Letter | Published:

Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts

Nature volume 440, pages 341345 (16 March 2006) | Download Citation



A whole-genome duplication occurred in a shared ancestor of the yeast species Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces castellii and Candida glabrata. Here we trace the subsequent losses of duplicated genes, and show that the pattern of loss differs among the three species at 20% of all loci. For example, several transcription factor genes, including STE12, TEC1, TUP1 and MCM1, are single-copy in S. cerevisiae but are retained in duplicate in S. castellii and C. glabrata. At many loci, different species have lost different members of a duplicated gene pair, so that 4–7% of single-copy genes compared between any two species are not orthologues. This pattern of gene loss provides strong evidence for speciation through a version of the Bateson–Dobzhansky–Muller mechanism, in which the loss of alternative copies of duplicated genes leads to reproductive isolation1,2. We show that the lineages leading to the three species diverged shortly after the whole-genome duplication, during a period of precipitous gene loss. The set of loci at which single-copy paralogues are retained is biased towards genes involved in ribosome biogenesis and genes that evolve slowly, consistent with the hypothesis that reciprocal gene loss is more likely to occur between duplicated genes that are functionally indistinguishable. We propose a simple, unified model in which a single mechanism—passive gene loss—enabled whole-genome duplication and led to the rapid emergence of new yeast species.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & A model for divergent, allopatric speciation of polyploid pteridophytes resulting from silencing of duplicate-gene expression. Am. Nat. 137, 515–526 (1991)

  2. 2.

    & The origin of interspecies genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am. Nat. 156, 590–605 (2000)

  3. 3.

    & The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res. 15, 1456–1461 (2005)

  4. 4.

    et al. The Yeast Genome Directory. Nature 387 (Suppl.), 5–105 (1997)

  5. 5.

    & Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387, 708–713 (1997)

  6. 6.

    et al. Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science 301, 71–76 (2003)

  7. 7.

    et al. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 430, 35–44 (2004)

  8. 8.

    , & Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428, 617–624 (2004)

  9. 9.

    et al. The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science 304, 304–307 (2004)

  10. 10.

    , & Genome duplication, divergent resolution and speciation. Trends Genet. 17, 299–301 (2001)

  11. 11.

    , , , & Evolution of gene order in the genomes of two related yeast species. Genome Res. 11, 2009–2019 (2001)

  12. 12.

    et al. Engineering evolution to study speciation in yeasts. Nature 422, 68–72 (2003)

  13. 13.

    , , & Hybrid speciation in experimental populations of yeast. Science 298, 1773–1775 (2002)

  14. 14.

    , , & The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. EMBO J. 15, 1726–1733 (1996)

  15. 15.

    & Speciation (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2004)

  16. 16.

    , , , & Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241–254 (2003)

  17. 17.

    et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686–691 (2003)

  18. 18.

    et al. High-definition macromolecular composition of yeast RNA-processing complexes. Mol. Cell 13, 225–239 (2004)

  19. 19.

    et al. CYGD: the comprehensive yeast genome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D364–D368 (2005)

  20. 20.

    , & Parallel inactivation of multiple GAL pathway genes and ecological diversification in yeasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14144–14149 (2004)

  21. 21.

    , & Function and evolution of a minimal plastid genome from a nonphotosynthetic parasitic plant. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10648–10652 (1992)

  22. 22.

    , , & Epistasis and hybrid sterility in Saccharomyces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1167–1171 (2002)

  23. 23.

    , & Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9903–9908 (2004)

  24. 24.

    , , , & Subfunction partitioning, the teleost radiation and the annotation of the human genome. Trends Genet. 20, 481–490 (2004)

  25. 25.

    et al. Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5454–5459 (2005)

Download references


We are grateful to D. Bradley, G. Conant, J. Conery, B. Cusack, H. Fraser, N. Khaldi, W.-H. Li, A. Lloyd, A. McLysaght, G. Singer, R. Vilgalys and M. Woolfit for discussion. This study was supported by Science Foundation Ireland. Author Contributions S.W. and K.H.W. did pilot studies. K.P.B. developed the YGOB and the scoring scheme. D.R.S. did all analyses except those of gene function (K.P.B.) and chromosomal rearrangements (J.L.G.). Manual editing of data in YGOB was done equally by all authors. D.R.S. and K.H.W. wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Devin R. Scannell
    •  & Kevin P. Byrne

    *These authors contributed equally to this work


  1. Smurfit Institute of Genetics, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

    • Devin R. Scannell
    • , Kevin P. Byrne
    • , Jonathan L. Gordon
    • , Simon Wong
    •  & Kenneth H. Wolfe


  1. Search for Devin R. Scannell in:

  2. Search for Kevin P. Byrne in:

  3. Search for Jonathan L. Gordon in:

  4. Search for Simon Wong in:

  5. Search for Kenneth H. Wolfe in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth H. Wolfe.

Supplementary information

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 1

    Biased representation of Gene Ontology (GO) terms in gene loss classes.

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Note 2

    Phylogenetic relationship among S. castellii, S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Note 3

    Estimation of relative timing of speciation events.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Note 4

    Model-based estimation of the number of genes still duplicated at phylogenetic nodes.

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Note 5

    Overrepresentation of slowly evolving genes and genes involved in highly conserved biological processes among genes that underwent RGL.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.