous system in the “head” of Limulus polyphemus (Chelicerata: Xiphosura): morphological evidence for a correspondence between the segments of the chelicerae and of the (first) antennae of Mandibulata. Dev. Genes Evol. 213, 9–17 (2003)
Mallatt, J. M., Garey, J. R. & Schultz, J. W. Ecdysozoan phylogeny and bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 31, 178–191 (2004)
Dunlop, J. A. & Arango, C. P. Pycnogonid affinities: a review. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 43, 8–21 (2005)
Giribet, G., Edgecombe, G. D. & Wheeler, W. C. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413, 157–161 (2001)
Brusca, R. C. & Brusca, G. J. Invertebrates 2nd edn (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2003)
Budd, G. E. & Telford, M. J. Along came a sea spider. Nature 437, 1099–1102 (2005)
Hughes, C. L. & Kaufman, T. C. Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan. Evol. Dev. 4, 459–499 (2002)
Meisenheimer, J. Beiträge zur entwicklungsgeschichte der pantopoden. I. Die entwicklung von Ammothea echinata hodge bis zur ausbildung der larvenform. Z. Wiss. Zool. 72, 191–248 (1902)
Winter, G. Beiträge zur morphologie und embryologie des vorderen körperabschnitts (Cephalosoma) der Pantopoda gerstaecker, 1863. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol.-Forsch. 18, 27–61 (1980)
Sanchez, S. Le Développement des Pycnogonides et leurs Affinités avec les Arachnides. Thesis, CNRS, Paris (1959)
Morgan, T. H. A contribution to the embryology and phylogeny of the pycnogonids. Stud. Biol. Lab. Johns Hopkins Univ. 5, 1–76 (1891)
Babu, K. S. Anatomy of the central nervous system of arachnids. Zool. Jb. Anat. 82, 1–154 (1965)
Weygoldt, P. in Neurobiology of Arachnids (ed. Barth, F. G.) 20–37 (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1985)
Sandeman, D. C., Scholtz, G. & Sandeman, R. Brain evolution in decapod Crustacea. J. Exp. Zool. 295, 112–133 (1993)
Henry, L. M. The nervous system of the pycnogonids. Microentomology USA 18, 16–36 (1953)
Schmidt-Rhaesa, A., Bartolomaeus, T., Lemburg, C., Ehlers, U. & Garey, J. R. The position of the Arthropoda in the phylogenetic system. J. Morphol. 238, 263–285 (1998)
Wiren, E. Zur morphologie und phylogenie der pantopoden. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 6, 41–181 (1918)
Bullock, T. H. & Horridge, G. A. Structure and Function in the Nervous Systems of Invertebrates Vol. 2 (Freeman, San Francisco/London, 1965)
Scholtz, G. in Arthropod Relationships (eds Fortey, R. A. & Thomas, R. H.) 317–332 (Chapman and Hall, London, 1997)
Simonnet, F., Deutsch, J. & Quéinnec, E. hedgehog is a segment polarity gene in a crustacean and a chelicerate. Dev. Genes Evol. 214, 537–545 (2004)
Gibert, J. M., Mouchel-Vielh, E., Quéinnec, E. & Deutsch, J. S. Barnacle duplicate engrailed genes: divergent expression patterns and evidence for a vestigial abdomen. Evol. Dev. 2, 194–202 (2000)
We thank the Station Biologique de Roscoff for providing laboratory facilities for specimen collection and preparation. We are grateful to E. Quéinnec, N. Rabet and P. Bunje for advice and discussion, to P. Lamarre for technical help and to T. Jaffredo for laboratory facilities. E. Houliston and G. Scholtz provided much help and insight. This work was funded by the CNRS and the French Ministry of Research.
Sequences from this work have been deposited in the GenBank database with the following accession numbers: DQ315728 (E. spinosa lab); DQ315730 (E. spinosa pb); DQ315733 (E. spinosa Dfd); and DQ315734 (E. spinosa Scr). Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Amino-acid sequence alignment of pycnogonid Hox genes from this work with representative genes from various arthropods. (PDF 15 kb)
Phylogenetic analysis of Endeis spinosa Hox genes from this work, establishing their orthology relationships. (PDF 15 kb)
Text to accompany Supplementary Figures 1 and 2. (DOC 24 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Jager, M., Murienne, J., Clabaut, C. et al. Homology of arthropod anterior appendages revealed by Hox gene expression in a sea spider. Nature 441, 506–508 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04591
Taxonomic Sampling and Rare Genomic Changes Overcome Long-Branch Attraction in the Phylogenetic Placement of Pseudoscorpions
Molecular Biology and Evolution (2021)
Arthropod Structure & Development (2021)
Implications of a cheliceral axial duplication in Tetragnatha versicolor (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) for arachnid deuterocerebral appendage development
Development Genes and Evolution (2021)
Molecular Biology and Evolution (2021)
Arthropod Structure & Development (2018)